User talk:Flamenc

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:39, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Regarding percieved bias
Hi Flamenc, just so you know. One of my upcoming projects is vastly expanding the article on racism in Spain and I will write and reference a lot there about specifically Spanish racism (which is actually also a fascinating topic!). I am being very methodical about this and I'm not specifically targeting Catalans. Please don't think I am biased. Note there is also an article on Catalanophobia on wikipedia, which requires further research. I suggest we work on that one together? Sonrisas1 (talk) 12:02, 24 October 2017 (UTC)


 * Flamenc: Let's take a break and discuss tomorrow. Maybe we can find a solution somehow. If you want to create an article on Castilian supremacism for example I will assist you. I am not Castilian myself, and I could actually find a way of making a coherent article out of it. Sonrisas1 (talk) 18:11, 24 October 2017 (UTC)
 * I don't need any help and don't want to write anything. The only thing I Want is to neutralise this article. Every time I add something to make the article less hard (less hard than SCC you quote, and that is not an enciclopaedic source). There just is no evidence to find about supremacism in serious literature, outside political pamphlets from unionist groups (they have the right of their opinion). It's also strange that you mainly quote the media from the Spanish unionist point of view. Everytime I introduce some nuances, you erase them (e.g.: "some intellectuals" you systematically replace by "all" without any serious source, be so kind not to do this anymore. That's it for now.--Flamenc (talk) 12:21, 25 October 2017 (UTC)

I left a note
Hi Flamenc. I left you a note here. --Scolaire (talk) 19:23, 20 November 2017 (UTC)

Thanks, --Flamenc (talk) 19:28, 20 November 2017 (UTC)

Email
Thanks for your email. However, I don't want to be in regular correspondence with anybody outside of Wikipedia, so I've disabled my email again. With regard to your concern, my advice would be to let it go. Things will calm down. Scolaire (talk) 10:24, 27 November 2017 (UTC)