User talk:Flokkaw

Welcome
Welcome!

Hello, Flokkaw, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place  before the question. Again, welcome! FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 16:31, 9 October 2010 (UTC)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Tutorial
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
 * Manual of Style

Question
This seems odd- it appears that your account exists solely to undo the contributions of User:Catfish Jim and the soapdish. Can you shed a little light on your contributions? You're presenting the appearance of someone who isn't new to Wikipedia, and who is pursuing some sort of grudge... but maybe I've misunderstood. -FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 16:35, 9 October 2010 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for inappropriate use of multiple accounts as User:WIKKART. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 16:42, 9 October 2010 (UTC)

I still don't understand what you're trying to do, but you don't need two accounts to do it- and it might be better if you clarified what you're doing before you continue editing. I'd like to know whether you've used another account at Wikipedia, and if so, what its name was. I'd also like to understand the reason for your edits. -FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 16:44, 9 October 2010 (UTC)
 * There's more:
 * All of which I will block as well (though presumably they would be autoblocked already). I've reverted only one of their edits; some other people have reverted others, and other edits are still not reverted and I'm not comfortable taking a position on their validity. I only chose to revert a particularly obviously wrong change.  —  Soap  —  16:46, 9 October 2010 (UTC)
 * All of which I will block as well (though presumably they would be autoblocked already). I've reverted only one of their edits; some other people have reverted others, and other edits are still not reverted and I'm not comfortable taking a position on their validity. I only chose to revert a particularly obviously wrong change.  —  Soap  —  16:46, 9 October 2010 (UTC)
 * All of which I will block as well (though presumably they would be autoblocked already). I've reverted only one of their edits; some other people have reverted others, and other edits are still not reverted and I'm not comfortable taking a position on their validity. I only chose to revert a particularly obviously wrong change.  —  Soap  —  16:46, 9 October 2010 (UTC)
 * All of which I will block as well (though presumably they would be autoblocked already). I've reverted only one of their edits; some other people have reverted others, and other edits are still not reverted and I'm not comfortable taking a position on their validity. I only chose to revert a particularly obviously wrong change.  —  Soap  —  16:46, 9 October 2010 (UTC)


 * have also been doing the same thing. I don't quite know what argument can be made for the validity of these users' edits, but I'll look into the whole situation properly when I've got a few hours of unfettered internet access. Catfish Jim and the soapdish (talk) 19:27, 9 October 2010 (UTC)
 * have also been doing the same thing. I don't quite know what argument can be made for the validity of these users' edits, but I'll look into the whole situation properly when I've got a few hours of unfettered internet access. Catfish Jim and the soapdish (talk) 19:27, 9 October 2010 (UTC)
 * have also been doing the same thing. I don't quite know what argument can be made for the validity of these users' edits, but I'll look into the whole situation properly when I've got a few hours of unfettered internet access. Catfish Jim and the soapdish (talk) 19:27, 9 October 2010 (UTC)
 * have also been doing the same thing. I don't quite know what argument can be made for the validity of these users' edits, but I'll look into the whole situation properly when I've got a few hours of unfettered internet access. Catfish Jim and the soapdish (talk) 19:27, 9 October 2010 (UTC)

Sockpuppetry case
Your name has been mentioned in connection with a sockpuppetry case. Please refer to Sockpuppet investigations/Erfurt150 for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to cases before editing the evidence page. Catfish Jim and the soapdish (talk) 18:59, 16 October 2010 (UTC)