User talk:Fisherman!7/Evolution of Seed Size

I am an evolution student learning to create a Wikipedia article as a project and would appreciate feedback on sources to use for this topic. Following is my current bibliography.

Bibliography

Jakobsson, A. and Eriksson, O. (2000) ‘A Comparative Study of Seed Number, Seed Size , Seedling Size and Recruitment in Grassland Plants’, Okios, 88(3), pp. 494–502.

Moles, A. T., Ackerly, D. D., Tweddle, J. C., Dickie, J. B., Smith, R., Leishman, M. R., Mayfield, M. M., Pitman, A., Wood, J. T. and Westoby, M. (2007) ‘Global patterns in seed size’, Global Ecol Biogeography, 16(1), pp. 109–116. doi: 10.1111/j.1466-822x.2006.00259.x.

Moles, A. T., Ackerly, D. D., Webb, C. O., Tweddle, J. C., Dickie, J. B. and Westoby, M. (2005) ‘A Brief History of Seed Size’, Science, 307(January), pp. 576–580. doi: 10.1126/science.1229223.

Moles, A. T. and Westoby, M. (2004) ‘Seedling survival and seed size: a synthesis of the literature’, Journal of Ecology, 92(3), pp. 372–383. doi: 10.1111/j.0022-0477.2004.00884.x.

Moles, A. T. and Westoby, M. (2004) ‘What Do Seedlings Die from and What Are the Implications for Evolution of Seed Size?’, Nordic Society Oikos, 106(1), pp. 193–199. Rees, M. (1996) ‘Evolutionary ecology of seed dormancy and seed size’, Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. [Biol]., 351, pp. 1299–1308.

Silvertown, J. (1989) ‘The paradox of seed size and adaptation’, Trends in Ecology and Evolution, pp. 24–26. doi: 10.1016/0169-5347(89)90013-X.

Url, S. and Gomez, J. M. (2004) ‘Bigger Is Not Always Better: Conflicting Selective Pressures on Seed Size in Quercus ilex’, 58(1), pp. 71–80.

Westoby, M., Jurado, E. and Leishman, M. (1992) ‘Comparative evolutionary ecology of seed size’, Trends in Ecology & Evolution. Elsevier Current Trends, 7(11), pp. 368–372. doi: 10.1016/0169-5347(92)90006-W.

Westoby, M., Leishman, M., Lord, J., Poorter, H. and Schoen, D. J. (1996) ‘Comparative Ecology of Seed Size and Dispersal [and Discussion]’, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences. The Royal Society, 351(1345), pp. 1309–1318. doi: 10.1098/rstb.1996.0114.