User talk:Fish in the Sea

Okay, Boing, I've looked at that. It's like SRO says there's a problem even with new people who only do minor edits. What does he expect, seriously? And what's wrong with wanting to see if there's an expanded MOS, since there's obviously that simplified one that he pointed out to me?

What evidence is there beyond that? I have a similar address to Stylized? With all the thousands of addresses there are in an area what does that prove? And what motivation would I have? Fish in the Sea (talk) 07:38, 4 September 2016 (UTC)
 * CheckUser technical information is significantly more specific than "has a similar address". Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 09:49, 4 September 2016 (UTC)
 * "I promise not to sockpuppet" and yet a day later, you're socking here. Sro23 (talk) 21:44, 4 September 2016 (UTC)

 Your ability to edit this talk page has been revoked as an administrator has identified your talk page edits as inappropriate and/or disruptive. ([ block log] • [ active blocks] • [ global blocks] • [//tools.wmflabs.org/xtools/autoblock/?user=&project=en.wikipedia.org autoblocks] • contribs • deleted contribs • [ abuse filter log] • [ • change block settings • [ unblock] • [ checkuser] ([ log]))

If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System. If the block is a CheckUser or Oversight block, was made by the Arbitration Committee or to enforce an arbitration decision (arbitration enforcement), or is unsuitable for public discussion, you should appeal to the Arbitration Committee. Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the post of this notice. Jezebel's Ponyo bons mots 22:39, 6 September 2016 (UTC)