User talk:Fleuvesaintlaurent

Your submission at Articles for creation
 Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.
 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia&.
 * To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the [ reviewer's talk page] . Please remember to link to the submission!
 * You can also get live chat help from experienced editors.
 * Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Geek4gurl (talk) 16:01, 6 April 2013 (UTC)

Comment
Thanks for commenting and giving feedback. In regards to language, I don't quite understand what you were trying to say? Is the line of cisgender woman and the ideal woman sloppy? I was going back and forth how to paraphrase the source. Burnberrytree (talk) 00:47, 17 April 2013 (UTC)

Comment
In due respect, I just found that the language in the first paragraph especially seemed a titch informal.If you believe that it is justified, however, go ahead with it. I am no expert in this matter.

User: Fleuvesaintlaurent 01:40 (UTC)

Jan Olsson
Hi: You were the second reviewer to decline Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Jan Olsson. (It would have to become Jan Olsson (academic) or something like that and I have checked, it doesn't exist on Swedish Wikipedia.) The creator was on IRC getting himself all worked up over the decline and I did wonder whether you had considered the academic-specific notability guidelines, WP:PROF? He seems to meet criteria #6 and #8 and possibly sources could be found substantiating #1, which appears to be what the creator had mainly in mind as justifying an article. Yngvadottir (talk) 17:15, 17 April 2013 (UTC)

Nomination of Nemanja Kustrimovic for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Nemanja Kustrimovic is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Nemanja Kustrimovic until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Yngvadottir (talk) 18:27, 18 April 2013 (UTC)

Hi again: I've examined the sources for this article, and cannot see how they meet our verifiability standard. Also he does not appear to meet the specific notability standards for footballers. As I said to the IP editor who submitted this at AfC, I would love to be proven wrong, but I'm wondering whether you are aware of the specific standards for various kinds of article, as with the Jan Olsson case above, which falls under WP:PROF. General notability trumps those, but they exist to offer alternatives in specific kinds of cases, and in the case of this footballer, very little indeed was offered by way of sources. Yngvadottir (talk) 18:27, 18 April 2013 (UTC)


 * Regarding the above, I'd like to point you towards step 2 of the "When to decline a submission" section at WP:AfC. Thanks, C 679 21:50, 19 April 2013 (UTC)

Enmeshment
Jacobisq (talk) 09:35, 19 April 2013 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation
 Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.
 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia&.
 * To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the [ reviewer's talk page] . Please remember to link to the submission!
 * You can also get live chat help from experienced editors.
 * Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Michaelzeng7 (talk) 00:09, 21 April 2013 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation
 Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit if you feel they have been resolved.
 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia&.
 * To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the [ Articles for creation help desk], or on the [ . Please remember to link to the submission!
 * You can also get live chat help from experienced editors.
 * Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! みんな空の下 (トーク) 01:54, 30 July 2013 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/SunnyBrook School (Toronto) concern
Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/SunnyBrook School (Toronto), a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 02:04, 30 January 2014 (UTC)

Your draft article, Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/SunnyBrook School (Toronto)


Hello Fleuvesaintlaurent. It has been over six months since you last edited your WP:AFC draft article submission, entitled "SunnyBrook School (Toronto)".

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply and remove the  or  code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code:, paste it in the edit box at this link , click "Save page", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. HasteurBot (talk) 04:01, 1 March 2014 (UTC)