User talk:Flcelloguy

Archives:
 * The Complete and Unabridged Edition of the Archives
 * The First Archive: From the Beginnings to Adminship
 * The Second Archive: The Early Steps of Adminship
 * The Third Archive: Adminship Expands to Mediatorship
 * The Fourth Archive: From Mediatorship to Guiding Esperanza
 * The Fifth Archive: Half a year and counting
 * The Sixth Archive: Editing into 2006
 * The Seventh Archive: The 100 Message Archive
 * The Eighth Archive: Double A, the April to August 2006 archive
 * The Ninth Archive: A new year, a new role
 * The Tenth Archive: COMING SOON

RFA Thanks
I would like to thank you for your support in my recent RFA. As you may or may not be aware, it passed with approximately 99% support. I ensure you that I will use the tools well, and if I ever disappoint you, I am open to recall. If you ever need anything, don't hesitate to leave me a note on my talkpage. Thanks again, ^ demon [omg plz] 20:39, 25 March 2007 (UTC)

Featured article review of Supreme Court of the United States
Supreme Court of the United States has been nominated for a featured article review. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. Please leave your comments and help us to return the article to featured quality. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, articles are moved onto the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Remove" the article from featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. Reviewers' concerns are here. King of &hearts;   &diams;   &clubs;   &spades;  15:56, 28 March 2007 (UTC)

Checkuser
I added my name to the checkuser requests list. I understand that you are opposed to the process being done this way and I must say, I'm not sure this is a good approach. That said, I'm not sure what would be a good approach, assuming more checkusers are required. Perhaps admins requesting checkusers frequently, though most cases of sockpuppetry can be resolved without RFCUs. --Yamla 04:13, 30 March 2007 (UTC)

Answer
I have emailed you with an answer to your question. Danny 02:12, 8 April 2007 (UTC)

I have responded to you. Danny 19:18, 8 April 2007 (UTC)

Civility
I was impressed by the civility I've seen in your comments and discussions, and just wanted to leave a note of appreciation. Comments like yours, such as at the RfA talk pages, keep me (and probably a lot of other users, as well) from getting too discouraged over not-so-civil comments. Thanks again. *Vendetta* (whois talk edits) 19:24, 9 April 2007 (UTC)

Re: School of the Art Institute of Chicago
Hi, thanks for helping out a couple of months ago with splitting the article into 2 sections, but I just noticed that Art Institute of Chicago and School of the Art Institute of Chicago share the same talk pages. Can they be separated or is this how it should be to retain the history of discussion? --SquatGoblin 08:14, 15 April 2007 (UTC)

Photograph Dispute on the B-36 Article Page
This particular issue goes awhile back. I've done the suggested advice and let the situation cool down before I attempt to resolve this situation.

This is the problem, the user Rogerd has been trying to put his personal photograph on the B-36 article. He does not hide the fact that he took it since it is featured on his personal photograph gallery http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Rogerd/photo_gallery

I feel very strongly that he is bias towards his photograph versus the official U.S. Air Force photograph taken of the same aircraft, which in my opinion, is of better quality and is not crooked. In addition, this photograph does not show any museum spectators and does not obsecure the aircraft from view and shows more of the aircraft http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:060315-F-1234P-001.jpg

I feel that I was unfairly overwhelmed by his inner circle of users on Wiki and the dispute is still unresolved in my opinion.

-Signaleer 18:46, 16 April 2007 (UTC)

Xiangqi FAR
Xiangqi has been nominated for a featured article review. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. Please leave your comments and help us to return the article to featured quality. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, articles are moved onto the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Remove" the article from featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. Reviewers' concerns are here. LuciferMorgan 15:05, 30 April 2007 (UTC)

Photograph Dispute?
What is this in reference to? -Signaleer 06:55, 9 May 2007 (UTC)


 * Yes, by all means--I would like to have a consensus of the photograph. -Signaleer 06:33, 10 May 2007 (UTC)

Template:ArbCom candidate
Hi Flcelloguy. You created ArbCom candidate for the January 2006 Arbcom elections and said you would delete it when those elections were over. The format the candidate stats are listed in doesn't seem to have been used in the most recent election, so is there any more use, or would you like to delete it now? Picaroon (Talk) 23:00, 12 May 2007 (UTC)

Better source request for Image:Gavel.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Gavel.jpg. You provided a source, but it is difficult for other users to examine the copyright status of the image because the source is incomplete. Please consider clarifying the exact source so that the copyright status may be checked more easily. It is best to specify the exact web page where you found the image, rather than only giving the source domain or the URL of the image file itself. Please update the image description with a URL that will be more helpful to other users in determining the copyright status.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source in a complete manner. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following [ this link]. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page or me at my talkpage. Thank you. MECU ≈ talk 15:37, 5 June 2007 (UTC)

