User talk:Florin Nitu

LD Assistant - Lighting Design and Visualization Software
A tag has been placed on LD Assistant - Lighting Design and Visualization Software, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article seems to be blatant advertising which only promotes a company, product, group or service and which would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. If you can indicate why LD Assistant - Lighting Design and Visualization Software is really not blatant advertising, I advise you to edit the article promptly, and also put a note on Talk:LD Assistant - Lighting Design and Visualization Software. An admin should check for such edits before deleting the article. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Please read our criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 11 under General criteria. You might also want to read the guidelines on spam. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. To contest the tagging and request that admins should wait a while for you to assert why the article is not blatant advertising, please affix the template  to the page, and then immediately add such an assertion. It is also a very good idea to add citations from reliable sources to ensure that your article will be verifiable. Tonywalton | Talk 13:20, 8 December 2006 (UTC)

Please stop removing speedy deletion notices from articles that you have created yourself. If you do not believe the article deserves to be deleted, then please do the following: Administrators will look at your reasoning before deciding what to do with the article. Thank you. Tonywalton | Talk 14:00, 8 December 2006 (UTC)
 * 1) place   on the page. Please do not remove any existing speedy deletion notice(s)
 * 2) make your case on the article's .

Please stop removing speedy deletion notices from articles that you have created yourself. If you continue to remove them, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Tonywalton | Talk 14:02, 8 December 2006 (UTC)

LD Assistant
Thanks for the rewrite and toning down the statements that looked like pure advertising (I forget the exact wording, but I'm talking about unsupported statements like "...is the New Generation of..." - as I say, I may have the wording not quite right there but it was somewhere in the first couple of sentences). The main thng about articles on here is that they must conform to the policies listed here. So articles must be written from a neutral point of view (so something saying or implying that a product or service is absolutely wonderful must either not say that or must present an opposing viewpoint) and claims made must meet the criterion of verifiability. "This is the best product for cleaning your carpet" is unacceptable, "According to such-and-such published survey this is the best product etc" is acceptable. Sources must be given (at least on talkpages or edit summaries, if not in the article) and must also count as reliable; a survey that says "My MD and the Board of Directors all say this is the best product" is not a reliable source. There's also a set of guidelines on notability. Take a look at WP:SOFTWARE for specific details on articles on software products. Again, thanks for taking the time to re-write this. Tonywalton | Talk 15:58, 8 December 2006 (UTC)