User talk:Fireflysurfer

May 2008
Hi, the recent edit you made to Stacie L. Hays has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. CanadianLinuxUser (talk) 18:21, 3 May 2008 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Stacie Hayez
I have nominated Stacie Hayez, an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Articles for deletion/Stacie Hayez. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • (Broken clamshells•Otter chirps) 22:24, 4 May 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Stacie Hays
A tag has been placed on Stacie Hays requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Rob Banzai (talk) 18:21, 5 May 2008 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Stacie Hays
I have nominated Stacie Hays, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Articles for deletion/Stacie Hays. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Pax85 (talk) 08:02, 6 March 2009 (UTC)

Removing AfD notice...
Please do not remove the AfD notice on the article for Stacie Hays. If you contest the nomination, head on over to the AfD page itself (the link is provided in the template that you deleted) and discuss your opinions there.... Pax85 (talk) 08:15, 6 March 2009 (UTC)

March 2009
Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Stacie Hays has been reverted, as it appears to have removed content from the page without explanation. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Kingpin13 (talk) 11:27, 7 March 2009 (UTC)