User talk:Fizz fam/Archive 1

June 2020
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Neslihan Bozkaya has been reverted. Your edit here to Neslihan Bozkaya was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline. The external link(s) you added or changed (https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCit90PO9YNdjWqfk5tUPyPA) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. If the external link you inserted or changed was to a media file (e.g. music or video) on an external server, then note that linking to such files may be subject to Wikipedia's copyright policy, as well as other parts of our external links guideline. If the information you linked to is indeed in violation of copyright, then such information should not be linked to. Please consider using our upload facility to upload a suitable media file, or consider linking to the original. If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 08:46, 16 June 2020 (UTC)

Fizz fam, you are invited to the Teahouse!
!

185.81.140.87
Why Revert an edit at Qurnat as Sawda

Robert Gordon (musician)
You're a new user. You shouldn't be reverting edits without knowledge. Robert Gordon (musician) was corrected to link to the correct article. Rick Moranis and Dave Thomas referred to in that article refer to Bob and Doug McKenzie -- 65.94.169.16 (talk) 07:16, 3 August 2020 (UTC)

History of South Australia
Hey, thanks for reverting that IP's unexplained content removal. It was my unstable connection which caused me reverting your edit instead of the IP's,apologies for that and happy editing! Bingo bro  (Chat)  09:43, 6 August 2020 (UTC)

August 2020
Please refrain from abusing warning or blocking templates. Doing so is a violation of Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Please use the user warnings sandbox for any tests you may want to do, or take a look at our introduction page to learn more about contributing to the encyclopedia. Thank you. Megan Barris  (Lets talk📧)  07:25, 7 August 2020 (UTC)

WP:RFP
Just be careful while editing, ok? Use the preview before hitting publish changes. Sometimes mistakes are not that easy to correct. Regards. Lectonar (talk) 08:27, 7 August 2020 (UTC)

Precious Cargo (Star Trek: Enterprise)
Hi!

You reverted three of my edits here: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Precious_Cargo_(Star_Trek:_Enterprise)&diff=971785591&oldid=971785527

The first edit consolidated several repeated raw refs into one templated and reusable citation. The second and third edits removed tags which - to me at least - no longer seemed to be relevant. The templated warning you left me suggested that these edits might breach Wikipedia's policies on vandalism and limits on acceptable additions, but I'm unclear how.

Ironically, it was my fourth edit - the removal of a section (https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Precious_Cargo_(Star_Trek:_Enterprise)&diff=971785631&oldid=971785591) which I thought might fall foul of anti-vandalism patrollers!

Could you take another look at your revert (https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Precious_Cargo_(Star_Trek:_Enterprise)&diff=prev&oldid=971785591) and let me know how I could have edited better? 84.93.108.104 (talk) 06:24, 8 August 2020 (UTC)
 * your latest Edit you deleted a section  which Was fine, but when you deleted the footnote i do not see why you would do that. You could of made it the latest information. If you couldn’t find it then you can say it more clearly in the edit summary. Sorry Of my bad spelling.Fizz fam (talk) 06:35, 8 August 2020 (UTC)
 * I made three edits which you reverted:
 * The first did not remove a footnote. The same URL was previously used several times - "raw refs". I created a named ref using the URL and replaced the raw refs with the named ref. I also used the named ref to cite previously uncited claims that had been tagged, and removed the tags. I believe this was an appropriate edit and served to address some of the concerns previous editors had raised.
 * The second and third edits did not remove a footnote - they removed templates that I believe were no longer relevant.
 * I believe my edit summaries (and "Tidied up ref, cited a few tagged claims, etc" in particular) accurately and concisely described what action I took.
 * 84.93.108.104 (talk) 06:52, 8 August 2020 (UTC)
 * Anyway advise you to Make a account because it hides your ip and you can gain trust in wikipedia because you do not gain rights when you are not loged, which most people rely on sadly and Finaly if you do not make a account soon when you make a account your edits do not come with it. This is just opinion so im not forcing you to make account but i think it is better.Fizz fam (talk) 07:10, 8 August 2020 (UTC)
 * Could you address the concerns I've raised with your revert? Whether or not I edit as an IP editor is not at all relevant here; what's at issue is that you reverted what I continue to believe are valid edits, and you have not yet provided a decent explanation. (Incidentally, it makes it much easier to follow conversations if you indent your replies). 84.93.108.104 (talk) 08:40, 8 August 2020 (UTC)

There is currently a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Contested "anti-vandalism" revert 84.93.108.104 (talk) 07:09, 10 August 2020 (UTC)

New message from Fizz fam
notifying someone to look at my talk page that is not reply Fizz fam (talk) 06:46, 8 August 2020 (UTC) Make sure you put a new topic in a new section. YOU CAN NOT CHANGE HISTORY YOU !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Hello dear .. I wana change political history of ch iftekhar hussain gondal
Chaudhry Iftikhar Gondal's Imran Khan's tireless soldier !!! Chaudhry Sahib is a player on the PTI front foot who played a smoky innings for the PTI in the 2013 elections and caused a wave of trouble in the opposition camp. Despite the fatigue in the elections, his stability has not faltered and public service, liaison and loyalty to the party is still remained. Iftikhar Gondal made every sacrifice for the PTI and as Imran Khan's soldier, he persevered in every movement and front against the government, even he denied Grade 18 government job which was for his son Zia-ur-Rehman Gondal. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Engr Shahid khan (talk • contribs) 08:19, 8 August 2020 (UTC) Make sure you put a new topic in a new section. YOU CAN NOT CHANGE HISTORY YOU !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

S. China Sea
Why did you undo my edit? I just want to confirm with you first instead of escalating this into an edit war. Thanks! Firestar464 (talk) 06:58, 20 October 2020 (UTC)
 * , What edit Fizz fam (talk) 04:32, 5 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Resolved. Never mind. Firestar464 (talk) 04:57, 5 November 2020 (UTC)

Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure!

 * Hi Fizz fam! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission.  I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.
 * The Wikipedia Adventure Start Page
 * The Wikipedia Adventure Lounge
 * The Teahouse new editor help space
 * Wikipedia Help pages

-- 09:31, Friday, November 6, 2020 (UTC)

Capitalization of job titles
Please do not interfere with editors who are using lower case for job titles per the MoS at MOS:JOBTITLES. Chris the speller  yack  04:40, 25 April 2021 (UTC)

RedWarn installation instructions
Thank you for your edits, but the instructions in that part of RedWarn/Install/2 are tried and tested to be accurate. If you need any help with your install, feel free to let us know. ✨ Ed  talk!  ✨ 20:01, 28 August 2021 (UTC)

March 2022
Please do not add or change content, as you did at Nepal, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. - Arjayay (talk) 10:21, 29 March 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:48, 29 November 2022 (UTC)