User talk:Flatiron 230

Seeking assistance with Burson-Marsteller
To whomever may read this: I wish to improve the Wikipedia article about the global PR firm Burson-Marsteller (B-M), although as explained on my user page, I work with B-M and recognize I have a conflict of interest issue to manage. The article is not very good and few editors appear interested in it, so I would like to fix that. Since 2007 it has been "flagged" as substandard, and it very much is. So I have spent several months preparing a much more complete version, carefully sourced and as neutral as I can be, from my perspective. Because my draft (posted now in a user sub-page) is significantly longer, I realize it may be easier to go section by section, but if you are willing to look at the whole thing, I can help answer questions about the company and the draft. I have also posted a longer explanation and request on the B-M talk page, and I will see it if you respond there. Thanks in advance. Flatiron 230 (talk) 17:52, 6 May 2011 (UTC)


 * I moved your version to mainspace -- see more comments in the article's talk page at Talk:Burson-Marsteller. :) Banaticus (talk) 00:39, 7 May 2011 (UTC)


 * Thank you! I am amazed how quickly this worked out. Flatiron 230 (talk) 14:06, 9 May 2011 (UTC)


 * File:Burson-marsteller Logo.png, has been listed at Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed (no source is listed). If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. You can also just to go to the image page, add a source, remove the deletion discussion template.  The usual practice is to list the website that the image was obtained from like http://www.burson-marsteller.com/ or something.  Banaticus (talk) 23:45, 9 May 2011 (UTC)


 * I presume it is copyrighted and that its source is from the website. I will double-check and if that is correct, I will make the change you have suggested. Thank you. Flatiron 230 (talk) 12:38, 10 May 2011 (UTC)


 * I don't know if you're still watching this page, but does Burston have a logo on a transparent background for the infobox? The current image is on a white background, which creates a white box inside the grey infobox. Corporate 01:08, 6 November 2012 (UTC)