User talk:Flowerriver/C’s LGBTQ+ Chosen families and communication, LGBTQ+ Family Communication and Immigration, and LGBTQ+ Poetic Inquiry

K's Peer Review for F
Hey F!

This looks so interesting. I loved reading about poetic inquiry and its relation to LGBTQ+. I think this is fantastic I do not really have any pointers or suggestions for change. Great job!! Kaemyth (talk) 04:45, 16 April 2024 (UTC)

Dr. E's Review
C, really good job citing sources here throughout your writing (although they need cleaning up like noted in the bibliography sandbox). You will need to unpack theoretical jargon and shift to a Wiki writing style. See the Women’s Studies page rather than “this article,” and paper writing style. OsaRosa (talk) 09:08, 16 April 2024 (UTC)

peer review response
Hi Dr E, I'll definitely work on cleaning up my sources and fix my writing style, thank you so much for the feedback!(Flowerriver (talk) 04:47, 17 April 2024 (UTC))

peer review response 2
Hey K! I agree poetic inquiry is a really interesting topic and I'm excited to continue learning more about it, thanks for your feedback! (Flowerriver (talk) 04:48, 17 April 2024 (UTC))

LGBTQ+ Poetic Inquiry feedback
Hi @Flowerriver, Rather than focusing on what the author said or wrote, try to change the writing style to reflect the main ideas that are being discussed. What are the main takeways/ideas that need to be shared with readers on Wikipedia.

Also I suggest checking out pg. 8 of this PDF, for examples of encyclopedic writing. I think it might be helpful to look at and apply the style to your draft content. Brianda (Wiki Ed) (talk) 23:21, 19 April 2024 (UTC)