User talk:FloK

Image copyright problem with Image:Blank line in "hidden" template.JPG
Thank you for uploading Image:Blank line in "hidden" template.JPG. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 20:56, 4 February 2008 (UTC)

Klaus Mehnert
Hi! You have reverted the bibliography section I had added and replaced it with your own version, which is not much more comprehensive than the previous. Would you please explain what was the reason. Thanks. CeeGee (talk) 19:12, 31 March 2008 (UTC)

RE: Windows Live Mail
Hi FloK. I do agree with you that an article should include both pros and cons on a subject matter. However, Wikipedia is not a place for people to document a list of bugs in a software, unless it has significant coverage which justifies it's notability in the article. For notability to exist, this usually requires reliable secondary sources. The reason I reverted your edit is because (1) forums and newsgroups are not considered reliable secondary sources, and (2) the issue does not have enough significant coverage for it to be considered notable. --Damaster98 (talk) 13:17, 19 March 2011 (UTC)

Stranger, Bear Word to the Spartans We…
I saw your contribution to this page and wanted to say thank you for your help and efforts. -Ich (talk) 21:11, 17 September 2012 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:01, 23 November 2015 (UTC)