User talk:Floridainvestor87

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! Information about how to post here can be found at WP:WELCOME.

I need to ask you to stop deleting information from the article John Ducas (investor). You nominated the article for speedy deletion, which I declined because it is not eligible. It was earlier proposed for deletion, which was declined. It cannot be speedied or prodded a second time; the only way to delete it is via the Articles for deletion process. In the meantime, you should not be removing information which supports notability, and then claiming that he is not notable. If you want to talk about it, we can discuss it here or on the article's talk page. --MelanieN (talk) 23:13, 24 November 2014 (UTC)

It is obvious that you were bribed by the subject of this page to maintain his promotional presence on Wikipedia. Please tell me why a 16-year old child who received 3,000 euros from his parents to invest in some stocks is notable enough to have a Wikipedia page, especially when it is poorly sourced and does not contain anything of importance to the world. Should every single child who happens to like investing be featured on Wikipedia? Do you really believe that the articles on Business Insider and Forbes are real and weren't paid for by his family to the editors of those websites? Do you really genuinely believe that this child has a financial firm with 150 clients when he is a High School student and simply has a small blog about finance? http://www.ducascapitalmanagement.com/disclaimer/ Stop this nonsense. You are hurting the world by allowing those with money to promote themselves on Wikipedia when they have done nothing notable. This is social injustice at its best. --Floridainvestor87
 * You have no evidence that anyone has been bribed or paid to do anything. I would suggest you stop tossing around serious charges like that and stop casting aspersions on other editors.  Any issues with the article should be discussed on its talk page. 331dot (talk) 23:26, 24 November 2014 (UTC)

Since you have filed a complaint at the Administrator's Noticeboard, I have replied there. But I will add: what is obvious is that YOU came here to Wikipedia purely for the purpose of destroying this one article. I won't speculate about why you are doing this. --MelanieN (talk) 23:28, 24 November 2014 (UTC)

Not sure why you think that was appropriate
But unfounded casual slander like that is not going to fly, and I'll block you from editing if you keep it up.

You appear to be looking for our process for discussing whether an article should be deleted or not. If you click on that link and read it, and still have any questions, I would imagine someone would be willing to help explain in more detail. Probably even Melanie. Just ask here, and put a helpme template on your page. But not if you're going to continue to act like a jerk. --Floquenbeam (talk) 23:34, 24 November 2014 (UTC)


 * Hello Floquenbeam, it was not my intention to act "like a jerk" as you have put it. I am simply unfamiliar with the formal processes of Wikipedia. I would like to see evidence of John Ducas's notability for having a Wikipedia page. As a professional in the finance industry myself, it is shocking to see a 16-year old child with a promotional article about his fake financial firm which is actually simply a blog with random articles. Please have a look at the website for yourself, if you still think that it is notable enough to the world to have a Wikipedia page of its own, then I will rest my case. http://www.ducascapitalmanagement.com/disclaimer/


 * I appreciate your help and I would love to hear about the deletion process in more detail. I strongly maintain that this page should be deleted, and I would be glad if one of you could help me with this process, as Wikipedia is a platform for education not for promotion.


 * --Floridainvestor87 (talk) 23:41, 24 November 2014 (UTC)


 * Regarding acting like a jerk: that has nothing to do with Wikipedia policies, it's part of interacting in a reasonable way with your fellow humans. I understand you embezzled money from your company, and then invested it following this person's advice, so you have a conflict of interest and can't edit the article. What's that you say?  I have no proof whatsoever of that accusation?  It's outrageous?  Well I still stand by it, because I have no proof that it isn't true.  See how ridiculous (and immoral) that tactic is?


 * Regarding removing the article: I linked to the process above: WP:Articles for deletion. You can start a discussion about whether the article should be deleted or not, others will review and provide their opinion, and then an admin will come along and make a determination.  Admins can't just do this kind of thing unilaterally.  To save wasting time, you should first consider whether this person meets our policy on inclusion (or not) of articles; "notability" has a particular meaning on Wikipedia that isn't exactly the same as eslewhere.  If you're convince this article doesn't meet that requirement, then start a deletion discussion. --Floquenbeam (talk) 23:49, 24 November 2014 (UTC)

Please follow our policies
Others have warned you, let me add my warnings: JoeSperrazza (talk) 15:20, 26 November 2014 (UTC)
 * 1) Don't delete things from articles with incomplete explanations for doing so, and don't delete without justification in policy. See your edit here: . Further such edits will likely lead to sanctions - at the very least a ban against editing or discussing this topic.
 * 2) Don't attack other editors. Accusations of "bribery" without proof are personal attacks. You've done so repeatedly. Further statements of this nature will undoubtable lead to this account being blocked. BTW, your statement that the author you accuse was the only one to edit the article is provably false.