User talk:Fjralph

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. The following links will help you begin editing on Wikipedia:
 * Welcome!
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Editing tutorial
 * Picture tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Naming conventions
 * Manual of Style


 * Please bear these points in mind while editing Wikipedia:
 * Respect copyrights – do not copy and paste text or images directly from other websites.
 * Maintain a neutral point of view – this is one of Wikipedia's core policies.
 * Take particular care while adding biographical material about a living person to any Wikipedia page and follow Wikipedia's Biography of Living Persons policy. Particularly, controversial and negative statements should be referenced with multiple reliable sources.
 * No edit warring or sock puppetry.
 * If you are testing, please use the Sandbox to [ do so].
 * Do not add troublesome content to any article, such as: copyrighted text, libel, advertising or promotional messages, and text that is not related to an article's subject. Deliberately adding such content or otherwise editing articles maliciously is considered vandalism; doing so will result in your account or IP being blocked from editing.
 * Do not use talk pages as discussion or forum pages as Wikipedia is not a forum.

The Wikipedia tutorial is a good place to start learning about Wikipedia. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and discussion pages using four tildes, like this: &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126; (the software will replace them with your signature and the date). Again, welcome!

Draft:Jasmin Vardimon
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Draft:Jasmin Vardimon, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://jasminvardimon.com/bio/jasmin-vardimon/.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 18:03, 17 August 2015 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Jasmin Vardimon (September 7)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted because it included copyrighted information, which is not permitted on Wikipedia.

You are welcome to write an article on the subject, but please do not use copyrighted work.


 * Draft:Jasmin Vardimon may be deleted at any time unless the copied text is removed. Copyrighted work cannot be allowed to remain on Wikipedia.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=User_talk:Fjralph Articles for creation help desk] or on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Happysailor&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=User_talk:Fjralph reviewer's talk page].
 * You can also get Wikipedia's Live Help real-time chat help from experienced editors.

- Happysailor  (Talk) 11:28, 7 September 2015 (UTC)

Reply
Hi, thanks for message. You can sign your comments automatically using four tildes ~. There were other problems with your article
 * it did not provide adequate independent verifiable sources to enable us to verify the facts and show that it meets the notability guidelines. It is now Wikipedia policy that biographical articles about living people must have independent verifiable references, as defined in the link, or they will be deleted. Sources that are not acceptable include those linked to her, social media and other sites that can be self-edited, blogs, websites of unknown or non-reliable provenance, and sites that are just reporting what she claims or interviewing her management. Not all your references met those criteria and, worryingly, none have url links so they are hard to verify
 * it was written in a promotional tone. Articles must be neutral and encyclopaedic. Examples of unsourced or inappropriately sourced claims presented as fact include: a leading force in British dance theatre for nearly twenty years, she has built a reputation for challenging, exciting and visually stunning dance and continues to add to the body of critically acclaimed, artistically respected yet accessible work both for her company and for some of the leading arts institutions she works with across the world...  there are many other selective quotes, which in any case have no place in a biography. The whole tone is promotional; Facts, not opinions please.
 * You have no wikilinks to other articles, eg choreographer
 * One external link to her main website only please

If you have a conflict of interest when editing this article, you must declare it. See also Best practices for editors with conflicts of interest. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially egregious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a black hat practice. Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists, and if it does not, from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly. Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, you are  required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:. The template Paid can be used for this purpose. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. If you are being compensated, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, please do not edit further until you answer this message. --Jimfbleak - talk to me?  09:06, 9 September 2015 (UTC)

Response to reply
Thank you for your prompt reply. I understand your corrections and notes and I will apply them straight away to my article.

I did not include hyperlinks within the references as I was following the guidelines of MLA 7th Edition referencing, but I will include hyperlinks, that is not a problem. Similarly, I will include wikilinks, that's not a problem at all.

And from your information I understand that I am not a paid advocate.

Since speaking to you and taking on board your advice and corrections, am I now able to start re-editing my article, so I can hopefully resubmit an updated and corrected version soon?

kind regards Fjralph Fjralph (talk) 11:23, 9 September 2015 (UTC)

Reply
Hi, thanks for message. First note that I will not see your messages unless you post on my talk page or you post here, starting with a link to my user name and signing your message using four tildes ~.

With regard to the question about conflict of interest, note that being an employee of the company amounts to paid advocacy. I have looked at the staff list] of the company on its website, and it seems likely to me that you are an employee. This does not absolutely debar you from editing, but any COI must be upfront

''I have since contacted the photographer of the image and have gained his approval for me to use the image on the article... I have to select whether the image is a free work, or instead copyrighted but fair use. Which option do you advise is most appropriate for my situation? ''&mdash; Neither.
 * You cannot have a fair use licence for a living person, since it's always possible to make a free one.
 * Only the photographer can release the image directly to us as a free work, since he owns the copyright. Copyrighted images are not allowed in Wikipedia, as outlined in this policy. That applies even to those created by you or your organisation, unless they state clearly and explicitly that they are public domain. There are other ways to donate copyrighted images to Wikipedia, as described here; please note that simply asserting on the talk page that you are the owner of the copyright, or you have permission to use the image isn't sufficient.
 * The alternative would be to take your own photograph, and then you can release it as a free work

Jimfbleak - talk to me?  12:27, 11 September 2015 (UTC)

Reference errors on 11 September
Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. as follows: Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/RBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/RBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=ReferenceBot%20–%20&section=new report it to my operator]. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:15, 12 September 2015 (UTC)
 * On the Draft:Jasmin Vardimon page, [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=680556832 your edit] caused a broken reference name (help) . ([ Fix] | [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&preload=User:ReferenceBot/helpform&preloadtitle=Referencing%20errors%20on%20%5B%5BSpecial%3ADiff%2F680556832%7CDraft:Jasmin Vardimon%5D%5D Ask for help])

reply
Hi Faye. Thanks for message. The point I was making is that if you have a COI, you must declare it. Even if you are editing in your own time, I think most people would see the fact that you are working for the company as a COI. That doesn't stop you editing the article, but you must be upfront about not being a disinterested editor, even if you write a perfectly neutral article.

