User talk:FitJock87

List of tallest buildings in Europe
Sorry. Please read article, quote "Initially, only a few major financial centres, such as London, Paris, Frankfurt....'". Warsaw is not major financial centre, one of the major in Central Europe, ok, but not in Europe and in the world. Similarly Madrid, Barcelona, Milan is one of the major in South Europe but are not mentioned as an major financial centre in the first sentence. Your edits are considered vandalism and quickly undone. Second: Wrocław? Wrocław is important financial centre in Europe? Huh. Only in Poland. Also, how many skyscrapers have Wrocław? 1? Huh. Your editing is double absurd. Please do not favor your favorite city. Also, your edition violates the principle of Neutral point of view. Subtropical-man (talk) 07:42, 2 September 2012 (UTC)

VIGO System
Pleaase realize that VIGO is a vendor. There is no reference at all that Poland (or VIGO specifically) took any part in the research and development of the SAM instrument abord the rover. I will be very grateful if you desist of inserting misleading information in the Curiosity article. SUch assertion of being a SAM R&D "partner" is false and qualifies as SPAM, so it will be deleted in its totality if you twist again the rather weak commercial reference you keep inserting. Thank you, BatteryIncluded (talk) 01:47, 9 September 2012 (UTC)


 * Maybe you will also list the company that sold bolts and nuts to NASA? The seat covers? The Mickey Mouse stickers in the bathroom? VIGO is a vendor, one of thousands, and you are still incapable of showing otherwise. Torturing your single SPAM reference will not succeed. BatteryIncluded (talk) 03:22, 9 September 2012 (UTC)


 * Well if You compare a product of a high-tech industry designed for a mission to Mars to a "sticker in the bathroom" or a "seat cover" well that only proves Your ignorance not to use more precise words.. --FitJock87 (talk) 03:42, 9 September 2012 (UTC)


 * I am pleased that you finally got into your thick skull they VIGO is just a vendor, and is not a SAM team member, as you were falsely claiming for months. BatteryIncluded (talk) 14:19, 9 September 2012 (UTC)


 * Conversation with You is very amusing really, its not often that I have an opportunity to talk with people who r mentally at the playschool level. Anyway I hope that You will stop playing Your silly games and quit deleting informations about Vigo from the main article. Now You can go back to ur sandbox. Cheers. --FitJock87 (talk) 23:44, 9 September 2012 (UTC)


 * Yes, I will allow you to keep your VIGO entry with my corrections: they are a sub-system vendor not the SAM designers. Lieing in an ecyclopedia is really stOopid, you know? I'm watching you. BatteryIncluded (talk) 15:10, 10 September 2012 (UTC)
 * You r not only stupid but also pathetic..Enjoy!--FitJock87 (talk) 02:00, 20 November 2012 (UTC)

Amsterdam on the List of tallest buildings in Europe: warning
According to Emporis, Amsterdam has 6 skyscrapers above 100 m, (plus Woontoren Arena as planned, two as unbuilt). All this building Emporis marked as skyscrapers. Wrocław has only 1 skyscraper - still unfinished. Please, stop trolling and stop favors Polish cities. Subtropical-man (talk) 20:36, 19 September 2012 (UTC)

Note on 2010 Polish Air Force Tu-154 crash
A few comments about this article. First, I note that you were canvassed to come here, as you admit in this diff on User Talk:Voyt13. Please note that Voyt13 has been indefinitely blocked (by me, based upon my own observations and discussion at WP:ANI) for disruptive editing, showing battleground behavior, and generally not being here to build the encyclopedia). Now, he never should have contacted you on another Wiki to try to bring you here to help--this is a direct violation of WP:CANVAS; it's worse if he did it after being blocked. But that's more a problem for him than you. The problem for you is that from your very first edits to Talk:2010 Polish Air Force Tu-154 crash, you appear to be exhibiting the same battleground mentality. Try to discuss the matter calmly. I also recommend that you look through past discussions on the matter, because my understanding is that there was a solid consensus to not include the Polish Parliamentary group. Now, I don't care one way or the other (I actually know nothing about the subject), but I do know that if there is a stable consensus, new editors can't just come in and demand that all of the same arguments be dredged up again, over and over again. So, like I said, look back through the talk page archives, see why the information was rejected, and see if you are actually raising any substantively new points. Finally, please understand that Wikipedia is not the place to right great wrongs. Our job is to do nothing more than summarize the major positions given in reliable sources, not to try to figure out the "truth". Qwyrxian (talk) 13:18, 20 November 2012 (UTC)

Re: Warsaw
And can you please explain what is the added value of your edits? exept from bringing chaos to a quite well structured article? discuss your changes!! BurgererSF (talk) 22:45, 19 April 2013 (UTC)


 * Exactly ugly ones, like grey and sad pic, stop "dressing" articles according to your personal taste!! it's extremely ridiculous and pointless, please respect the content and overall composition of the article. Besides this brick wall is really the Uprising Museum? I was editing the content of those sections and in my opinion your recent editions don't fit. But of course if you will get a significant support of the community for your changes I'll not interfere. BurgererSF (talk) 06:20, 20 April 2013 (UTC)
 * Yes I have created or largely expanded those sections. I know their content and in my opinion your "dressing" does not fit. I don't have time for stupid discussions without conclusion. As I have mentioned before if you will get a significant support of the community in talk section for your changes I'll not interfere. BurgererSF (talk) 19:11, 20 April 2013 (UTC)
 * Please discuss your problems with somone else!!!BurgererSF (talk) 06:48, 21 April 2013 (UTC)