Simple Wiktionary
Thanks for your past work on SE Wikt. I've set a goal of 2,000 words by the end of the month and I'm hoping you'll help us reach it.--BrettR 17:10, 4 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Hi Flcelloguy! Cromwellt here.  I don't know if the Signpost mentions article milestones for sisterprojects, but if it does, please mention that Simple English Wiktionary reached 2,000 articles on 4 Aug 7.  We'd love it if you became active over there again!  --Cromwellt|talk|contribs 06:49, 6 August 2007 (UTC)

Oversight
Hello. I am posting this message on your talk page, as you are identified as an individual with oversight permission on the English Wikipedia. On July 7, I sent a request for oversight to the appropriate email address. On July 8, that request was partially completed. Unfortunately, since that time, my (several) requests for follow-up have gone without reply. On July 18, I posted a message to the talk page for Oversight, which has not yet received a response. If you could please take a look at that message, and if you could please assist me with the remainder of the original request, I would greatly appreciate it. Thank you! j   talk   20:52, 20 July 2007 (UTC)

We miss you
I hope you start editing again soon. Raul654 17:49, 27 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Ditto. And even if something is preventing you from editing right now, I hope you will at least check in and assure us that everything is all right (which, of course, we hope it is). Newyorkbrad 02:28, 29 July 2007 (UTC)


 * Same here. Ral315 » 01:19, 21 September 2007 (UTC)

User:Garry Denke
You may not get this in time, but I noticed that you nominated this user's userpage for deletion in January. Further problems have now arisen and I'd very much appreciate your input at Administrators'_noticeboard/Incidents. Thanks. --Cherry blossom tree 11:35, 6 August 2007 (UTC)

Millipore
Hello, on 5 March 2006 you deleted Millipore Corporation in a move to Millipore Corp. It was subsequently deleted as a copyvio. Consequently somebody then hijacked the Millipore disambig page instead. This is one of the largest companies in the world, a long-standing S&P 500 company. As part of the Wikipedia missing articles project, I intend to rewrite the article with refs as a stub, as Millipore Corporation, and to restore the disambig page.Steven Russell 18:38, 30 August 2007 (UTC)

Help if possible?
Hi mate,

I am a Sysop on the Arrsepedia - a military themed Wiki. We have no in-built edit count or administrative ability. Can we use your tool on our Wiki? I have tried emailing you to no avail at your Hotmail address so please feel free to email me at 'arrsefaq@btinternet.com'. Cheers! 81.152.170.116 (talk) 15:12, 19 December 2007 (UTC)

ArbCom
Please see this WP:AE discussion regarding an ArbCom in which you sat on the committee: WP:AE. Please be reassured that I will answer and all questions, to clarify the question brought up of my character in the matter, something which I insist on in coming to proper closure of the matter. Charles 08:46, 28 December 2007 (UTC)

Robert Lawson (architect)
Robert Lawson (architect) has been nominated for a featured article review. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. Please leave your comments and help us to return the article to featured quality. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, articles are moved onto the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Remove" the article from featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. Reviewers' concerns are here. SilkTork  *SilkyTalk 09:27, 1 January 2008 (UTC)

Missing image Image:Arowanacele4.jpg
Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Image:Arowanacele4.jpg, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Image:Arowanacele4.jpg is an image page for a missing or corrupt image or an empty image description page for a Commons-hosted image. To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Image:Arowanacele4.jpg, please affix the template to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that '''this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. To see the user who deleted the page, click here''' CSDWarnBot (talk) 03:31, 2 January 2008 (UTC)

Possibly unfree Image:Gavel.jpg
An image that you uploaded or altered, Image:Gavel.jpg, has been listed at Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the image description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Sdrtirs (talk) 03:42, 12 April 2008 (UTC) --Sdrtirs (talk) 03:42, 12 April 2008 (UTC)

Image wanted
Hi. I noticed you commented on this engine image. You may like to comment on the planned new image here Cuddlyable3 (talk) 12:14, 16 July 2008 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:FSYO.gif
Thanks for uploading Image:FSYO.gif. You've indicated that the image is being used under a claim of fair use, but you have not provided an adequate explanation for why it meets Wikipedia's requirements for such images. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check


 * That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for each article the image is used in.
 * That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. --FairuseBot (talk) 04:51, 11 September 2008 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Orlando Sentinel.gif)
Thanks for uploading Image:Orlando Sentinel.gif. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:41, 1 October 2008 (UTC)

Image:NikitaKhrushchev.jpg listed for deletion
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:NikitaKhrushchev.jpg, has been listed at Images and media for deletion. Please see the to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Damiens .rf 14:53, 3 November 2008 (UTC)

