User talk:Fllrfth

ran across an article that were proposed for deletion, there was something about the wording of the concerns/reviews via an specific user or Admin that was disturbing, although strategically worded, the words seemed to embody an crass, an ugly, an personal hate, so I started researching the concerns as well as the subject via wiki and outlets, joined wiki to give my 2 cents, gave my 2 cents (while professionally addressing the wording) and were accused of something call a puppet!, by that user/Admin no doubt, but not too concerned, I am however concerned with the underlined ugly, personal hate of those reviews. Rather the page warrants being published or not, wiki is not and should never be an platform to exercise one's personal ugly nor personal hate, however strategic or officially worded. Needing to know if there's an entity within the wiki organization to address it or should I seek help from an outside source. Fllrfth (talk) 00:59, 22 February 2017 (UTC)


 * I see no evidece of hate, crass, ugly and personal or otherwise. I didn't see you address the wording either. Unfortunately a brand new account joining a deletion discussion on a rather obscure, new article for their first edit, "sockpuppetry" (that the new account is an alternative account created by another user to give the impression of more widespread support) is a common suspicion. If you are not the author of the article you commented on, you can ignore the investigation.
 * If you have evidence of user misconduct you can bring it up at WP:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents. If you choose to do so you will need to support accusations of misconduct with evidence, preferably in the form of diffs, and you will need to notify the editor(s) whose conduct you bring up at AN/I of the discussion. Huon (talk) 02:37, 22 February 2017 (UTC)


 * Huon, Thank you for responding, your time and the information, it's understandable how strategically worded crass, ugly, hate etc... statements can be confusing, i.e. a strategically worded crass, insulting etc... statement, "I hear you're a bad dog in your community," some will see it as crass, insulting etc..., some will think it's an badge of honor. As to "professionally addressing the wording," I professionally addressed at least one of those statements (the awards are minor in nature) by stating "not minor in nature," and listing numerous Wikipedia notable artist whom either won or were nominated for the awards and themselves listed the awards as significant. If words like "seems," "appears," etc... were in the statement, then the statement would not have appeared as a "personal ugly or personal hate," as well would not have been as disrespectful, offensive and insulting to several demographics, regions and notable outlets that have proven the significance of the awards, and that's not a politically correct assessment but simply because this is Wikipedia words should matter. Again Thank you, and will utilize the information for follow up. Fllrfth (talk) 18:09, 23 February 2017 (UTC)