User talk:Fisha Malik

Talkbalk about incorrect vandalism warning
There is a message for you at User_talk:Kookoo_Jackster. Best, Barkeep49 (talk) 16:50, 28 July 2020 (UTC)
 * Replying here because I don't want to clog up their talk page. You were not forced to leave an incorrect warning nor a second warning threatening an immediate block. You were not forced to to go against policy by move warring (see WP:DRAFTIFY criteria 3B which has no carve out for an article creator). Itead a better approach would have been to leave them a message letting them know not to create unsourced articles would have been appropriate. You could have also tagged the article itself as unsourced. Let me know if you have further questions or would like to discuss any of these points. Best, Barkeep49 (talk) 17:09, 28 July 2020 (UTC)

Please explain me the criteria 3B in detail with the explaination of term warring, which you have used for me, as far as I know edit warring is 3R in 24 hours and I have moved only 2 times, Best Fisha Malik (talk) 17:20, 28 July 2020 (UTC)
 * Criteria 3B states (emphasis added) If a user reverts your draftifcation that is considered an assertion that the page belongs in mainspace and should not be draftified again. Let me know if that answers your question or there was a part to it that I didn't respond to. Best, Barkeep49 (talk) 20:08, 28 July 2020 (UTC)

CSD nominations on Tanvi hegde
I declined both of your CSD nominations on Tanvi hegde and moved it to Draft:Tanvi Hegde. I don't believe that it met either of the tagged criteria, since it had enough content to identify the subject and may have been a non-wikified stub rather than a test page. It could have been tagged with the A7 criteria because there was no assertion of importance for the person, but because the person shows up as an actor with the same birthday as my top Google results, asserting importance would have been trivial for the creator. This will give the creator a chance to improve the article and have Articles for Creation reviewers verify notability. —Ost (talk) 17:53, 28 July 2020 (UTC)

Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure!

 * Hi Fisha Malik! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission.  I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.
 * The Wikipedia Adventure Start Page
 * The Wikipedia Adventure Lounge
 * The Teahouse new editor help space
 * Wikipedia Help pages

-- 09:27, Thursday, July 30, 2020 (UTC)

Draftifying old articles
Please make sure you check the history before draftifying articles, and don't move them if they're more than a few months old. With Philip Goff, for instance, you moved a redirect that had existed since 2004. (I've since restored it.) This would have been better handled by reverting the article back to its redirect form, and leaving a note for the person trying to create the new article that they should do so in draft space. I hope this makes sense. – bradv  🍁  16:25, 30 July 2020 (UTC)
 * I've also restored Academy of Mr. Kleks, as it has existed since 2012. – bradv  🍁  16:29, 30 July 2020 (UTC)
 * Fisha I notice bradv is now warning you about dratification. Given this, and our conversation yesterday I would ask you to please stop dratifying at this time. Barkeep49 (talk) 16:32, 30 July 2020 (UTC)

Please explain
How you came to the conclusion that consensus at an AFD that closed only 8 days ago was somehow changed when you declined this? Praxidicae (talk) 16:42, 30 July 2020 (UTC)

Oops I misunderstood that article was deleted 2 years ago, Next time I will check the history of the article before any declineFisha Malik (talk) 17:02, 30 July 2020 (UTC)
 * There should be no "next time" in the near future. You lack the experience to reasonably assess speedy deletion and in terms of G4, you lack the ability to sufficiently say it is different since you cannot see deleted content. Not only that, you shouldn't need to check the history when it was literally linked in a gigantic red template that you removed. Praxidicae (talk) 17:03, 30 July 2020 (UTC)

Regarding Page Mayuri_Pandey
Hi Ma'am, Just checked that you've left an speedy deletion tag on the page that I've recently created. Well, It's a page of a YouTuber who is gives lifestyle and dating tips on her YouTube and social media accounts. She is quite popular and I thought creating a page about her might give more info about her to her fans. I don't know her haven't received any penny from her. Just wanted to contribute to Wikipedia and add some value. That's it.. I apologise if I've made any mistake by adding a page about her. But yeah, I think it should be there on Wiki. I request you to keep it.

Thanks & regards, Shubham Jadhav Mobtownin (talk) 16:57, 30 July 2020 (UTC)

please rewrite it in a more formal tone to keep the articleFisha Malik (talk)

Any suggestions? 😊 Mobtownin (talk) 17:09, 30 July 2020 (UTC)

Please write in a more encyclopaedic way, remove the words which are praising the subject, I mean to say the peacock terms, If you need more help please ask the experienced editoors like User: Praxidicae, User:Barkeep49 and othersFisha Malik (talk) 17:13, 30 July 2020 (UTC)

I've made a few changes. Please have a look? Mobtownin (talk) 17:23, 30 July 2020 (UTC)

Removed a lot of stupid praising words 😬 I realized I did a bit too much! Mobtownin (talk) 17:36, 30 July 2020 (UTC)
 * , you did a good job of cleaning up the promotional edits. It would have definitely been eligible for deletion for that previously. I should warn you there are still issues (for instance we should not be citing things to Facebook) and there's a good chance that this article will be nominated for deletion, which is a 7-28 day discussion. Best, Barkeep49 (talk) 17:47, 30 July 2020 (UTC)

Thanks for the quick replies. I'll do more research on this and also try to communicate with this creator and get more referring articles or something to keep the page. You guys are awesome! Gonna learn lot of things from you. Mobtownin (talk) 18:08, 30 July 2020 (UTC)