User talk:Flabshoe1/Archive 1

Proposed deletion of Constance Clarke


The article Constance Clarke has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "No sources tag has been up for nearly a year. No evidence of notability."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Bondegezou (talk) 10:39, 18 July 2018 (UTC)

Redirecting Doctor Who companions
Hi there, I see that you've turned a lot of pages for Doctor Who spin-off companions into redirects to List of companions in Doctor Who spin-offs. I imagine you're doing that because you're upset that your page for Liv Chenka was redirected. I understand how you feel, it's a pain when your work gets redirected, and other spin-off companions have similar pages. However, WP:POINT says that you shouldn't disrupt Wikipedia just to make a point. It would be better to talk on the Liv Chenka page about getting more sources to build up that page, rather than tear other pages down. I'm going to revert your redirects, but I'd be happy to help you with the Liv Chenka page, if you'd like. — Toughpigs (talk) 19:45, 9 September 2020 (UTC)

September 2020
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at articles in Category:Doctor Who spin-off companions. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted. Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. --John B123 (talk) 20:48, 9 September 2020 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

December 2020
Hello, I'm Ashleyyoursmile. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, BTS, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Ashley yoursmile!  12:12, 1 December 2020 (UTC)

Edit summaries
Just a reminder that you should leave an edit summary when you make a change to a page. Unless its something really minor like a '.' or a ',' that no one needs to double check. I noticed that you haven't them for any of your edits except the 1 or 2 where you reverted/corrected me. Doesn't have to be long or super detailed unless necessary. Egs for you: "added (name of award) to table" "typo fix" "sentence reword" "fixed Gaon 2020 soty ref" etc. Editors are encouraged to always use an edit summary wherever possible. -- Carlobunnie (talk) 18:37, 9 December 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for December 22
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited How You Like That, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Vogue. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:10, 22 December 2020 (UTC)

Added these awards also
Asian pop music awards,hallyu kpop awards,wowie awards,just jared awards Mochichipmunkkookie (talk) 08:46, 1 January 2021 (UTC)

Please add these awards also
Sse live awards,wowie awards,Hallyu kpop awards by kpopstarz,just Jared awards and joox Hong Kong awards and also top ten Asia awards Mochichipmunkkookie (talk) 20:28, 1 January 2021 (UTC)

Notability
Hi, please first gain consensus on Talk:List of awards and nominations received by Blackpink to determine whether those awards are notable enough to be included. Best regards, ɴᴋᴏɴ21  ❯❯❯  talk  22:01, 1 January 2021 (UTC)

Some one removed PAK award
So please add this Mochichipmunkkookie (talk) 04:52, 2 January 2021 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 30
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Doctor Who: The Monthly Adventures, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Romana.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:10, 30 March 2021 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 6
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Doctor Who: The Monthly Adventures, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Frobisher.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:56, 6 April 2021 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for May 5
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Rosé (singer), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Weibo.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:57, 5 May 2021 (UTC)

May 2021
Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Nessa Barrett, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use your sandbox for that. Thank you. CAMERAwMUSTACHE (talk) 23:56, 27 May 2021 (UTC)

Tudo Information Awards Consensus
Tudo Information Awards is a Brazilian award created by the Tudo Information website, one of the leading entertainment sites in Brazil: The official organizer website: https://www.tecduos.com.br/os-melhores-sites-de-entretenimento-do-brasil-ego-hugo-gloss-r7-tudo-information-e-outros/ <<<>>> It is carried out in partnership with Rádio Big FM Brasi and Awards are announced on https://www.tudoinformation.com.br/ also the same organizer associated with Break Tudo Awards https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/BreakTudo_Awards_2017.

I am looking forward for this award ceremony to be included among other awards of Blackpink ITIRIKBP (talk) 19:04, 6 June 2021 (UTC).

consensus
i am looking forward to receive consensus, I have provided links in the talk page, PS that award was added by you in the first place — Preceding unsigned comment added by ITIRIKBP (talk • contribs) 06:33, 11 June 2021 (UTC)

Edit Request
Hello, this is Inyourarea123, can I request an edit to the List of blackpink awards and nominations? Can you add 2 SSE Live Awards because Blackpink already won 2 awards last 2019 but until now it didn't included to their award list. SSE Live awards is a Big awards in UK from the company SSE, You can search it here in Wikipedia.

I hope you grant my request, Thank you!

