User talk:Flopuenbeam

October 2022
Hello, I'm Dudhhr. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to User talk:Floquenbeam—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. dudhhr talk contribs (he/they) 14:42, 7 October 2022 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Flopuenbeam


Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, introducing inappropriate pages, such as User:Flopuenbeam, is considered vandalism and is prohibited. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Under section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, the page has been nominated for deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. dudhhr talk contribs (he/they) 14:43, 7 October 2022 (UTC)

October 2022
Your account has been blocked indefinitely because it appears to impersonate another Wikipedia user. Users are not allowed to edit with inappropriate usernames, nor is other disruptive behavior ever allowed. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text  below this notice. For best results, please read the guide to appealing blocks first. DanCherek (talk) 14:59, 7 October 2022 (UTC)