User talk:Flignats

February 2009
Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia. Wikipedia is not a collection of links, nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include (but are not limited to) links to personal web sites, links to web sites with which you are affiliated, and links that attract visitors to a web site or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam guideline for further explanations. Since Wikipedia uses the nofollow attribute value, its external links are disregarded by some search engines, including Google. If you feel the link should be added to the article, please discuss it on the article's talk page rather than re-adding it. ''Please do not add spam links to pages. Thanks!'' sherpajohn (talk) 04:04, 16 February 2009 (UTC)
 * [[Image:Stop_hand nuvola.svg|left|30px]] This is your last warning. The next time you insert advertising or a spam link,  you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Persistent spammers may have their websites blacklisted from Wikipedia.  — Erik  (talk • contrib) 15:17, 16 February 2009 (UTC)

Have you had a chance to read Wikipedia:Linkspam? A link to one website has been solicited across numerous film articles, so this is obviously an interest in increasing traffic to the website. Links must be evaluated on their own merits; for example, one should not use the same critic through film articles' critical receptions; some critics' reviews may be more detailed than others. Hope you get what I mean. — Erik (talk • contrib) 17:39, 16 February 2009 (UTC)

You have been from editing in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for continuing to add spam links. Persistent spammers will have their websites blacklisted from Wikipedia and potentially penalized by search engines. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text below. Daniel Case (talk) 16:11, 17 February 2009 (UTC)

Blocked again
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for. If you believe this block is unjustified you may contest this block by adding the text below. --Jayron32. talk . contribs 06:10, 19 February 2009 (UTC)

Jauerbackdude?/dude. 19:07, 19 February 2009 (UTC)}}


 * Flignats, if you would read and assimilate the information I posted above, you would understand that, as user-submitted reviews, they do not meet our inclusion requirements. — Travis talk  19:18, 19 February 2009 (UTC)

You have now had the problem thoroughly explained to you; there will not be a need for further unblock requests. -FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 21:58, 19 February 2009 (UTC)