User talk:Flash Flood Warning/sandbox

Next Steps
I think your next step would probably be to verify all the existing information and add citations. Hopefully, in that process, you'll be able to naturally extend the information using the sources you've found. This may also illuminate areas that need more expansion.

Ideas for Expansion
As it stands, the article is pretty short. I think that the Rewilding (conservation biology) page is an excellent model for depth of content. One thing that I found really helped me was to take some time and explore the current writing on Wikipedia. You want to make sure that you're adding to the existing knowledge base, and not repeating things that already exist. So take some time to read articles from conservation science, and ensure that you're filling in a hole. I feel like this article has a lot of holes for the history of revegetation. I'm not an expert on this topic, but I feel like there's a lot of cool stuff I've heard about that isn't reflected here.

"See Also" section
I would definitely remove the Tubestock article from the "See Also" section. It only has a short paragraph of information. The articles in this section should help the reader explore topics, so make sure that you're linking articles that have good content. Again, I think the Rewilding (conservation biology) is a great addition. Maybe Species reintroduction, too?

Bham phys (talk) 16:36, 18 November 2019 (UTC)