Source:  Inyourarea123 (talk) 08:18, 12 June 2021 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for June 26
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Lisa (rapper), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Daum.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:57, 26 June 2021 (UTC)

Mid-year chart positions
Hi, I noticed that you added mid-year chart positions to a number of song articles. I've reverted your edits because there is no consensus for including those in the table. We only include weekly, monthly, and yearly charts. --Ashleyyoursmile (talk) 12:47, 22 July 2021 (UTC)

DYK for Chi Mat Ba Ram
Cwmhiraeth (talk) 12:02, 31 July 2021 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 5
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Companion (Doctor Who), you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Sally Morgan, Thicker than Water and Gods and Monsters.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:00, 5 August 2021 (UTC)

August 2021
Hello, I'm Rockysmile11. I noticed that you recently removed content from Brave Girls without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks.  Rocky smile 11 (talk) 00:29, 22 August 2021 (UTC)

September 2021
Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:


 * User contributions
 * Recent changes
 * Watchlists
 * Revision diffs
 * IRC channels
 * Related changes
 * New pages list
 * Article editing history

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. With a Wikipedia account you can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting. Thanks!  — Paper9oll  (🔔 • 📝)  01:55, 7 September 2021 (UTC)

October 2021
Thank you for your contributions. Please mark your edits, such as your recent edits to Lisa (rapper), as "minor" only if they are minor edits. In accordance with Help:Minor edit, a minor edit is one that the editor believes requires no review and could never be the subject of a dispute. Minor edits consist of things such as typographical corrections, formatting changes or rearrangement of text without modification of content. Additionally, the reversion of clear-cut vandalism and test edits may be labeled "minor". adding new information, as you did here, is not a minor edit. Alex (talk) 19:19, 20 October 2021 (UTC)

Column span
This might be commonplace on Korean artists' articles, but it's basically not done at all on non-US artists' articles, and it was entirely unnecessary to introduce. It's been removed. Also, please update the Bubbling Under citation access-date when you add a new Bubbling Under peak. Thanks.  Ss  112   05:19, 2 November 2021 (UTC)

Upkeep of new chart
Hi Flabshoe1....good job on updating the new chart Hot Trending Songs on the K-pop list (your edits here) and also Lisa's collaboration "SG", which I missed. Please consider doing a separate page for the Hot Trending Songs chart (like List of K-pop songs on the Billboard Japan Hot 100 and List of K-pop songs on the World Digital Song Sales chart). These two charts were split off recently, after discussion about the page size at the Talk page here - Page is too large, consider creating standalone articles. The new Hot Trending Songs chart had so many K-pop entries that I already considered it too bulky to add to the List page. That is why I listed the first week's entries for the Real-time and weekly charts and gave the readers the page link to view further updates and did not intend updating weekly. However, two new charts last year initially looked like they were going to be too bulky, but slowed down after their inauguration: Billboard Global 200 and Billboard Global Excl. U.S......so it's possible this newer chart will also slow down a bit (for the sake of the total List page size).

I appreciate your addition of the Hot Trending Songs chart updates for last week and further updates on a weekly basis.

Also, I added back the citation for the first week's charting. In the past, some new Billboard charts have been dropped by the magazine and the URL for them disappears and citations are necessary then, when the chart history disappears. Thanks a lot and enjoy editing!--Bonnielou2013 (talk) 00:32, 7 November 2021 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for November 8
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of Billboard Global 200 number ones of 2021, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bad Habits.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:57, 8 November 2021 (UTC)

Lisa & Rosé
Hello! I noticed that you always update the awards for BlackPink members. I was wondering if you could add this awards to Lisa and Rosé articles since users with no Wikipedia account are not allowed to edit their page. Both Lisa & Rosé are nominated at the 2021 TTMAwards, a Spanish awards. Lisa received 5 nominations: Artist of the Year, Song Of the Year (for Money), Best EDM Song (for SG), Best Dance Song (for Lalisa), Video of the Year (for Lalisa), and Rosé received 2 nominations: Best Dance Song (for On the Ground) and Video of the Year (for Gone). BlackPink also received nominations for Artist of the Year and Fandom Award. Please add them! Source: https://twitter.com/Shan_lilie/status/1465619111405182983