I am creating this article purely due to my passion and interest... trying to offer information to share with others who similarly share this interest and/or would like to find out more&mdash; the point is that you are not here to write a fan page or preach to the converted, you have to write a factual article for a general audience. I think you have taken this on board, and I'll keep an eye on the article. Good luck with your job. Jimfbleak - talk to me?  11:05, 14 September 2015 (UTC)


 * I've made these edits, please check the history for details. I've formatted the first few refs using  to avoid bare urls, you should do the others. If you use ref name= and put the name in quotes, you must use straight quotes, not curly, I fixed a couple (or chose a one-word name and don't use quotes. Jimfbleak -  talk to me?  13:18, 14 September 2015 (UTC)

More
You seem to have deleted the entire section of Awards and Recognitions &mdash; none were referenced, and a kitchen sink list of everything they have ever achieved looks spammy. Some look pretty low level anyway. At a minimum you need to reference the awards, and you would do better to write in prose and concentrate on a few of the most notable.

 "A multi-award winning choreography", which is a fact and not purely promotional. &mdash; well, technically yes, but it's like "renowned", "world-famous" and the like, they look promotional even if true, and will attract the attention of admins and other patrollers (you have one on your back already, you really don't need more). Better to let the facts of the company speak for themselves rather than use PR talk

'' "In 2012, the Jasmin Vardimon Company relocated to Ashford, Kent, opening its new creative home, ‘The Jasmin Vardimon Production Space’", once again, is this not a fact? And if so, why have you chosen to delete it?'' &mdash; definitely a fact, and definitely copied verbatim from a copyrighted web page, not permitted. You have to rewrite in your own words (and not just a close paraphrase)''

Jimfbleak - talk to me?  13:57, 14 September 2015 (UTC)

More 2

 * You chose to cut a complete paragraph which began with "Vardimon’s movement is known for its unique mixture of physical theatre, quirky characterizations, innovative technologies, text and dance"&mdash;. It was copied verbatim from a copyrighted source, not permitted. It's clear in any case that the text was written by the company, and even if that were not the case, an opinion from a single source does not make it a verifiable objective fact. Who knows it? How do you know it's unique other than that the company says so.
 * Secondly, can I ask why you chose to delete the external links section&mdash;Maybe I'm just being dim, but did it ever have an external links section? If so can you give me a difference link or an exact date and time of the relevant edit? Usually ELs are removed if they are social media, YouTube etc. One link to the company's main website is OK if that helps
 * "It is a practical course designed to bridge the gap between student and professional life, and train participants as versatile and multi-disciplinary performers, whilst exploring the dialogue between theatre and dance, improving strength, endurance and technique." &mdash;I take your point, what about "It is a practical course designed to bridge the gap between student and professional life, and aims to train participants as versatile and multi-disciplinary performers by improving strength, endurance and technique."? That makes it an aim rather than probably unverifiable fact, and removes the "dialogue" bit which is non-factual padding

Jimfbleak - talk to me?  11:11, 16 September 2015 (UTC)


 * You are right, the ELs were in the deleted version. I have doubts about the wisdom of adding these. They aren't social media, but they are very selective positive reviews and commentary, which I'm not sure are appropriate here. It's the sort of thing which would be better on the company website. There seems no point to them beyond posting cherry-picked opinions, which isn't really appropriate in a factual article. Jimfbleak - talk to me?  12:20, 16 September 2015 (UTC)


 * Well, sooner or later someone other than the two of us is going to look at this article and may come to different conclusions about acceptability, and although you may find this difficult to believe there are people out there who are more critical than me, and might view it as cherry-picked and spammy in tone. If you feel you really must have some or all of these, a "Further reading" section might be a safer bet. If you could find someone who is critical of her, her management style or methods, that would give some much-needed balance to the piece Jimfbleak</b> - talk to me?  14:23, 16 September 2015 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Jasmin Vardimon has been accepted
<div style="border:solid 1px #57DB1E; background:#E6FFE6; padding:1em; padding-top:0.5em; padding-bottom:0.5em; width:20em; color:black; margin-bottom: 1.5em; margin-left: 1.5em; width: 90%;"> Jasmin Vardimon, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created. The article has been assessed as B-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article. You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. . Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia! Yossiea <sup style="color:green;">(talk) 18:01, 17 September 2015 (UTC)
 * If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the  [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_talk/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Jasmin_Vardimon help desk] .
 * If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider.

Speedy deletion nomination of Jasmin Vardimon Company


A tag has been placed on Jasmin Vardimon Company, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. -©2015 Compassionate727( Talk )( Contributions ) 17:00, 21 October 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 22
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Jasmin Vardimon Company, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages NHS and Big Dance. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:47, 22 October 2015 (UTC)