User talk:Floinik

Chinese architecture
Please don't add random images for use on the article. The main images needed to be clear (the tower one is far away, dark and unclear, the Dajing pavilion is taken from an odd angle that shows a lot of blank wall), focus on the subject (again the bell tower image is too far away and the picture is not focused on the building), significant and/or representative (neither of those two are important buildings). See MOS:IMAGES. Hzh (talk) 18:53, 3 August 2019 (UTC)

The image provided are clear, I can also argue that the images that you provided are random too. The images that you provided however are foggy and uncommon Chinese architecture style. Importance and relevance is a matter of your personal opinion, just because they are not publicised doesn't make them less important.