User talk:Fizbin

Oakland, California
Regarding the nickname problem in Oakland, California, Cholga continues to reintroduce the nickname without a reliable source. I reverted Cholga one time and explain to he/she in talk page. But it seems to me that he/she have trouble understanding what is notable or based on a reliable source. Cholga reverted every one of my edit, and would possibly engage in an edit war with me. Now I stop the revert and stop further conflict today. Hopefully I can get a second opinion from you to determine whether Cholga's citation is a good source or have you discuss with Cholga more about source. Sorry to disturb you. Thanks. Chris! my talk 23:28, 13 August 2007 (UTC)

hey long time no talk
would you give your opinion here please? Hi there, would you be so kind as to provide an indepenant neutral opinion of the image Construccionkaiserrick.jpg at the section of the same name on the talk page of Richmond Medical Center here please? Thank you very much as this may help to alleviate a current debate over its inclusion.CholgatalK! 01:07, 23 August 2007 (UTC)

funny, you do actually, just a little bit, but with a much more underlying friendly undertone which certain people i find it hard to believe may not infrequently achieve. as for it "adding nothing" explain please, i dont understand. ive heard people say it just illustrates a common construction scene but bart station pictures just illustrate a common subway station prototype, its not a picture of just any construction its a picture of the expansion of this hospital.CholgatalK! 03:28, 23 August 2007 (UTC)

Re: User Talk Pages for IP Address
Hi, yeah you are right sometimes. But as you can see on this user contribs, IPs don't change that often and we must at least take the chance in order to inform them before blocking. Because anyway the block is only effective against one IP so if they change there's not much we can do ;). -- lucasbfr talk 00:59, 26 August 2007 (UTC)

oakland
IL2BA now removed Oaktown, O-town, and The Town from the Oakland page, in fact he removed the entire parameter from the infobox, saying nicknames are irrelevant, it thought you might want to know and restore it.CholgatalK! 00:42, 30 August 2007 (UTC)

s.p. resevoir
oh sorry about that, i was just trying to get it off the ground, if theres no useful mergable material it should be deleted or turned into a redirect.CholgatalK! 20:22, 30 August 2007 (UTC)

Outstanding picture - barnstar awarded


The copy of this picture on WP was deleted so I fixed your page to show the extant version on WP Commons for you, hope you dont mind. DukeB-120th 06:49, 23 July 2008 (UTC)

Tilden as Amusement Park
By almost any definition of 'amusement park' I've ever heard, Tilden does not qualify. It is an outdoor nature park that happens to have one traditional amusement park ride - a merry go round - in it. That hardly qualifies it as an amusement park. If someone said to you 'hey, lets go to this amusement park I know of' and you said 'great idea, I love amusement parks more than anything else in the world' and you ended up at Tilden, you would be sorely disappointed.--Fizbin (talk) 18:28, 5 February 2008 (UTC)

There is a science museum to have fun in, a train to be ridden, a lake to swim in, a nature center to see.a merry go round to go around in. It fits my idea of a "amusement area in the BAy Area" though I hear what you are saying that it is not Marine World AfricaUSA or Great America. rkmlai (talk) 18:34, 5 February 2008 (UTC)

Care to further discuss ? rkmlai (talk) 18:44, 5 February 2008 (UTC)


 * As I said above, calling it an amusement park is exceedingly deceptive advertising. Great America and the Santa Cruz Boardwalk are amusement parks - Tilden is not. By your definition 90% of the parks in the Bay Area are amusement parks. --Fizbin (talk) 19:07, 5 February 2008 (UTC)
 * I dont believe that 90% of the parks in the Bay Area all include amusement park rides, museums, nature centers. Which parts of the Bay Area do you reside in or abouts ? They sound like fun areas. rkmlai (talk) 19:30, 5 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Grew up next to and played/hiked/rode often in Tilden. Never once considered it an amusement park. Those, back in the day, were Playland at the Beach and the Santa Cruz Boardwalk.--Fizbin (talk) 19:58, 5 February 2008 (UTC)


