User talk:Fishje

Speedy deletion of Association of Contingency Planners
A tag has been placed on Association of Contingency Planners, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the guidelines on spam as well as the Business' FAQ for more information.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. ukexpat (talk) 15:21, 7 July 2008 (UTC)

Notability of Association of Continuity Professionals
A tag has been placed on Association of Continuity Professionals requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article appears to be about a real person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable. If this is the first page that you have created, then you should read the guide to writing your first article.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Phlegm Rooster (talk) 03:58, 27 July 2008 (UTC)

Association of Information Technology Professionals
As reviewing admin, I think this page needed to be rewritten from scratch to meet our requirements--it was copied from their web site, which is not permissible. . (I noticed it because the "holdon" tag you added actually has the secondary effect of listing it for speedy deletion as well--the tag you probably meant to use was "underconstruction".)  So I rewrote it. If you want to help further, the following is not only permissible but desirable : a list of its successive presidents, with links, whether or not there is a present article for them, because president of this organization is probably sufficient for notability under WP:PROF, and a list of its awardees, for the same reason. DGG (talk) 21:39, 10 May 2009 (UTC)