User talk:Fishtankapplepie

June 2020
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Flatonia, Texas. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges.   CommanderWaterford (talk) 14:05, 26 June 2020 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Flatonia, Texas, you may be blocked from editing. Thibaut (talk) 14:10, 26 June 2020 (UTC)

under no circumstance would I classify this as an act of vandalism.


 * -Fishtankapplepie Fishtankapplepie (talk) 14:13, 26 June 2020 (UTC)

WP:NOTHERE
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. OhNo itsJamie Talk 14:25, 26 June 2020 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Fishtankapplepie


A tag has been placed on User:Fishtankapplepie, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:
 * It is an "attack page". (See section G10 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Do not create pages that attack, threaten, or disparage their subject or any other entity. Attack pages and files are not tolerated by Wikipedia, and users who create or add such material may be blocked from editing
 * It appears to consist of writings, information, discussions, and/or activities not closely related to Wikipedia's goals. Please note that Wikipedia is not a free Web hosting service. (See section U5 of the criteria for speedy deletion.)

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. ◊ PRAHLAD balaji (M•T•A•C) This message was left at 14:36, 26 June 2020 (UTC)

I have never attacked anyone and I would like to know why my accounts coming under fire for something I never partook in or even considered doing Fishtankapplepie (talk) 14:47, 26 June 2020 (UTC)
 * Nono, you created a page which attacks Walmart. ◊ PRAHLAD balaji (M•T•A•C) This message was left at 14:51, 26 June 2020 (UTC)

How did I attack Wal-Mart, all I did was bring to light that they indeed, do not sell walls. I dont see this as an attack and would like to know how you see this

Contested deletion
This page should not be speedily deleted because... (This account is not a vandalism account, however what I changed on those Wiki's was incorrect, it has came to my attention that my sources are untrustworthy and wont be used again, I am hoping to receive a second chance as I believe I can still help make good changes so that peoples experience on this website are more insightful and fulfilling. Sorry about all of the mistakes I have made, and I promise they will not happen again any time in the future.) --Fishtankapplepie (talk) 14:41, 26 June 2020 (UTC)


 * use for this instead. Best, ◊ PRAHLAD balaji  (M•T•A•C) This message was left at 14:44, 26 June 2020 (UTC)

Why am I being prosecuted as an attacking/vandalizing page?
I am being speedily banned for edits I made than unbeknownst to me were wrong, I accept that I was wrong and had faulty sources, however this should not result in my banning as I feel I still have a chance to help peoples experience on this website Fishtankapplepie (talk) 14:53, 26 June 2020 (UTC)


 * As stated above, use for this, e.g., replacing “your reason here” with your reason. Otherwise, your request might be ignored. ◊ PRAHLAD balaji  (M•T•A•C) This message was left at 15:01, 26 June 2020 (UTC)
 * If you don't understand that this was wrong or think there was an issue with "faulty sources" then either (1) you lack the competence necessary to edit Wikipedia or (2) are trolling us. The end result is the same for both. Talk page access revoked. OhNo itsJamie Talk 16:41, 26 June 2020 (UTC)