User talk:Fletchersparadox

Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure!

 * Hi Fletchersparadox! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission.  I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.
 * The Wikipedia Adventure Start Page
 * The Wikipedia Adventure Lounge
 * The Teahouse new editor help space
 * Wikipedia Help pages

-- 04:16, Saturday, December 16, 2017 (UTC)

Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure!

 * Hi Fletchersparadox! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission.  I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.
 * The Wikipedia Adventure Start Page
 * The Wikipedia Adventure Lounge
 * The Teahouse new editor help space
 * Wikipedia Help pages

-- 04:36, Saturday, December 16, 2017 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: New Mexico State Road 75 has been accepted
 New Mexico State Road 75, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created. The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article. You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. . Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia! Eddie891 Talk Work 00:55, 19 December 2017 (UTC)
 * If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the  [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_talk/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=New_Mexico_State_Road_75 help desk] .
 * If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider.

Misplaced page
The page you just created, Fletchersparadox/sandbox/projects/roads/NM75 has been moved to User:Fletchersparadox/sandbox/projects/roads/NM75 as I don't believe you meant for it to be in the mainspace. Home Lander (talk) 04:31, 21 December 2017 (UTC)

J. Craig Venter Institute
I am letting you know that I pretty much gutted the above article. I hate doing this sort of thing but it the article contained a lot of content that wasn't relevant to the title of the article. The content was interesting but most of it comes from primary sources, i.e., sources created by the topic itself. An organization cannot cite itself. Since this such a drastic set of edits, I wanted to let you know and possibly turn the article into something more timely and better referenced. Best Regards, Barbara (WVS) ✐ ✉ and Merry Christmas 15:03, 21 December 2017 (UTC)

Thanks for the note. Fletchersparadox (talk) 15:20, 21 December 2017 (UTC)