User talk:Floopy Wiener

July 2015
Hello, I'm Dspradau. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Jury— because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks.  Dspradau   → talk   20:12, 24 July 2015 (UTC)

Please refrain from making nonconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Jury with this edit. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you.  Dspradau   → talk   20:17, 24 July 2015 (UTC)

Please do not add unsourced or original content. Doing so violates Wikipedia's verifiability policy. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia.  Dspradau   → talk   20:21, 24 July 2015 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Jury. Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: Jury was changed by Floopy Wiener (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.931996 on 2015-07-24T20:23:45+00:00. Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 20:23, 24 July 2015 (UTC)

Your account has been blocked indefinitely because it is being used only for vandalism. Furthermore, your username is a blatant violation of our username policy, meaning that it is profane; threatens, attacks or impersonates another person; or suggests that your intention is not to contribute to the encyclopedia (see our blocking and username policies for more information). We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia, but users are not allowed to edit with inappropriate usernames and we do not tolerate 'bad faith' editing such as trolling or other disruptive behavior. If you think there are good reasons why these don't describe your account, or why you should be unblocked, you are welcome to appeal this block – read our guide to appealing blocks to understand more about unblock requests, and then add the text at the end of your user talk page. Jackmcbarn (talk) 20:33, 24 July 2015 (UTC)

 Your ability to edit this talk page has been revoked as an administrator has identified your talk page edits as inappropriate and/or disruptive. ([ block log] • [ active blocks] • [ global blocks] • [//tools.wmflabs.org/xtools/autoblock/?user=&project=en.wikipedia.org autoblocks] • contribs • deleted contribs • [ abuse filter log] • [ • change block settings • [ unblock] • [ checkuser] ([ log]))

If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System. If you have already appealed to the Unblock Ticket Request System and been declined you may appeal to the Arbitration Committee's Ban Appeals Subcommittee. Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the post of this notice. Jackmcbarn (talk) 02:39, 25 July 2015 (UTC)