Forgot to say that both Lisa and Rosé are nominated at the 2021 Seoul Music Awards for two categories: Main Prize (Bonsang), and K-wave Special Award. Here's the source: https://twitter.com/bp_votingteam/status/1465938096084553733?s=21 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 94.129.69.78 (talk) 13:14, 1 December 2021 (UTC)

Stop the disruptive edits
Please stop plastering images as you like on the List of Billboard 200 number-one albums of 2021. Till the Nielsen annual best-sellers list comes out, we don't add "best-selling artist's image". This is the norm. As for the 2019 and 2020, I literally co-authored those articles and added images based on the #1 weeks and annual top song. LoL. So it would be great if you do not think I don't know the "precedents". I myself will add Adele's image if MRC Data/Nielsen names 30 the best-selling album of 2021. Look at this for example. This is how the best-selling album of 2021 will be announced in January 2022. We don't add images based on instantaneous news on articles that are about years and lists. I hope you'll take these information and advices, and learn. Ronherry (talk) 04:21, 11 December 2021 (UTC)

Disliking other Edits - Billboard Hits of the World
I've monitored your edits on Pink Venom and they are starting to verge on ownership. I understand you're a huge Black Pink fan but that doesn't mean you throw rules or common sense out of the window. I know that they have done well on Billboards Hits of the World charts but it is important to recognise that those are not national charts. There was a discussion about it [Wikipedia_talk:Record_charts#About_Billboard's_Hits_of_the_World_charts here] and here. it doesn't matter if an artist got number one on the hits of the world chart, if there is already an official IFPI-affiliated chart that is nationally recognised within the country, we should not be adding other charts just for the sake of it. We risk becoming WP:INDISCRIMINATE. Either way, the issue was discussed and it was decided not to use hits of the world. Furthermore, the ifnormation was removed, per WP:BRD you have been reverted/edits removed. The onus is on you to discuss and get consensus as there's no current consensus that we should be duplicating both Billboard charts with other local national chart providers. Do not undo/re-add the information without a consensus please. >> Lil-unique1  (  talk  ) — 09:03, 1 September 2022 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Rosé - Gone.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Rosé - Gone.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:33, 8 November 2022 (UTC)

Replaceable fair use File:Pink Venom Cover.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Pink Venom Cover.jpg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:


 * 1) Go to the file description page and add the text  below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing   with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
 * 2) On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on [ this link]. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification, per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. 2600:1700:9DD0:8FD0:D3E:958A:E648:89A8 (talk) 02:18, 21 November 2022 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Rosé - Gone.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Rosé - Gone.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:39, 24 November 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:31, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

Don't remove table captions
Hi. Please don't remove table captions as you did at Shut Down (Blackpink song); they are required for accessibility per WP:ACCESS and MOS:TABLECAPTION. Thanks.  Ss  112   12:45, 2 December 2022 (UTC)

April 2023
Hello. I have noticed that you edit without using an edit summary. Please do your best to always fill in the summary field. This helps your fellow editors use their time more productively, rather than spending it unnecessarily scrutinizing and verifying your work. Even a short summary is better than no summary, and summaries are particularly important for large, complex, or potentially controversial edits. To help yourself remember, you may wish to check the "prompt me when entering a blank edit summary" box in your preferences. Thanks! Lightoil (talk) 02:03, 11 April 2023 (UTC)

Rowspans on discographies
Hello. Flabshoe, I'm sure you're aware, but songs that were released years ago—at any time, as long as they are available on streaming services—can chart on charts that didn't exist at the time the songs were released. So putting rowspans for columns on Taeyang discography and wherever else, saying that the Vietnam Hot 100 or Billboard Global 200, or whatever the chart is, didn't exist at the time is pointless. Any of those songs could randomly get a surge because of some TikTok trend or virality, and chart. So then the note becomes useless. I suggest you stop this practice, and actively work to remove these notes where they are present, like the aforementioned discography, or I will do so myself. When the chart was created versus when the song was originally released is irrelevant. It doesn't prevent songs from charting in 2023. Thank you.  Ss  112   09:26, 9 May 2023 (UTC)

Nomination of List of Spotify Global 200 number ones of 2022 for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of Spotify Global 200 number ones of 2022 is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/List of Spotify Global 200 number ones of 2022 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished. Star cheers peaks news lost wars Talk to me 21:25, 24 May 2023 (UTC)

