User talk:Flaviobm

Olivia Wilde
Hi, please have a look at WP:NONFREE. Because Wikipedia is a free encyclopedia, we only use nonfree images when there is no possible alternative. In articles about living people, free images must be used, with very few exceptions. Thanks. --Bongwarrior (talk) 18:12, 9 October 2008 (UTC)

Vandalism
Your nice words on Dilma Rousseff's article will be reported to one of the admins.Denisxavier (talk) 20:56, 6 November 2010 (UTC) Since when telling the truth is "vandalism"?

Dilma Roussef
Do not keep changing "military dictatorship" to "regime" in this article. First of all you are breaking a link to the article about the military dictatorship (Brazil) - secondly you are not giving any reason for your change. If you want to change it you will have to argue your case at the talk page - not WP:EDITWAR. If you keep reverting without arguments you will only end up getting blocked.·Maunus· ƛ · 20:42, 8 November 2010 (UTC)

Blocked
You have been blocked temporarily from editing for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. You have been blocked from editing for 48 hours for editwarring at Dilma Roussef and for failing to respond to several invitations to discuss the changes that you wish to introduce. Please take this chance to read up on wikipedia's policies on editwarring and how we achieve consensus through discussion.·Maunus· ƛ · 22:18, 8 November 2010 (UTC)

April 2011
Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute to the encyclopedia, but when you add or change content, as you did to the article Green Lantern (film), please cite a reliable source for the content of your edit. This helps maintain our policy of verifiability. See Citing sources for how to cite sources, and the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. "Poor" is the discription used in the source, do not change it without adding an equally reliable source. Thank you. --TriiipleThreat (talk) 00:55, 2 April 2011 (UTC)

Please do not add or change content without verifying it by citing reliable sources, as you did to Green Lantern (film). Before making any potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. --TriiipleThreat (talk) 15:53, 3 April 2011 (UTC)

The Dark Knight Rises
You're not going crazy. I keep removing "largely". First, it's considered a peacock term. Secondly, it's inaccurate for what you're decribing. "Largely" cannot describe a review's level of positivity, because "largely" is a description for size. Last, we do not need multiple qualifiers in the same sentence. Given that "positive" is a qualifier by itself, we do not need to qualify the qualifier (e.g., saying "largely positive" when just "positive" is enough). Please do not add "largely" or anything similar to the article.  BIGNOLE     (Contact me)  00:42, 19 July 2012 (UTC)

Blocked
You have been blocked from editing for a period of one week for edit warring, as you did at The Dark Knight Rises. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.  Tide  rolls  01:47, 19 July 2012 (UTC)

Rolling Stones - Grrr! 2 disc edition
Why do you keep deleting the 2disc edition tracklist for the Grrr! compilation? It exists, I have it in my hand. If for some reason you do not believe me, then take a look at this: http://www.jbhifionline.com.au/music/pop-rock/grrr-40-tracks/673353 If you could explain why you keep deleting it, then we can work something out. Nerd 101 (talk) 23:16, 20 November 2012 (UTC)

August 2015
Please do not add defamatory content to Wikipedia, as you did to Dan Savage, especially if it involves living persons. Thank you. - MrX 17:35, 20 August 2015 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add defamatory content, as you did at Dan Savage, you may be blocked from editing. - MrX 17:50, 20 August 2015 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add defamatory content, as you did at Dan Savage. - MrX 18:00, 20 August 2015 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for persistent vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text below this notice:. &mdash; MusikAnimal  talk  18:03, 20 August 2015 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 72 hours for contravening Wikipedia's biographies of living persons policy. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text below this notice:. 5 albert square (talk) 19:23, 23 August 2015 (UTC)

I am tempted to make this block indefinite. What you were doing here is absolutely against Wikipedia policy. Are you unclear on WP:BLP, or WP:NPOV, our policies on biographies of living persons and on neutral point of view in articles? If they are not policies you are willing to abide by you will be permanently blocked. Georgewilliamherbert (talk) 19:50, 23 August 2015 (UTC)


 * Further to what has said above, I was tempted to make the block permanent but I have extended good faith to you and I am willing to give you one final chance.  I suggest that you use the 3 day block to familiarise yourself with the policies mentioned above.  I will watch your edits from now on and if you carry on editing in the same pattern when you return then the next block will be indefinite.--5 albert square (talk) 21:47, 23 August 2015 (UTC)

it continueth –Roscelese (talk &sdot; contribs) 17:17, 28 August 2015 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is only being used to contravene Wikipedia's biographies of living persons policy. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text below this notice:.  Tide  rolls  18:21, 28 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Your block log states this is a WP:BLP related block. My advice would be that you also familiarize your self with WP:TE, WP:BRD and WP:EW before presenting an unblock request.  Tide  rolls  18:21, 28 August 2015 (UTC)