User talk:FloNight/Archive May 2007

USRD Newsletter - Issue 6

 * Want to help on next month's newsletter? Don't want to receive these in future? Don't want it subst'd next time? – It's all here. —Rschen7754bot 22:03, 21 April 2007 (UTC)

The WikiProject Biography Newsletter: Issue II - April 2007
The April 2007 issue of the WikiProject Biography newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you BetacommandBot 18:42, 24 April 2007 (UTC)

Problem with your revert
I really object your revert as that revert obviously puts the vandalism and crystal-ball content back in. She did a lot of damage to the Time Crisis 4 article that myself and other Wikipedians had to alleviate the damage done by that untrusted anon.

Reverting it back to the last edit by 165.21.83.230 is much like giving vandals a free-ride and I know what this anon did was cruft, so please think twice before reverting.

If you continue to revert back to the fact that people can see cruft in talk pages, I will have to report your unprofessional behavior. &mdash; Vesther (U * T/R * CTD) 00:47, 26 April 2007 (UTC)

Thank you, thank you
I appreciate your fixing my TalkPage, my friend. --Rednblu 02:37, 29 April 2007 (UTC)

ChrisGriswold Arbitration case
Hi FloNight, back from wikibreak.... you OK?? I am! As regards ArbCom cases, the ChrisGriswold one looks interesting (I've been following the Betacommand one.... it's been interesting so far!)

I have a sockpuppet (or an alternate account) too, like Chris, except it's a non-abusive one, and only edits in my userspace and sandbox - my alternate account is. I assume the use of it for editing my userspace only is complaint with WP:SOCK??

Anyhow, I'm working on some plant-related articles now - what articles you working on??

It's good to be back from wikibreak! Thanks, --SunStar Net talk 18:07, 30 April 2007 (UTC)

ChrisG
Flo, you might want to post a request to RFP to desysop Chris, and link to his request. He is still an admin, and although I posted to his talk that he needs to ask at meta, he's on a break and I don't know if he will see the note. Thatcher131 12:04, 1 May 2007 (UTC)

Talk:David Boothroyd
FYI, I have reported your edit on this article's talk page to Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents. You have twice failed to offer any explaination (9 & 16 April) via the following message on your talk page. leaky_caldron 18:58, 2 May 2007 (UTC)

Regarding the article Talk:David Boothroyd and the associated deletion log deletion log, I was wondering if you would be able to explain why 38 revisions have been deleted? This was clearly a considerable history and directly relevant to the associated article. It's continued absence will make it difficult for prospective editors to apply changes to the main article without the benefit of the history/discussion/debate/argument contained within the talk page. Surely a more conservative culling could have been made, if necessary?

As advised by SqueakBox is this a matter for you the editor or Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents leaky_caldron 11:19, 16 April 2007 (UTC)

Science Collaboration of the month
NCurse work 21:08, 2 May 2007 (UTC)