User talk:Firenzedu

Your images
Please stop disrupting article flow by inserting your large, large images. They're up for deletion anyways and look like original research. --Neil N  talk to me 16:12, 16 January 2015 (UTC)

January 2015
Please do not add commentary or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Christian denomination. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. Elizium23 (talk) 19:15, 16 January 2015 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at History of Christianity. Favonian (talk) 19:30, 16 January 2015 (UTC)

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be engaged in an edit war with one or more editors. Although repeatedly reverting or undoing another editor's contributions may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, and often creates animosity between editors. Instead of edit warring, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a consensus on the talk page.

If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to be blocked from editing. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. While edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, breaking the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a block. Thank you. Neil N  talk to me 19:43, 16 January 2015 (UTC)