User talk:Fiskje88

Articles for deletion/Ramona Trinidad Iglesias-Jordan: Request for examples of significant coverage
Hi. You recently voted "keep" in the discussion @ Articles for deletion/Ramona Trinidad Iglesias-Jordan. Please note that there is no specific notability guideline for "oldest person," and any reliance on such a guideline or presumed precedent is misplaced. All such "oldest persons" must satisfy the general notability guidelines per WP:GNG, as well as other suitability guidelines such as WP:NOPAGE, in order to have a stand-alone article. You are respectfully requested to please provide links to what you believe are the three best examples of significant coverage of the subject in independent, reliable sources per GNG, so other editors may evaluate whether such persons are notable. Thank you. Dirtlawyer1 (talk) 23:48, 15 November 2015 (UTC)

Sockpuppet investigation
Mr. Guye (talk) 01:43, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Dear all, I have had two busy days at work, and only now have I read this notification. I don't quite understand why I am under investigation for sockpuppetry; I do not own/have any other account, nor have I asked others to do anything for me or help me out in any way. I would like to point out that my account has existed longer than most others who were accused of sockpuppetry (if not the longest of all). On top of that, an IP check would have easily shown that all these different accounts edit Wikipedia from different countries, proving we are all unique editors who simply edit a lot in the same topics.Fiskje88 (talk) 16:54, 25 November 2015 (UTC)

Deletion review for Kane Tanaka
An editor has asked for a deletion review of Kane Tanaka. Because you closed the deletion discussion for this page, speedily deleted it, or otherwise were interested in the page, you might want to participate in the deletion review. 100.40.125.198 (talk) 16:42, 16 August 2018 (UTC)