May 2023
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia by deliberately introducing incorrect information, as you did at List of best-selling girl groups. Don't inflate sales figures! Binksternet (talk) 20:56, 27 May 2023 (UTC)

June 2023
Constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, but your recent edits, such as those to List of best-selling girl groups, appear to be intentional disruptions designed to illustrate a point. Edits designed for the deliberate purpose of drawing opposition, including making edits you do not agree with or enforcing a rule in a generally unpopular way, are highly disruptive and can lead to a block or ban. If you feel that a policy is problematic, the policy's talk page is the proper place to raise your concerns. If you simply disagree with someone's actions in an article, discuss it on the article talk page or, if direct discussion fails, through dispute resolution. If consensus strongly disagrees with you even after you have made proper efforts, then respect the consensus, rather than trying to sway it with disruptive tactics. Thank you.  — Paper9oll  (🔔 • 📝)  13:44, 1 June 2023 (UTC)

ANI where your edits have been questioned
There is currently a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is User @Lightlylove keeps harassing me. Thank you. Another editor has brought up your edits and I have responded to their statement about your edits. Nil Einne (talk) 05:35, 14 June 2023 (UTC)

Leave sources under chart positions until a song is falling
Regarding your edits to The Weeknd discography, Playboi Carti discography and Madonna singles discography, please do not immediately remove the extra sources once the header sources have updated with the information. "Popular" rose on a number of charts this week and there's nothing to suggest it's not still ascending. As the song is actively charting, it's actually more of a detriment to remove the sources as they will just need to be restored next week if new peaks are achieved, and it's quicker to update if they're not removed as soon as the header sources update with the information. Wait until the song is falling down the chart before removing them. Thank you.  Ss  112   23:05, 30 June 2023 (UTC)


 * The song is not on any EP that released yet even the Episode 5 one, you can check it for yourself. So it is incorrect to say that. As for the sources for charts, that makes sense, thanks! Flabshoe1 (talk) 23:07, 30 June 2023 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Template:Jennie (singer)


A tag has been placed on Template:Jennie (singer) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, at Templates_for_discussion/Log/2023_June_7. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. -- wooden superman  08:26, 4 July 2023 (UTC)

Non-free use of File:BTS - Mic Drop.jpg
Thank you for uploading File:BTS - Mic Drop.jpg. However, there is a concern that the use of the image on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Non-free content. Details of this problem, and which specific criteria that the image may not meet, can be obtained by going to the image description page. If you feel that this image does meet those criteria, please place a note on the image description or talk page explaining why. Do not remove the di-fails NFCC tag itself.

An administrator will review this file within a few days, and having considered the opinions placed on the image page, may delete it in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion or remove the tag entirely. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. — Ирука13 04:38, 5 August 2023 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Rosé - Eyes Closed.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Rosé - Eyes Closed.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:46, 10 August 2023 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Jisoo
Template:Jisoo has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page.  — Paper9oll  (🔔 • 📝)  16:31, 23 August 2023 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Jennie (singer)
Template:Jennie (singer) has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page.  — Paper9oll  (🔔 • 📝)  16:31, 23 August 2023 (UTC)

video games
I be working on the removal of sub series on the List of best-selling video game franchises page could you check it looks ok before a move it User:Fanoflionking/Fanoflionking notes and make any changes necessary P+T
 * Fan Of Lion King 🦁 (talk) 06:41, 29 August 2023 (UTC)

Accolade tables
Hey, I just wanted to remind you that tables aren't a must-have for awards and nominations. If things are already described in prose form, there isn't a need (or requirement) to convert that to a table. Idk if this is a habit you developed specifically on K-related articles (or if someone told you that's how it has to be), but if you look at song and album articles for other genres, a lot of them use prose form. Many GA/FAs are this way also. I didn't wanna go around reverting you every single time you do this, but figured I'd atleast explain to you in a bit more detail why I have done it a few times. The PTD and YTC pages you recently converted were fine as is, so I'm not sure why you thought they needed the tables instead. -- Carlobunnie (talk) 15:22, 10 September 2023 (UTC)

Copying text without attribution
Please do not insert whole sentences you've copied from sources without indicating it's a quote. On Bongos (song), you copied nearly two whole sentences from this Variety source without putting it in your own words. This is a WP:COPYVIO problem, and you need to start phrasing things in your own words and putting quotes between quotation marks. Thank you.  Ss  112   21:35, 18 September 2023 (UTC)