Articles for deletion nomination of Saint-Saëns Cello Concerto
I have nominated Saint-Saëns Cello Concerto, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Articles for deletion/Saint-Saëns Cello Concerto. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. JackofOz (talk) 01:50, 19 July 2009 (UTC)

hallo from Uwe Kils
can you please vote again on http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Uwe_Kils_(3rd_nomination). Best wishes Uwe Kils 13:39, 9 December 2009 (UTC)

Unreferenced BLPs
Hello Flcelloguy! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 2 of the articles that you created  are  Unreferenced Biographies of Living Persons. Please note that all biographies of living persons must be sourced. If you were to add reliable, secondary sources to these articles, it would greatly help us with the current Category:All_unreferenced_BLPs article backlog. Once the articles are adequately referenced, please remove the unreferencedBLP tag. Here is the list:

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 20:19, 2 January 2010 (UTC)
 * 1) John Weisbrod -
 * 2) Terence Sellers -

Ping
I have sent you an e-mail. --Tenmei (talk) 07:29, 13 January 2010 (UTC)

EditCountBot
Hello! I recently created a village pump proposal and request for bot approval for a bot that automatically updates editcounts for use in userboxes, templates and such. We are currently discussing the benefits and drawbacks of such a bot, as well as various different ways in which it could be implemented. Since you are a member of WikiProject edit counter I thought you may be interested in participating, your input at the discussions would be very welcome. - EdoDodo talk 07:59, 13 May 2010 (UTC)

Wikipedia's tagline
Hi. I noticed that you participated in a 2005/2006 discussion and straw poll on whether or not the tagline at the top of all Wikipedia articles should be changed from "From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia" to "From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia that anyone can edit". I don't know if you're still interested in this issue or not, but this exact change has been proposed once again, this time at the Village pump, and there is currently an RFC (Request for Comment) on the subject where it is being discussed. All Hallow&#39;s Wraith (talk) 18:09, 13 May 2010 (UTC)

Permission to use the photograph Pumpjack
Hello, I have emailed you regarding permission to use the photo from Wikipedia, Pumpjack.Mojca graunar (talk) 13:22, 4 June 2010 (UTC)

Suspension of admin privileges due to inactivity
Following a community discussion in June 2011, consensus was reached to provisionally suspend the administrative privileges of users who have been inactive for one year, meaning administrators who have made neither any edits nor any logged actions in over one year. As a result of this discussion, your administrative privileges have been removed pending your return. If you wish to have these privileges reinstated, please post to the Bureaucrats' noticeboard and the userright will be restored per the re-sysopping process (i.e., as long as the attending bureaucrats are reasonably satisfied that your account has not been compromised and that your inactivity did not have the effect of evading scrutiny of any actions which might have led to sanctions). This removal of access is procedural only, and not intended to reflect negatively upon you in any way. We wish you the best in future endeavors, and thank you for your past administrative efforts. RL0919 (talk) 21:24, 9 July 2011 (UTC)

Non-free rationale for File:SnowFallingOnCedars.jpg
Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:SnowFallingOnCedars.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Kelly hi! 14:33, 30 July 2011 (UTC)

Non-free rationale for File:Stony Brook Arts Festival.jpg
Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Stony Brook Arts Festival.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Kelly hi! 14:38, 30 July 2011 (UTC)

Non-free rationale for File:Tzu Chi.jpg
Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Tzu Chi.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Kelly hi! 17:20, 30 July 2011 (UTC)

File:David Paulison.jpg listed for deletion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:David Paulison.jpg, has been listed at Files for deletion. Please see the to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Kelly hi! 17:22, 30 July 2011 (UTC)

Non-free rationale for File:WSHS Logo.JPG
Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:WSHS Logo.JPG. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Kelly hi! 17:23, 30 July 2011 (UTC)

The Olive Branch: A Dispute Resolution Newsletter (Issue #1)
Welcome to the first edition of The Olive Branch. This will be a place to semi-regularly update editors active in dispute resolution (DR) about some of the most important issues, advances, and challenges in the area. You were delivered this update because you are active in DR, but if you would prefer not to receive any future mailing, just add your name to this page. In this issue: Read the entire first edition of The Olive Branch -->
 * Background: A brief overview of the DR ecosystem.
 * Research: The most recent DR data
 * Survey results: Highlights from Steven Zhang's April 2012 survey
 * Activity analysis: Where DR happened, broken down by the top DR forums
 * DR Noticeboard comparison: How the newest DR forum has progressed between May and August
 * Discussion update: Checking up on the Wikiquette Assistance close debate
 * Proposal: It's time to close the Geopolitical, ethnic, and religious conflicts noticeboard. Agree or disagree?

