User talk:Flipkin

Welcome
Hello there Flipkin, welcome to the 'pedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. If you need pointers on how we title pages visit Naming conventions or how to format them visit our manual of style. If you have any other questions about the project then check out Help or add a question to the Village pump. Cheers! &mdash; Frecklefoot | Talk 18:43, 13 September 2005 (UTC)

MobyGames
Hi, Flipkin. I've noticed you've been going about adding MobyGames links to several video games articles. Thanks for doing this! A lot of them need the link. I thought you might be interested in using the template for MobyGames entries:



to use, fill in the two fields. For example, for Pinball Construction Set:



renders this:

Of course, you're not required to use it, but I thought you might find it useful. Take care! &mdash; Frecklefoot | Talk 18:43, 13 September 2005 (UTC)


 * Hi, Frecklefoot. I am still learning the system so I am not sure if I should reply here or on your Talk page.  The template is great.  There are some nuances it does not cover.  For instance All-Star Baseball entry is for the series of games and not just one.  In which case the link:


 * http://www.mobygames.com/game_group/sheet/gameGroupId,571/


 * would be more appropriate. Also I imagine on occasion one may wish to link to the platform specific page instead of the combined page.


 * Example


 * http://www.mobygames.com/game/intellivision/bump-n-jump


 * vs


 * http://www.mobygames.com/game/bump-n-jump


 * Best
 * --Flipkin 14:14, 14 September 2005 (UTC)

I'm glad you're using it in some of the changes you make. However the template will work for the examples you cite. Remember, just enter everything after "game" in the URL. Both your examples URL's have "game" in them and you can put any text in the "game title" field. So, for the link:


 * http://www.mobygames.com/game/intellivision/bump-n-jump

you'd do this:



which would render this:



You can do the same with similar URL's, such as the series one you cite. However, while I can see cases where you'd want to link to series, I can't think of a case where you'd want to link to just one version of a game. But if there is some extraordinary circustance, the template will handle it. HTH  &mdash; Frecklefoot | Talk 20:03, 14 September 2005 (UTC)

Kingdom Hearts
Rationale accepted. I concede. ' (Feeling chatty? ) (Edits!) 23:02, 7 March 2006 (UTC)

Random Mobygames comment
I was doing some preliminery research for writing up an article on KISS: Psycho Circus. I'm almost certain that Mobygames has the release date incorrect, MobyGames states the US release was mid July, whereas every other online site gives the release some time early August. I think the August date is backed up by the fact that a private release party was held on July 31, 2000 as evidenced by this old link. Do you have any backup for your July claim? - Hahnch e  n 16:50, 10 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Actually, scratch that. Further research shows the date as 17/7/00. - Hahnch  e  n 17:15, 10 April 2006 (UTC)

Riviera: The Promised Land links
I would like to discuss the links to overall gaming sites in the article for Riviera: The Promised Land. I should probably start by explaining exactly why I think they shouldn't be there. These websites are fairly popular, and if people want information from them it wouldn't be difficult to just search for it on those sites. The MobyGames link doesn't even have any information that the other sites linked to in that article didn't, so it just seems like it would be wasting space to have so many links there. Yggdra Juril Altwaltz 03:22, 14 September 2006 (UTC)

Conflict of interest warning
David, you have established yourself  as David Berk, a co-founder of the MobyGames website. As such WP:COI prohibits you from adding any further links to MobyGames (and the 900 links you have already added may get automatically cleaned up) or editing articles about MobyGames, or getting involved in deletion discussions about MobyGames articles or templates. This is a warning to make you you understand these rules. If you break them this account may be blocked without further warning. --BozMo talk 10:31, 8 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Looks like somebody doesn't like mobygames. Don't you just love it when they all band together and just oust whatever they don't like? BTW they want to delete all traces of mobygames links. They conveniently omitted that part. Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Spam216.37.86.10 14:06, 12 June 2007 (UTC)
 * This kind of comment qualifies as "trolling" by the way. FWIW personally I don't mind MobyGames at all: not that I am technically a "they" I suppose, as I am not a "Spam member" (don't ask). I think setting up this project was a cool thing to do and its been done quite well technically. In some circumstances I would even be one of those actively linking to it. But its the conduct of some of MobyGames supporters/employees/owners I have a real problem with: linkspam campaigns by SPAs, dishonesty in characterising "community decisions", aggressive responses and the like. Numbers of links added by individual users on Wikipedia get tracked automatically, as do COI link additions once they are picked up and abuse of most wider community rules is asking for trouble as well as unacceptable. One way or another this behaviour cannot be allowed to pay. --BozMo talk 15:13, 12 June 2007 (UTC)
 * "" "" "" "" 216.37.86.10 16:26, 13 June 2007 (UTC)

On WP:COI/N, I think we can reach a consensus not to mass-delete the MobyGames links if you agree to abide by WP:COI compliance in the future. (See also WP:SCOIC.) Please comment here or there. THF 15:31, 21 August 2007 (UTC)

Fair use disputed for Image:Columbia GSB.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Columbia GSB.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 02:33, 6 September 2007 (UTC)

David E. Scott
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article David E. Scott, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you agree with the deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add  to the top of David E. Scott.  Gtstricky Talk or C 20:26, 15 January 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Berk's Law


A tag has been placed on Berk's Law requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about something invented/coined/discovered by the article's creator or someone they know personally, and it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. TheLongTone (talk) 20:14, 26 March 2014 (UTC)

Deletion discussion about Loungart
Hello, Flipkin, and welcome to Wikipedia. I edit here too, under the username Simon Peter Hughes, and I thank you for your contributions.

I wanted to let you know, however, that I've started a discussion about whether an article that you created, Loungart, should be deleted, as I am not sure that it is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia in its current form. Your comments are welcome at Articles for deletion/Loungart.

You might like to note that such discussions usually run for seven days and are not ballot-polls. And, our guide about effectively contributing to such discussions is worth a read. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with. And, don't forget to sign your reply with. Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Simon Peter Hughes (talk) 00:39, 4 November 2021 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Loungart


Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Loungart requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. – Lord Bolingbroke (talk) 04:55, 4 November 2021 (UTC)