User talk:Flat Out/Archives/2017/February

Regarding Look At Yourself upcoming album by Emmure
I saw you left a message on my talk page, but I don't know how I can respond to it there as I didn't see a reply link or anything. My question is basically do I just have to wait until the day the album is released to add this article? There are famous bands with upcoming albums all the time so I don't see how this isn't being accepted because "no major sources are talking about it" or something. The idea is that the album was announced, and my sources verified this. Obviously there are no reviews or mass talkings about it yet because it doesn't come out for another month. Not trying to be rude but am I missing something? — Preceding unsigned comment added by OfficialRecurrence (talk • contribs) 09:24, 31 January 2017 (UTC)
 * please read WP:TOOSOON Flat Out (talk) 11:38, 2 February 2017 (UTC)

New Page Review - newsletter No.2
Hello , We now have New Page Reviewers! Most of us requested the user right at PERM, expressing a wish to be able to do something about the huge backlog, but the chart on the right does not demonstrate any changes to the pre-user-right levels of October. The backlog is still steadily growing at a rate of 150 a day or 4,650 a month. Only 20 reviews a day by each reviewer over the next few days would bring the backlog down to a managable level and the daily input can then be processed by each reviewer doing only 2 or 3 reviews a day - that's about 5 minutes work! It didn't work in time to relax for the Xmas/New Year holidays. Let's see if we can achieve our goal before Easter, otherwise by Thanksgiving it will be closer to. Remember that we are the only guardians of quality of new articles, we alone have to ensure that pages are being correctly tagged by non-Reviewer patrollers and that new authors are not being bitten. This is even more important and extra vigilance is required considering Orangemoody,  and
 * A HUGE backlog
 * Second set of eyes
 * Abuse
 * 1) this very recent case of paid advertising by a Reviewer resulting  in  a community ban.
 * 2) this case in January of paid advertising by a Reviewer, also resulting in  a community ban.
 * 3) This Reviewer is indefinitely blocked for sockpuppetry.

Coordinator election
Kudpung is stepping down after 6 years as unofficial coordinator of New Page Patrolling/Reviewing. There is enough work for two people and two coords are now required. Details are at NPR Coordinators; nominate someone or nominate yourself. Date for the actual suffrage will be published later. Discuss this newsletter here. If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself from the mailing list MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 06:11, 5 February 2017 (UTC)

Hi I respect that you don't want your AC/DC page mucked about with, & that you do a lot've great work on here, but please understand it was never my intention to 'vandalise' it, not at all - more to tell the whole truth, as people are confused about what nationality AC/DC are - Obviously they're Australian principally yet with 2 British - 1 Scottish, 1 English - lead singers & spent a lot've formative time in UK; I think it's worth mentioning that for the balance; that they're an Australian band with British singers, as it's part of their history. Regards AmyMoosey (talk) 10:56, 11 February 2017 (UTC)
 * thanks for your note AmyMoosey. We use the country the band was formed in, as the article focus is the band, not the individual members. Also, there's a clear note in the article that asks editors to discuss before editing that section. Cheers Flat Out (talk) 13:14, 11 February 2017 (UTC)

AFC
Hi Flat Out, I edited the draft: Brain Preservation Foundation article to meet your prior comments. The draft article is very tight now. I removed anything that was not directly about the Foundation and everything is supported by independent references. On the subject of notability: References 1 - 6 are all written by credible, independent organization, such as Smithsonian and NPR, and explicitly mention BPF. References 7 & 8 are articles published in credible, independent scientific journals describing brain preservation methods that were developed to compete for the BPF Small Mammal prize. References 9 - 19 are articles published in credible, independent publishers such as Scientific American, Popular Science, Newsweek, New Scientist, etc. that explicitly covered BPF's announcement. I think that 19 credible, independent references is more than the average wikipedia article. Craig — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:801:201:E8C8:B457:DBA4:13CD:DBDC (talk) 23:31, 12 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Thanks for your post, I reviewed the current version after your last edit. The references are all allowed but they don't establish notability. They are almost all coverage of an announcement that the BPF has made. Please see the golden rule.Flat Out (talk) 23:58, 12 February 2017 (UTC)

PJW draft
Do you think the sources I just added to Draft:Paul Joseph Watson put him over the bar for notability? Everymorning (talk) 04:43, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Everymorning a quick look suggests no, sorry. Flat Out (talk) 11:48, 15 February 2017 (UTC)

I couldn't agree more
With this. two or three years ago there was someone with that copped the same attitude when taken to AN/I. I think the editing pattern was different but a block was the outcome. I wish my dusty old memory banks could come up with a name. Anyway thanks for that post. It brought a smile to an otherwise crummy day. Happy editing whenever possible and cheers. MarnetteD&#124;Talk 02:59, 16 February 2017 (UTC)

Draft:Aviva Directory
Hi, Flat Out. I read the articles you suggested and tightened up Draft:Aviva Directory as per your note. I have added an couple of publications which cited Aviva Directory and no other as their authoratitive source. One is a Law Review note and the other a chapter in a repot to the European Union.

Could you please take a look at the draft at your leisure?

Thank you!

ObadiahKatz (talk) 07:24, 16 February 2017 (UTC)

New Page Review-Patrolling: Coordinator elections
Your last chance to nominate yourself or any New Page Reviewer, See Wikipedia talk:New pages patrol/Coordination. Elections begin Monday 20 February 23:59 UTC. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 08:17, 19 February 2017 (UTC)

New Page Review - newsletter No.3
Hello , Voting for coordinators has now begun HERE and will continue through/to 23:59 UTC Monday 06 March. Please be sure to vote. Any registered, confirmed editor can vote. Nominations are now closed. We now have New Page Reviewers but despite numerous appeals for help, the backlog has NOT been significantly reduced. If you asked for the New Page Reviewer right, please consider investing a bit of time - every little helps preventing spam and trash entering the mainspace and Google when the 'NO_INDEX' tags expire. Discuss this newsletter here. If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself from the mailing list. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:35, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Still a MASSIVE backlog