--The Olive Branch 19:03, 4 September 2012 (UTC)

Notice of change
Hello. You are receiving this message because of a recent change to the administrator policy that alters what you were told at the time of your desysopping. The effect of the change is that you will not longer be able to request restoration of the tools because of your prior inactivity. You have until December 30, 2012 to request restoration or else the policy will prevent you from doing so in the future; you would need to seek a new WP:RFA. Until December 30, you can file a request at WP:BN for review by the crats. Thank you.  MBisanz  talk 04:22, 3 December 2012 (UTC)

(delivered by mabdul 23:21, 3 December 2012 (UTC))

Hi
 Do you have an interest in Gerald Ford?

Then maybe you might have an interest in joining WikiProject Gerald Ford! We're a group of editors working to improve Wikipedia's coverage of the life, career, and presidency of Gerald Ford.

We're very much a new project, so you have the opportunity to help form the design and structure of the WikiProject itself in addition to creating and improving content about Ford. You are more than welcome to join us by adding your username under the "Participants" section of our WikiProject page. Everyone is welcome, and you are free to contribute where and when you like.

If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to ask a member, and we'll be happy to help you. Hopefully we'll see you around the WikiProject!
 * You received this invitation in view of your significant contributions to the Gerald Ford article. -- Uzma Gamal (talk) 09:15, 10 January 2013 (UTC)

File:New user log.JPG missing description details
Dear uploader: The media file you uploaded as: is missing a description and/or other details on its image description page. If possible, please add this information. This will help other editors make better use of the image, and it will be more informative to readers.
 * File:New user log.JPG

If you have any questions, please see Help:Image page. Thank you. Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 15:51, 9 June 2013 (UTC)

Notification of automated file description generation
Your upload of File:Bob Carr PAC.jpg or contribution to its description is noted, and thanks (even if belatedly) for your contribution. In order to help make better use of the media, an attempt has been made by an automated process to identify and add certain information to the media's description page.

This notification is placed on your talk page because a bot has identified you either as the uploader of the file, or as a contributor to its metadata. It would be appreciated if you could carefully review the information the bot added. To opt out of these notifications, please follow the instructions here. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 13:52, 14 February 2014 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Afd delete
Template:Afd delete has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page.  Eye snore  (pc) 02:25, 20 April 2014 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Tzu Chi.jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:Tzu Chi.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 16:35, 12 April 2015 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Tower Bridge London Feb 2006.jpg


A tag has been placed on File:Tower Bridge London Feb 2006.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F2 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an image page for a missing or corrupt image or an empty image description page for a Commons-hosted image.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 08:11, 3 June 2015 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Tzu Chi.jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:Tzu Chi.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 10:09, 6 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:01, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

MfD nomination of User:Jimbo Wales/WikiProject Wikipedians who frankly don't care about Jimbo's beard
User:Jimbo Wales/WikiProject Wikipedians who frankly don't care about Jimbo's beard, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Jimbo Wales/WikiProject Wikipedians who frankly don't care about Jimbo's beard and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes ( ~ ). You are free to edit the content of User:Jimbo Wales/WikiProject Wikipedians who frankly don't care about Jimbo's beard during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Liz Read! Talk! 13:37, 6 March 2016 (UTC)

Your inactive bot(s)
Hello Flcelloguy. We currently show that you are the operator on file for at least one  account that appears to be inactive. Please see the discussion and list of bots here: Bot owners' noticeboard. If you are no longer operating your bot, no action is required - your bot will be marked as retired and have the bot flag removed. Should your bot be retired and you wish to revive it in the future, please request bot authorization at WP:BRFA. If you are still in control of your bot (including knowing its hopefully strong password) and wish to maintain the bot flag, please sign the table on the linked discussion. Thank you, — xaosflux  Talk 14:41, 26 November 2016 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Godotcomoriginallogo.JPG
Thanks for uploading File:Godotcomoriginallogo.JPG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:06, 3 October 2017 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Godotcomsecondlogo.JPG
Thanks for uploading File:Godotcomsecondlogo.JPG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:07, 3 October 2017 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Godotcom.JPG
Thanks for uploading File:Godotcom.JPG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:07, 3 October 2017 (UTC)

The Free Encyclopedia listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect The Free Encyclopedia. Since you had some involvement with the The Free Encyclopedia redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. f eminist 10:07, 20 October 2017 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Winter Springs High School (logo).JPG
Thanks for uploading File:Winter Springs High School (logo).JPG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:46, 22 April 2019 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Winter Springs High School (logo).JPG
Thanks for uploading File:Winter Springs High School (logo).JPG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. ★ Bigr   Tex  19:28, 17 June 2019 (UTC)

File:Atlantis Docked to Mir.jpg listed for discussion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Atlantis Docked to Mir.jpg, has been listed at Files for discussion. Please see the to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Soumya-8974 talk contribs subpages 05:58, 8 July 2020 (UTC)