User talk:Fleadom

Speedy deletion of Bydgoszcz(Poland)
A tag has been placed on Bydgoszcz(Poland) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, "See also" section, book reference, category tag, template tag, interwiki link, rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Triwbe (talk) 08:28, 13 April 2008 (UTC)

Bydgoszcz(Poland)
The above article, which you have created (and which I have deleted) several times is quite unnecessary. It is highly unlikely that anyone would search for Bydgoszcz(Poland), so a redirect is just wasting server space. The most likely search is the name of the article, Bydgoszcz. Just to be on the safe side, I created Bydgoszcz (Poland) (note the space) as a redirect after the second time you created the article in question; surely that will suffice? The creation of the article aside, your other edits have been very odd, if not disruptive. For instance, each time you've created the article, you just made a link to the article, instead of creating a proper redirect. When this was corrected by another editor, you reverted it against common logic and with no explanation. Also, your edits to Kremenchuk were quite perplexing; you took several words which were properly hyperlinked and made them resemble the article you created, which had the effect of making the links useless, as they led nowhere. I'm assuming your edits have been in good faith, and therefore am offering my assistance to you. Feel free to drop me a line on my talk page with any questions you may have. Cheers, faithless   (speak)  10:36, 16 April 2008 (UTC)