User talk:Flaviaeulalia

Flaviaeulalia, you are invited on a Wikipedia Adventure!
 The Adventure

Speedy deletion nomination of Truemen


A tag has been placed on Truemen, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Gbawden (talk) 12:02, 23 July 2015 (UTC)

Reply
Hi, thanks for message. I deleted your article because
 * it did not provide adequate independent verifiable sources to enable us to verify the facts and show that it meets the notability guidelines. Although you gave references, most did not meet the linked requirements. In summary, articles written by the company or its employees, social media, blogs, sites of unknown provenance or sources just repeating what the company says are not acceptable third-party sources. Even the claim of a sigma award is sourced to your boss rather than the awarding body. And you don't explain what that award is.
 * You are so busy puffing the company that you didn't bother giving any real facts to show if it is notable. How many employees? Turnover? Profits? I simply can't tell whether it is notable or not from what you have written.
 * it was written in a promotional tone. Articles must be neutral and encyclopaedic.
 * Your article is a fact-free sales leaflet, and, bizarrely, the thoughts of your founders are given a bigger section than core values!
 * Examples of unsourced or self-sourced claims presented as fact include: It also received an ISO Certification from TUV South Asia in 2006 in just 18 months from the company's incorporation, making it the youngest recruitment consultancy in the world at that time to receive the quality certification... It services the requirements of IT companies all around the world... As a thought provoker (whole section)... Truemen has always been interested in contributing to quality and enhanced processes... Unique industry initiative... Truemen has always been interested in moving the HR and recruitment industry forward through unique initiatives... unique collaboration ... Truemen's founders are passionate towards increasing efficiencies in recruitment processes across industry and have as such been involved in the development of a number of process in Cloud based systems to promote analytics and performance enhancement in the HR and recruitment field which is still an area for great potential and growth...


 * Not a reason for deletion, but you didn't link a single word in the text to another article such as Bangalore
 * You have an obvious conflict of interest when it comes to editing articles about this subject. If, after reading the information about notability linked above, you still believe that your organisation is notable enough for a Wikipedia article (and that there is significant coverage in reliable, independent secondary sources), you could, if you wish, post a request at Requested articles for the article to be created. See also Best practices for editors with conflicts of interest.

This is an encyclopaedia, not a free platform to advertise your company. The article needs rewriting from scratch, although if you want the code for the infobox let me know Jimfbleak - talk to me?  06:01, 24 July 2015 (UTC)