File:Drake - Slime You Out.png
Greetings, I'm here regarding your revert on the cover art of "Slime You Out", maybe I might have missed your edit summary somewhere but I believe you can fully explain the purpose of your revert here. I see you also removed the cover on the single with the edit summary that reads "Cover same as album, not needed" however the album isn't yet released and we don't know the official cover of it like we thought the "Halle Berry" image would be the cover of the song but isn't. I hope you understand where I'm coming from and I was wondering if you would please undo your edits on both the file and article back to the official cover art. Thank you.  dxneo  (talk) 22:36, 25 September 2023 (UTC)

Nominating Blackpink article for GA or Featured Article
Hi @Flabshoe1, I know that you are one of the most active editor on Blackpink related articles. I'm just curious if you are interested in nominating Blackpink Wikipedia page for Good Article? or perhaps later into Featured article. I inquired on the talk page of editor User:Nkon21 and he is willing to help on the process if someone nominates Blackpink for Good article. I believe Blackpink article has a high chance of getting that status. List of awards and nominations received by Blackpink can also be considered for FL. Cjse23 (talk) 10:37, 27 September 2023 (UTC)


 * Hi, I am down to help Blackpink become a Good Article. However, I don’t know whether I qualify as a “significant contributor” of the page to be able to nominate it since I haven’t written most of it, just the header and two other paragraphs. As for the awards page, I can also help with that page as well but similar concern. Flabshoe1 (talk) 20:21, 27 September 2023 (UTC)
 * I just wanted to comment that I don't think anyone is going to point out that you aren't a significant contributor to Blackpink's article, as you added 28k bytes to the page and are are one of the top 10 users with the most edits to the article. I support if you (or both of us) nominate Blackpink's article for GA status. ɴᴋᴏɴ21  ❯❯❯  talk  02:14, 28 September 2023 (UTC)
 * In that case, once you believe the article is ready I'm okay with us nominating Blackpink's article for GA status. Flabshoe1 (talk) 03:19, 28 September 2023 (UTC)
 * So far so good, @Nkon21 has copy edited the article and more, @Flabshoe1 added info. I think the thing to work on next is to make sure there is no failed verification content with the inline citations, if ever there is, replace it with better source, then you guys can nominate it once you feel it's ready. Upon looking at the list of GA on Wikipedia, Blackpink article seems like it could easily pass the status and can be a FA candidate. Best, Cjse23 (talk) 21:14, 30 September 2023 (UTC)
 * I have also noticed a fair amount of WP:FORBESCON sources that need swapping in the article, as it's considered self published sources and not high-quality. Would you guys be able to assist in switching out those sources? ɴᴋᴏɴ21  ❯❯❯  talk  03:46, 1 October 2023 (UTC)
 * @Cjse23 Have you checked the article for any bits of information that fails verification? I read through the article and found most things to be verified, but perhaps not thoroughly as there may be some stuff that I missed. After we take care of this, I think I can go ahead and nominate the article for GA. (Note: the GA reviewer will pinpoint any spots that fail verification anyway). ɴᴋᴏɴ21  ❯❯❯  talk  19:53, 3 October 2023 (UTC)
 * @Nkon21 Yes, I checked every line in the Career section and added sources for the failed verification, but I probably missed some. I also checked some on Artistry, Legacy and cultural impact and below, but not every line. The article can probably be nominated already. Cjse23 (talk) 14:46, 4 October 2023 (UTC)
 * Ok great. Do you want to be a co-nominator? ɴᴋᴏɴ21  ❯❯❯  talk  15:42, 4 October 2023 (UTC)
 * Probably not, as I'm quite busy Cjse23 (talk) 17:19, 4 October 2023 (UTC)
 * @Flabshoe1, @Nkon21 Some of the references probably needed English Translated title Cjse23 (talk) 23:29, 4 October 2023 (UTC)
 * @Cjse23 Went through and added English translated titles where I saw them missing. Flabshoe1 (talk) 01:50, 5 October 2023 (UTC)

Hi There, Flabshoe1
I want to ask if you could please give me the calculations you archived of Blackpink's record sales, i want to fix them and add them in their sales at their discography page. Lightlylove (talk) 00:56, 21 October 2023 (UTC)


 * Hi @Lightlylove! I actually just re-did all the calculations of Blackpink's record sales. I've updated them on the best-selling girl groups page and updated Blackpink's discography page where needed with official sources only.Flabshoe1 (talk) 22:05, 1 January 2024 (UTC)