 * I grew up in Berkeley. Went swimming in Lake Anza, then took my kids to the Redwood Valley Railway and Tilden Park Merry-Go-Round, then later took my girlfriend's dog on walks around Lake Anza. These were the less expensive, local, environmental, amusement parks of my time. I still think Tilden should be listed as an place of "amusement" and "park" rkmlai (talk) 20:49, 5 February 2008 (UTC)
 * True, there are ponies, a carousel, and a train, but the tone of the Tilden park is by no means amusement park. Search the EBRPD website and you will not find a single instance of the term "amusement." There is a heavy focus on the area as being a place of natural preservation and education. An amusement park is not spread out over a vast expanse of rolling hills and empty space. Every amusement park I have ever been to has been too loud to hear yourself think, in addition to being crammed full of money making verntures. Rkmlai, I am sorry, my friend, but you missed the mark on this one. DukeB-120th 06:44, 23 July 2008 (UTC)

Hasay edit
Hey could you set Jordan Hasay's page back to the "bullet point" format it was before someone changed it? I feel it makes a much easier read. Thanks (I'm not sure how to do this). —Preceding unsigned comment added by B0bby flay (talk • contribs) 22:58, 11 February 2008 (UTC)

Re:Jordan Hasay
Hello there Fizbin, I closed the Afd as "keep" because, as an uninvolved admin, I found the arguments in favour of keeping the page more rational and convincing. A quick google search showed multiple credible sources, which made non-notability feeble grounds for deletion. Besides, the concerns about the page "reading like a resume" wasn't strong, as articles can be tagged for improvement, not outright deletion. In summary, national standard achievements (verified by good sources), in all likelihood, establishes notability. I considered this discussion a clear-cut case so I didn't provide a closing rationale (otherwise I'd have repeated all "keep" arguments ;))

As for my edits, I added some references to verify notability, for the dearth of outside references in the article could be misintepreted as evidence for non-notability of the subject by many users. (For future AfD reference, it should be noted that the addition of reliable sources, if they exist, is often the best reasoning for keeping an article) The aim of the reformation was essentially to make the page read more like a normal biography article with paragraphs than a list enumerating competitions and awards (please see some other articles and you'll see what I mean :)). I do realise that the article may not represent the materials as clearly as a list, but I dearly hope an editor who is more familiar with the topic than me would help with some rewriting in the future; that would be collaboration at its finest, and how wiki is supposed to work. :) Sorry for any confusion caused regarding the debate closure and my following edits. Best regards, --PeaceNT (talk) 11:54, 13 February 2008 (UTC)

July 2008
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue dispute resolution. Beloved Freak  12:51, 17 July 2008 (UTC)

RE: El Sobrante Hills
Hi Fizbin, I notice that you reverted my deletion of the name derivation for the El Sobrante Hills community. You were the original contributor of that, and I myself live in that community so we both appear to have a common interest, hehe. At any rate, I would argue that the explanation is superfluous because it already appears on the El Sobrante article. Also, I'm not an expert on sourcing on WP, but I'm not sure if it needs a source (though after three years of high school Spanish and extensive interaction with Mexican immigrants, I know this translation to be correct DukeB-120th 06:56, 23 July 2008 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Editor assistance/Requests
Hi there, there is currently a discussion about the above article at Editor assistance/Requests which you may want to participate in. -- Beloved Freak  12:54, 17 July 2008 (UTC)

WikiProject San Francisco Bay Area roll call
Hello from WikiProject San Francisco Bay Area!

As part of a recent update to our project main page we are conducting a roll call to check which members are still active and interested in working on bay area related content. If you are still interested in participating, simply move your username from the inactive section of the participant list to the active section. I hope you will find the redesigned project pages helpful, and I wanted to welcome you back to the project. If you want you can take a look at the newly redesigned:


 * [[Image:Crystal Clear app Community Help.png|25px|]]Main Page
 * [[Image:Crystal Clear app Login Manager.png|25px|]]Talk page
 * [[Image:Broom icon.svg|25px|]]Cleanup listing
 * [[Image:Template icon.svg|25px|]]Template list

As well as the existing pages:
 * [[Image:Crystal Clear app clean.png|25px|]]Assessment
 * [[Image:Crystal Clear app kedit.png|25px|]]Article Worklist
 * [[Image:Crystal Clear app kdict.png|25px|]]Watchlist
 * [[Image:Crystal Clear action editdelete.png|25px|]] Deletion sorting (California)

If you have any questions, don't hesitate to ask at the project talk page, and add it to your watchlist, if it isn't already.

