User talk:Flower of truth

Welcome!
  Hello, Flower of truth!  Welcome to Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

  Getting Started

Tutorial Learn everything you need to know to get started. Introduction to contributing • Editing

• Referencing

• Images

• Tables

• Policies and guidelines

• Talk pages

• Navigating

• Manual of Style

The Teahouse Ask questions and get help from experienced editors.

The Task Center Learn what Wikipedians do and discover how to help.

Tips 
 * Don't be afraid to edit! Just find something that can be improved and make it better. Other editors will help fix any mistakes you make.
 * It's normal to feel a little overwhelmed, but don't worry if you don't understand everything at first—it's fine to edit using common sense.
 * If an edit you make is reverted, you can discuss the issue at the article's talk page. Sign your messages with four tildes ( ~ ), be civil, and don't restore the edit unless there is consensus.
 * When adding new content to an article, always include a citation to a reliable source.
 * If you wish to edit about a subject with which you are affiliated, read our conflict of interest guide and disclose your connection.
 * Have fun! Your presence in the Wikipedia community is welcome.

Happy editing! Cheers, Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 10:54, 23 June 2022 (UTC)


 * Thank you sop much! Flower of truth (talk) 10:27, 16 January 2023 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Flower of truth


A tag has been placed on User:Flower of truth, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the. Zefr (talk) 21:09, 25 January 2024 (UTC)


 * Strictly a vanity article, WP:NOTCV, with a spam name. Zefr (talk) 21:11, 25 January 2024 (UTC)
 * @Zefr: Kindly note that your request for deletion has been reverted by an administrator. Please consider removing or striking out your comments above as they are potential PA. Thanks. -- Dustfreeworld (talk) 12:12, 26 January 2024 (UTC)
 * Thank you! Flower of truth (talk) 12:53, 26 January 2024 (UTC)
 * @Dustfreeworld Thank you! Flower of truth (talk) 12:54, 26 January 2024 (UTC)

ANI discussion
Please be aware of Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents. --Tryptofish (talk) 00:30, 28 January 2024 (UTC)

Personal talk page cleanup
Hi Flower of truth, just to make sure you know that users may freely remove (and/or archive) comments from their own talk pages.

Inappropriate content may be removed from any page in your user space, including your user talk page.

Please see this page for help on how to archive. See here for an example of talk page that always has all content removed (without archiving I suppose; people can still get the removed content from the page’s history though). I occasionally archive comments on my talk page (sometime just one comment, sometimes more), though I won’t do it often. Best, -- Dustfreeworld (talk) 04:54, 28 January 2024 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

 * Thank you! @Dustfreeworld Flower of truth (talk) 21:12, 6 March 2024 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:The European Chemistry and Biotechnology Journal (EUCHEMBIOJ)


A tag has been placed on Draft:The European Chemistry and Biotechnology Journal (EUCHEMBIOJ), requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the. Randykitty (talk) 21:06, 6 March 2024 (UTC)


 * The deletion criterion simply says 'This applies to pages that are exclusively promotional and would need to be fundamentally rewritten to serve as encyclopedia articles, rather than advertisements. If a subject is notable and the content could plausibly be replaced with text written from a neutral point of view, this is preferable to deletion. Note: Any article that describes its subject from a neutral point of view does not qualify for this criterion. However, "promotion" does not necessarily mean commercial promotion: anything can be promoted, including a person, a non-commercial organization, a point of view, etc.' and you think and decided that the the article on The European Chemistry and Biotechnology Journal (EUCHEMBIOJ), falls into this category, while other articles about other journals not so they can be included. Please be more spefific about your reasoning as simply citing the criterion does not clarify your reasoning. @Randykitty Flower of truth (talk) 08:36, 7 March 2024 (UTC)

License tagging for File:EUCHEMBIOJ.png
Thanks for uploading File:EUCHEMBIOJ.png. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 22:31, 6 March 2024 (UTC)