For All The Dogs: First Person Shooter
First Person Shooter is not a single. There is no source stating it as such. Please stop making unsourced changes. Lilwaynecharts (talk) 01:59, 26 November 2023 (UTC)

WT:ACCESS thread about you (among others) and Template:Sronly and table captions
You might be interested in Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Accessibility, where you were mentioned prominently, but by someone using a template, which I don't think was appropriate. — SMcCandlish ☏ ¢ 😼  01:03, 27 November 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:50, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

December 2023
Hi. The images you added at List of Billboard Hot 100 number ones of 2023 were removed by me as they did not follow the norm for the article—images are for songs/artists that spent multiple weeks atop the chart. Not all artists who went #1 can have a picture therefore we have to follow a notability criterion. Here, the criterion using the longest running songs at #1. Regards.  ℛonherry  ☘  09:13, 5 December 2023 (UTC)


 * Hi! I request you to participate in a helpful conversation here before making no-brainer reverts. All the Billboard Hot 100 #1 list articles follow the same norm. Not all artists get images. It's not an "everybody gets one" format. Due weightage is important. Songs that ruled the chart for a long time can get images. Any other significant feats are covered in the lead. Instead of resorting to disruptive editing, please accept your burden and initiate constructive talk page discussion if you feel you want to help the articles.  ℛonherry  ☘  09:42, 25 December 2023 (UTC)

How You Like That
Hi, why doesn't How You Like That appear certified gold on the Spanish certification site when I click on the source? Blink03 (talk) 16:47, 12 January 2024 (UTC)


 * Hi, I don't know why it doesn't appear on that page, but I updated the reference to the award search page which does show the certification. Let me know if you can't see it! Flabshoe1 (talk) 17:28, 12 January 2024 (UTC)

Stylizations
I really don't think parenthetical stylization notes are an important thing for 99% of pop music cases. If you wish to add these trivial sentence-disrupting notes, please start a talk page thread at Talk:Ariana Grande or a related talk page that can gain more traction than the talk page of one of the songs. Pop music articles never should have started this silly trend, because any musician "writing song titles like this" is really not important when editors know on Wikipedia we disregard stylizations everywhere anyway per MOS:CT and MOS:CAPS. Also, started the article for Yes, And? and I believe it was his choice not to put the stylization note there and his hidden message. The point isn't saying MOS:CAPS forbids it, it's that it doesn't tell us it's important to do either. As I said, please gain consensus per WP:BRD for the apparent importance of these trivial details before re-including them because I really do not believe they are. And it's definitely not a minor edit at all. Thank you.  Ss  112   23:45, 22 January 2024 (UTC)

File:Nicki Minaj - Pink Friday 2 (Gag City Deluxe).jpg listed for discussion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Nicki Minaj - Pink Friday 2 (Gag City Deluxe).jpg, has been listed at Files for discussion. Please see the to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. >> Lil-unique1  (  talk  ) — 22:08, 27 January 2024 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 29
An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.
 * Big Foot (Nicki Minaj song)
 * added a link pointing to Complex
 * Hiss (song)
 * added a link pointing to Complex

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:48, 29 January 2024 (UTC)

Discography table standard
Hello Flabshoe1. Just to let you know, we do not typically list certifications from countries that do not have charts listed on the page. Even if the table is not overloaded and the artist doesn't have many certifications in general, it is considered standard practice on discographies to not list other countries' certifications.  Ss  112   06:23, 2 February 2024 (UTC)


 * Thanks for the reminder, have updated Lisa's page accordingly. Flabshoe1 (talk) 16:27, 2 February 2024 (UTC)

D4
Per a discussion at WP:ACCESS, to remove sr-only templates, there would have to be a strong showing that hiding redundant captions violated some kind of principle or goal, but there is zero evidence of that anywhere. Thus, I am going to restore them, especially since I am planning to bring the article up to GA. ɴᴋᴏɴ21  ❯❯❯  talk  21:41, 9 February 2024 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Nicki Minaj - Everybody.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Nicki Minaj - Everybody.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:37, 12 February 2024 (UTC)