Again, hi! -Optigan13 (talk) 07:51, 17 August 2008 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with File:Oakland Mormon Temple at Christmas.JPG
Thanks for uploading File:Oakland Mormon Temple at Christmas.JPG. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by STBotI. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 16:02, 27 December 2008 (UTC)

Tyson Gay
I've reduced the wind assisted run info. is that better? Sillyfolkboy (talk) 03:55, 12 February 2009 (UTC)

Galen Rupp
I'm sorry, that was pretty careless of me to get that mixed up. --Omarcheeseboro (talk) 03:06, 8 March 2009 (UTC)

Possibly unfree File:Sandy Koufax 1964 Topps Baseball Card.jpg
An image that you uploaded or altered, File:Sandy Koufax 1964 Topps Baseball Card.jpg, has been listed at Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the image description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. &mdash; neuro  (talk)  00:22, 10 March 2009 (UTC)  -- &mdash;  neuro  (talk)  00:22, 10 March 2009 (UTC)

"Herb Caen" section in San Francisco Chronicle article
Hello. You did a nice job with breaking up this section into paragraphs. I had in fact written this entire section and I was rather curious about whether or not other editors with knowledge of and interest in this subject would find it fit to stay as it is. I hope that the content meets the approval of all concerned. My writing style, and it it not a style but merely a habit, is to employ fewer paragraph breaks in pursuit of driving home a single idea. But you, whether you are an individual or a consensus, made an improvement here. Best wishes, Nick Lantana11 (talk) 03:22, 17 March 2009 (UTC)Lantana11Lantana11 (talk) 03:22, 17 March 2009 (UTC)


 * It does need a lot of reworking, starting with a new "front page" image. Lantana11 (talk) 17:32, 17 March 2009 (UTC)Lantana11Lantana11 (talk) 17:32, 17 March 2009 (UTC)

El Sobrante
Hi Fizbin, if you're still interested, could you please comment on Talk:El_Sobrante,_California to say whether or not you agree with my suggestion, which will enable us to put this conversation to bed? Ta, Bigger digger (talk) 18:22, 5 May 2009 (UTC)

Unreferenced BLPs
Hello Fizbin! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 1 of the articles that you created  is an  Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. Please note that all biographies of living persons must be sourced. If you were to add reliable, secondary sources to this article, it would greatly help us with the current Category:All_unreferenced_BLPs article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the unreferencedBLP tag. Here is the article:

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 19:50, 2 January 2010 (UTC)
 * 1) Tim Danielson -

Edit warring at El Sobrante
Please stop edit warring at El Sobrante. Judy Malloy lives there, is notable, and therefore is a notable resident. Binksternet (talk) 23:34, 7 January 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Ron Parker (artist)
Please do not make statements attacking people or groups of people. Wikipedia has a strict policy against personal attacks. Attack pages and images are not tolerated by Wikipedia and are speedily deleted. Users who continue to create or repost such pages and images in violation of our biographies of living persons policy will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Thank you.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Amsaim (talk) 22:34, 27 January 2010 (UTC)

Final discussion for Requests for comment/Biographies of living people
Hello, I note that you have commented on the first phase of Requests for comment/Biographies of living people

As this RFC closes, there are two proposals being considered:
 * 1) Proposal to Close This RfC
 * 2) Alternate proposal to close this RFC: we don't need a whole new layer of bureaucracy

Your opinion on this is welcome. Okip  02:17, 24 February 2010 (UTC)

deleted coordintes during cleanup
Why did you delete the coordinates from Lafayette Reservoir? --Stepheng3 (talk) 23:06, 4 March 2010 (UTC)

National high school records
I'm in full agreement with most of what you said. I'm aware of Jack Sheppard's work and did try to take what I could find into account. That applies particularly to progression and imperial marks. But most of what I sourced did come from the NFHS, who, whether we like it or not, is the official body.

I did leave this deliberately sport generic, corresponding with the ambiguity of WP:ATHLETE. Being a High School National Record holder (at any point in time) is a condition of notability, so articles about the missing recordholders can be written. I did several, Jeff Nelson just yesterday. I happen to know Track, but someone else might know swimming, or maybe even football and basketball. At that point then we can categorize the sport within sub-categories. Same thing could go for other countries, should they show up in the category. Until then, I'll follow the KISS principle. I look at Wikipedia as a repository for information. If we get more information, we can then design better ways of presenting it.

