User talk:Fitthajen

Welcome!
Hello, Fitthajen, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Draft:Vaginashark, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's content policies and may not be retained. In short, the topic of an article must be notable and have already been the subject of publication by reliable and independent sources.

Please review Your first article for an overview of the article creation process. The Article Wizard is available to help you create an article, where it will be reviewed and considered for publication. For information on how to request a new article that can be created by someone else, see Requested articles. If you are stuck, come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can help you through the processes.

New to Wikipedia? Please consider taking a look at the our introductory tutorial or reviewing the contributing to Wikipedia page to learn the basics about editing. Below are a few other good pages about article creation.
 * Article development
 * Standard layout
 * Lead section
 * How to write a great article
 * The perfect article

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions ask me on my talk page or you can just type help me on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! --   LuK3      (Talk)   02:15, 11 December 2020 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Draft:Vaginashark


Please do not introduce inappropriate pages, such as Draft:Vaginashark, to Wikipedia. Doing so is considered to be vandalism and is prohibited. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Under section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, the page has been deleted. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges.

Please do not recreate the material without addressing these concerns, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If you think this page should not have been deleted for this reason, you may contact the, or if you have already done so, you may open a discussion at Deletion Review --    LuK3      (Talk)   02:15, 11 December 2020 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Vaginashark


A tag has been placed on Draft:Vaginashark, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent. If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. WhoAteMyButter ( 📬 │ ✏️ ) 02:36, 11 December 2020 (UTC)

December 2020
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Therese Johaug has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 06:11, 11 December 2020 (UTC)
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: Therese Johaug was changed by Fitthajen (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.95144 on 2020-12-11T06:11:41+00:00

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Martin Stenmarck. Your edits continue to appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted. Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 06:13, 11 December 2020 (UTC)
 * If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Martin Stenmarck was changed by Fitthajen (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.927745 on 2020-12-11T06:13:35+00:00

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Alexander Isak, you may be blocked from editing. Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: Alexander Isak was changed by Fitthajen (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.954188 on 2020-12-11T06:15:50+00:00 Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 06:15, 11 December 2020 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Therese Johaug. 49ersBelongInSanFrancisco (talk) 06:18, 11 December 2020 (UTC)

 You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for vandalism. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. --Bongwarrior (talk) 06:18, 11 December 2020 (UTC)