User talk:Fivi Zogbi

February 2018
Attention: any thinking person or entity:

Please be advised I am not interested in creating a presence on Wikipedia for I have long been aware that Wikipedia's failure to verify citations makes it an unreliable source to the extent that it is prohibited as a ciation in academia. I stumbled across a page about that made defamatory allegations on an issue that is nearly 30 years old. Had I not been aware of the case at the time and knew the falscification from first hand observation I might have proceeded without a second thought. But the absurdity of Wikipedia doing its begathons online and then permitting unverified claims that could be legally contrued as defamatory demanded an immediate response. So, please do not attempt to instruct me on how to use your site that is of such low regard among academics for good reason, as I now see. __________________________

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Gloria Macarenko has been reverted. Your edit here to Gloria Macarenko was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline. The external link(s) you added or changed (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-79ZMCl3tjI) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. If the external link you inserted or changed was to a media file (e.g. a sound or video file) on an external server, then note that linking to such files may be subject to Wikipedia's copyright policy, as well as other parts of our external links guideline. If the information you linked to is indeed in violation of copyright, then such information should not be linked to. Please consider using our upload facility to upload a suitable media file, or consider linking to the original. If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 21:43, 6 February 2018 (UTC)

Hello, I'm The Interior. I noticed that you made an edit concerning content related to a living (or recently deceased) person   on Gloria Macarenko, but you didn't support your changes with a citation to a reliable source, so I removed it. Wikipedia has a very strict policy concerning how we write about living people, so please help us keep such articles accurate and clear. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you! The Interior (Talk) 22:07, 6 February 2018 (UTC)

Concerns regarding your edits
It is a apparent from the information you are attempting to add to the Gloria Macarenko article that you using Wikipedia to further a dispute with the article subject. That absolutely will not be allowed to occur. Wikipedia has very strict policies regarding living persons, and accounts cannot be used to cast aspersions or "right great wrongs" as you appear to be doing here. Please refrain from editing the article further as you are clearly not able to do so in the neutral manner required by policy. Thank you, -- Jezebel's Ponyo bons mots 16:57, 7 February 2018 (UTC) ______________________

No, to the contrary. If Wikipedia has any integrity, even the smallest shred of integrity, responsible editors would have verified the corrections attempted earlier. I am seeking to prevent the defamation I first saw against in the distorted postings by you or someone like you who either posted or permitted to be posted under the heading of "Human Rights".

Wikipedia and the person doing the initial posting should have been aware of the potential defamatory comments made against who has retained a distance since the issue was resolved in 2002. Can you count how many years have elapsed since 1989, then 2002 and 2018? I suggest you replace the initial posting if you're so confident that it is. It was firstly, irrelevant at this stage as nearly 30 yrs have passed. Further, there is a grave failure to confirm the other claims made about claims that have not been verified. In fact, if one calculates dates, I have not yet forwarded this to the relevant party or parties but if it continues without correction or verification, then I will forward this to relevant parties and you and Wikipedia will be held accountable.

I suggest you consult the initial posting so that perhaps it can be discerned who is acting in unwarraned malice. Then I'd advise you get legal advice and decide if only verifiable claims should be made. The legitimacy of all Wikipedia sources should not be held to such a low standard.

I repeat that I suggest the original posting should be replaced before the corrections were made and then anyone can determine who initiated an effort at defamation that was intended to further not a dispute. Taken altogether, that reveals with no illusions who is trying to "further" a non-issue at this late date. I suggest you should verify any claims made on this posting regarding this person.

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for contravening Wikipedia's biographies of living persons policy. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Jezebel's Ponyo bons mots 16:46, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
 * As you continue to make the same unsubstantiated allegations against the subject of one of our articles, and as this is the sole purpose of this account, I have blocked your account without talk page access. If you would like to appeal the block you can do so via this method.-- Jezebel's Ponyo bons mots 16:46, 8 February 2018 (UTC)