Infobox Chronology
The chronology is not supposed to be only topics with an article. Prior to "Yes, And?", the song Carey released or was featured on is e-lie's single "Circles" which features Mariah. It was released June 2, 2023 as seen here. "It's A Wrap" was Mariah's last single as a lead artist, it was released February 10, 2023 as seen here and therefore, it "Circles" not "It's a Wrap" was her last released song. I don't know why that was so hard for you to understand? >> Lil-unique1  (  talk  ) — 22:03, 16 February 2024 (UTC)


 * No source shows that this song is an official single and not a promotional single. Please let's be civil. Flabshoe1 (talk) 22:05, 16 February 2024 (UTC)
 * That's double standards. A promotional single needs to be released in aid of something. The same could be said of "It's a Wrap" which was only released because of the boost and use it was receiving on TikTok. The lead artist is e-lie and doesn't have an album, tour or project that the song is released in promotion of therefore it's plain and simple a single. A commercial release should and is considered a single unless its released in specific need of something such as a countdown to an album/iTunes/promo single. I wasn't not being civil so apologies if it came across like that. Also please pay attention to WP:BRD - you were reverted/your edit was changed - the onus/responsibility is now on YOU to get a consensus/discuss/support for your edit. >>  Lil-unique1  (  talk  ) — 22:20, 16 February 2024 (UTC)
 * No worries, maybe I misinterpreted the end of your first talk page comment. And understood about the edit process. Flabshoe1 (talk) 22:19, 16 February 2024 (UTC)
 * For avoidance of doubt, I was able to find several mentions of song and not a single one call "Circles" a promotional single: SportPlaylists.com, BeatSource - Release of the Week, Daily Telegraph, Yahoo!, Golden Central Victoria. In future, I'd recommend you do a thorough search and actually establish facts before assuming you are correct or that someone is incorrect. I saw at the Talk: Yes, And? page, you accused another editor of not being civil when they pointed out a mistake, its not being not civil to do this - sorry if you've felt that way. >> Lil-unique1  (  talk  ) — 22:21, 16 February 2024 (UTC)
 * In that situation, the other editor agreed they did go too far and removed the sentence which was perceived as uncivil, so not trying to overuse that term. Flabshoe1 (talk) 22:25, 16 February 2024 (UTC)
 * Keep up the (generally) good work. You're keen and passionate - that makes a good start for a wiki editor! >> Lil-unique1  (  talk  ) — 22:26, 16 February 2024 (UTC)
 * I appreciate that, and I'll definitely work on establishing facts via research before assuming like you said - I see your point regarding "Circles". Flabshoe1 (talk) 22:33, 16 February 2024 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

 * The barnstar is very much appreciated! I'm always glad to have a productive discussion, and that contributes to making Wikipedia a better place. I'm always striving to improve, and maybe we'll cross paths again like you said. Flabshoe1 (talk) 02:32, 17 February 2024 (UTC)

Invitation to join New pages patrol
Hello Flabshoe1! Thank you for your consideration. We hope to see you around! MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:20, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
 * The New Pages Patrol is currently struggling to keep up with the influx of new articles needing review. We could use a few extra hands to help.
 * We think that someone with your activity and experience is very likely to meet the guidelines for granting.
 * Reviewing/patrolling a page doesn't take much time, but it requires a strong understanding of Wikipedia’s CSD policy and notability guidelines.
 * Kindly read the tutorial before making your decision, and feel free to post on the project talk page with questions.
 * If patrolling new pages is something you'd be willing to help out with, please consider applying here.

Feb 2023
Your recent edit on The Tortured Poets Department was reverted because it does not adhere to Wikipedia's policy of reliable sources and was based on original research. Please stick to the sources. Thanks.  ℛonherry  ☘  12:25, 23 February 2024 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for February 27
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Tally (song), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page F-word.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:09, 27 February 2024 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 5
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Ddu-Du Ddu-Du, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Cosmopolitan.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 18:08, 5 March 2024 (UTC)

Please stop using "promotional graphics" in place of cover artworks
Hello Flabshoe1. I have removed the two uploads you have just added to K-pop articles as makeshift/equivalent cover artworks. As I linked in my two edit summaries, users were in consensus in February/early March at that unless it is a cover artwork, it should not be used in the cover= parameter. This includes posters, video thumbnails, etc. Thanks.  Ss  112   02:31, 16 April 2024 (UTC)


 * Understood, thanks. Flabshoe1 (talk) Flabshoe1 (talk) 13:52, 16 April 2024 (UTC)