User talk:Flowers362

Notability of Matt Felker
A tag has been placed on Matt Felker requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article appears to be about a real person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable. If this is the first page that you have created, then you should read the guide to writing your first article.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. DAJF (talk) 12:24, 26 June 2008 (UTC)

Notability of Matthew felker
A tag has been placed on Matthew felker requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article appears to be about a real person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable. If this is the first page that you have created, then you should read the guide to writing your first article.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Mvjs (talk) 11:10, 3 July 2008 (UTC)

Gossip sites and BLP
Please do not re-add the "Personal" section to Selma Blair. It is sourced entirely to gossip sites and tabloids that do not meet our definitions of a reliable source, and including it is a violation of our policy on biographies of living people. Phil Sandifer (talk) 17:25, 9 July 2008 (UTC)


 * Do not reinsert this information or you will be blocked. Thank you. Phil Sandifer (talk) 18:01, 9 July 2008 (UTC)


 * None of those citations are to People. Furthermore, I cannot help but notice that your edits have consisted of adding this information and editing an article on Matthew Felker. If you will forgive my suspicion, I am concerned that you may be somewhat close to the subject you're editing on. Please note that this is a conflict of interest. I ask again that you back off of this matter - if there are more reliable sources than the ones the section is using, feel free to bring them up on the article's talk page. But if you edit the article directly to re-add this information again, I will block you. Phil Sandifer (talk) 18:13, 9 July 2008 (UTC)


 * You have been blocked for 24 hours. When you return, please follow the advice above or you will be reblocked. Phil Sandifer (talk) 18:17, 9 July 2008 (UTC)