User talk:Flames2112

Speedy deletion of CDPulse Independent Music Distribution Service
A tag has been placed on CDPulse Independent Music Distribution Service, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read our the guidelines on spam as well as the Business' FAQ for more information.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on |the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Dethme0w (talk) 05:04, 30 January 2008 (UTC)

 D u s t i talk 19:25, 31 January 2008 (UTC) Please stop removing speedy deletion notices from pages that you have created yourself. If you continue, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia.  D u s t i talk 20:02, 31 January 2008 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to introduce inappropriate pages to Wikipedia you will be blocked from editing.  D u s t i talk 20:02, 31 January 2008 (UTC)

I made a whole new page CDPulse but it also got flagged for deletion. What should I do to make it qualify as an encyclopedia page? Flames2112 (talk) 20:07, 31 January 2008 (UTC)


 * My advice, as I was the one who flagged it, would be to have more useful information in the article, and try to make it sound less like advertising. If you want more help, let me know here D u s t i talk 18:04, 1 February 2008 (UTC)


 * After reviewing the article, and noticing the changes you have made, I have decided to allow it to stay, and have removed the speedy delete template. For future reference, do not remove speedy delete tags from an article you have created. Thank you,  D u s t i talk 19:48, 1 February 2008 (UTC)

Black Mountain Productions Inc
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Black Mountain Productions Inc, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://www.blackmountainproductions.net. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 20:04, 4 February 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Black Mountain Productions Inc
A tag has been placed on Black Mountain Productions Inc requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a company or corporation, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for companies and corporations.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Chris (talk) 20:11, 4 February 2008 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of CDPulse


The article CDPulse has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Apparently now non-existent website and either way it seemed questionably notable and improvable as my searches found nothing better than a few passing mentions. This is even almost speedy material but not entirely so here we are with PROD.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on |the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. SwisterTwister  talk  23:38, 4 December 2015 (UTC)