User talk:Fixer3000

Eversource Energy
Hello,

I saw that you blanked a section of the article Eversource Energy, specifically one that dealt with allegations against the company for which the company has issued a cease and desist. A cease and desist order is not a binding document, and it does not prohibit us from reporting on the allegations being made. Even if the allegations are demonstratably false, we can still report that there has been allegations. (Albeit, it would also be a good idea in that case to point out that the allegations are false) In this case, none of the content you removed seemed to be entering the territory where it would be problematic. The article did not assert that the allegation were false, but instead presented both sides of the argument, pointing out the allegations, and the response from Eversource (the cease and desist). As such, I have reinstated the content on the page as it stood before you removed it. If you have a valid reason for removing material, the usual procedure is to discuss it on the talk page of the article if it stands to be controversial.

Also, this is almost a nitpick, but you marked that edit as "minor". Any edit that someone might object to, or might warrant further scrutiny is usually not marked as a minor edit. Removal of content from a page is almost never a minor edit, and it's generally frowned upon to do so. That's just a tip that makes maintaining the wiki easier, by allowing us to filter out noncontroversial edits.

If you have any questions, feel free to hit me up on my talk page. Acebulf (talk) 04:55, 27 February 2018 (UTC)