User talk:Flegrain

Welcome
Hello, Flegrain, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions.

I notice that one of the first articles you edited appears to be dealing with a topic with which you may have a conflict of interest. In other words, you may find it difficult to write about that topic in a neutral and objective way, because you are, work for, or represent, the subject of that article. Your recent contributions may have already been reverted for this very reason.

To reduce the chances of deletion, you might like to draft your article before submission, then ask me or any other editor to proofread it. To start creating a draft article, just click your user name at the top of the screen when you are logged in, and edit that page as you would any other. If the page you created has already been deleted from Wikipedia, but you want to save the content from it to use for that draft, don't hesitate to ask anyone from this list and they will copy it to your user page.

The one firm rule we do have in connection with conflicts of interest is that accounts used by more than one person will unfortunately be blocked from editing. It is also worth noting that Wikipedia generally does not allow editors to have usernames which specifically link them to one company or corporation. If your username does have such a name, it would be advisable for you to request a change of username.

If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! You can also just type   on your user page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Gurt Posh (talk) 17:49, 22 August 2011 (UTC)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Manual of Style

Nomination of National Atheist Party for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article National Atheist Party is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/National Atheist Party until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Gurt Posh (talk) 11:25, 23 August 2011 (UTC)

August 2011
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page National Atheist Party has been reverted. Your edit here to National Atheist Party was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline. The external link(s) you added or changed (https://www.facebook.com/National.Atheist.Party/) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 14:17, 23 August 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of National atheist party


A tag has been placed on National atheist party, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate,. Under the specified criteria, where an article has substantially identical content to that of an article deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Gurt Posh (talk) 15:54, 12 September 2011 (UTC)

Wikipedia is not here to promote your noble cause. Subjects here have articles because they already are notable enough to be written about in an encyclopedia, not because maybe if you wish real hard and try your best, they might be notable someday. -- Orange Mike  &#x007C;   Talk  18:32, 21 September 2011 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. -- Orange Mike  &#x007C;   Talk  18:32, 21 September 2011 (UTC)


 * Subjects here have articles because they already are notable enough to be written about in an encyclopedia, not because they are "here to stay" and maybe if you wish real hard and try your best, they might be notable someday. -- Orange Mike  &#x007C;   Talk  20:19, 22 September 2011 (UTC)


 * I already gave a reason above: "Since the first page was deleted, the user page said that no article was found and that I could enter a new article. I was not aware that I could still file a request at WP:DRV and thought I had to re-enter.". I was unaware of that the procedure was still available and thought I had to re-enter one. I want to do an honest contribution and need my account unblocked. Once the account is unlocked, I will asked that the deletion process be reversed and add more external source (included in the second entry) and a copy of the 527 status. I also need to know what additional criteria for "respectability" need to be included to not be a "maybe if you wish real hard and try your best". Can I get an answer please ? Decline reason is that I understand why I was blocked and I will not repeat the behavior that caused my blocking but will make useful contributions instead — Preceding unsigned comment added by Flegrain (talk • contribs)

For future reference, to request an unblock, you should use unblock, not unblock reviewed, as the latter indicates that an administrator has already looked at your request. I've fixed these last two unblock templates. --Philosopher Let us reason together. 12:36, 28 October 2011 (UTC)
 * I'm not answering this one, since I just re-deleted the article (another user created it) as G4. --Philosopher Let us reason together. 12:38, 28 October 2011 (UTC)