I notice you seem to be in the Contra Costa area. I understand Cory Schubert is coaching in that area. She is one of those folks that would deserve an article, but there is relatively little information available. Trackinfo (talk) 05:14, 4 February 2011 (UTC)


 * Schbert is a discrepancy between the two lists. The NFHS list I'm working from omits Shea.  It actually omits a lot of people or at least discounts certain performances.  The big difference I am aware of between the two lists is NFHS does not recognize performances not set in meets they sanctioned.   Open races are out.  Hassay at the Olympic trials doesn't exist to them.  Better yet, Ryun is pictured in the link, but doesn't make their own list.  Obviously his 3:51.3 at Berkeley in the National Championships would be omitted, but there is video of him running sub-4 at the Kansas State Meet (an NFHS sanctioned meet) up on the web, which shoots a hole through any idea that their list is accurate by their own standard.  Its just the official governing body.


 * All that said here, we could probably write an article embarrassing NFHS's record keeping, as if they would care. (Technically I'm a member of both NFHS and USATF, and a subscriber to T&FN's e-list).  Or we could write the long explanation into each article.  Or just use one body recognizing the record as an excuse to write yet another article about a remarkable athlete at the high school level who never made a similar showing on the elite level and use the sourced claim of a national record by one body as an excuse not to have it deleted by the uninformed wikipedia oligarchy.  Hell, this is wikipedia:  We can merge the two lists and create our own version of the record progression in each event.  Masters athletics records were in such disarray, I've already done that to their Masters Athletics World Records and United States records in masters athletics. Trackinfo (talk) 00:20, 5 February 2011 (UTC)


 * I ended up on that NFHS list while searching for an actual progression. Unless you dig through back issues, T&FNs inconsistent public web presence limits how historical you can trace information back.  I guess I see WP as a solution to the absence of information.  If we can firmly plant the facts onto the #7 website (or whatever it is now) in the world, the #1 item in most information google searches . . . the information has less of a likelihood of disappearing, even if other links do. Trackinfo (talk) 01:12, 5 February 2011 (UTC)

Charlie Francis in Electrical Muscle Stimulation
One month ago you suggested Charlie Francis was not a good choice for a practitioner of Electrical Muscle Stimulation. I asked whom did you have in mind. I'm always willing to learn, and I would appreciate if you could give me some feedback.--Gciriani (talk) 19:43, 25 April 2011 (UTC)

Pat Crandall
The events listed on the Masters Athletics records lists match the official record specifications for World Masters Athletics, at least at the time of the performance. They do evolve over time, there will be a General Assembly meeting in July in Sacramento after which changes will be announced. The current standards are posted at: http://world-masters-athletics.org/files/laws_rules/app_a2.pdf  We could go crazy with full size shot, discus and javelin records across all ages. And yes, I know there are guys out there now and in the past, throwing those weights with such aspirations. It invites a section, just like Imperial distances on the Open records pages. But we need to make the distinction about these things. By the way, the record is, so far, unsourced. We should source stuff on WP, though it would be interesting to compile such a database. And on a personal note, now that I know about the claimed record, I ought to go after it myself. I'm not that far off. Trackinfo (talk) 01:10, 13 May 2011 (UTC)

Notification of automated file description generation
Your upload of File:Briones Reservoir.jpg or contribution to its description is noted, and thanks (even if belatedly) for your contribution. In order to help make better use of the media, an attempt has been made by an automated process to identify and add certain information to the media's description page.

This notification is placed on your talk page because a bot has identified you either as the uploader of the file, or as a contributor to its metadata. It would be appreciated if you could carefully review the information the bot added. To opt out of these notifications, please follow the instructions here. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 14:11, 24 February 2014 (UTC)


 * Another one of your uploads, File:Briones Dam.jpg, has also had some information automatically added. If you get a moment, please review the bot's contributions there as well. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 14:15, 25 February 2014 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:37, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Wikipedia:WikiProject United States/The 50,000 Challenge
--MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:37, 8 November 2016 (UTC)

File copyright problem with File:Tilden Bust.jpg
Thank you for uploading File:Tilden Bust.jpg. However, it is currently missing information on its copyright and licensing status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can verify that it has an acceptable license status and a verifiable source. Please add this information by editing the image description page. You may refer to the image use policy to learn what files you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. The page on copyright tags may help you to find the correct tag to use for your file. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please also check any other files you may have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is [ a list of your uploads].

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:00, 11 March 2021 (UTC)

File:Regina Jacobs Bus Stop.JPG listed for discussion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Regina Jacobs Bus Stop.JPG, has been listed at Files for discussion. Please see the to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Ixfd64 (talk) 03:12, 30 May 2023 (UTC)