User talk:Flowersk2411/sandbox

Baumgartner Feedback: Direct Instruction
You have some information here. Only put original material in the sandbox- it cannot be a copy/paste of the original article because it can become difficult to tell what is original and what is novel. I would encourage you to add a section specifically on early childhood education. When you make a change on the article page, make sure that you catalog the change on the accompanying talk page that explains how and why.Jj baumgartner (talk)Jj baumgartner —Preceding undated comment added 22:50, 22 October 2018 (UTC)

Lsimmons Feedback: Direct Instruction
For the overall article, I think that you have done a good job adding to the article in order to expand it with the purpose of further explaining and clarifying. I also agree with Ellyn, that while I like the examples, it is a little hard to tell exactly what they are doing. To improve try providing a scenario as that might be beneficial to help with further explaining. For the grading scale I would also say a (4) is appropriate. You did meet the expectation of adding more and clarifying. What you added definitely helps the article, but there is still room to add more and adjust some.

Laura SimmonsLauraKSimmons (talk) 16:00, 19 October 2018 (UTC)

Eculotta Feedback: Direct Instruction
I enjoy the way you began with what direct instruction is and the purpose it serves. I am rather confused as to whether or not direct instruction is supposed to be capitalized or lower case. The edited summary portion of your article provides clarity to readers. I would like to add a comment on the examples you provided for direct instruction. As a reader, I would like for this section to be a little clearer. Is the example for direct instruction “drawing children’s attention to the task” or is it “look up here. I have something to tell you. Etc.”

On the grading scale provided, I would say that this article revision would receive a (4) “meets expectations.” You did a great job, yet there are a couple of things to still consider during your writing and editing process.

Eculotta (talk) 00:09, 19 October 2018 (UTC)Eculotta