User talk:Flu1234

As was explained several times at User_talk:99.240.108.221, your continued insertion of uncited essay sections of 2007–2008 world food price crisis falls under WP:NPOV. If you continue to insert the same uncited opinion piece into the article it will be removed and treated as vandalism. PLEASE please please read the Wikipedia policies on Article standards. If you are confused by this, please let me know.

See especially No original research, which read, in part: "Wikipedia does not publish original research or original thought. This includes unpublished facts, arguments, speculation, and ideas; and any unpublished analysis or synthesis of published material that serves to advance a position. This means that Wikipedia is not the place to publish your own opinions or experiences. Citing sources and avoiding original research are inextricably linked: to demonstrate that you are not presenting original research, you must cite reliable sources that provide information directly related to the topic of the article, and that directly support the information as it is presented."

The content you are trying to insert is directly contrary to these principles, and has been reverted, with explanation a number of times. If you don't understand this, please let me know.

Otherwise, we have to assume you do understand these rules and are inserting this content despite this. If this continues it will be treated as vandalism which will be referred to administrators who may take action up to and including the blocking of your account. T L Miles (talk) 15:25, 5 May 2008 (UTC)

I'm assuming that since you inserted this again, you have no interest in discussing this. Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. T L Miles (talk) 18:53, 5 May 2008 (UTC)

Look, this is not big and it's not clever. Please note that this content will never survive on wikipedia (even if I ignore it) as it DIRECTLY violates the most basic article inclusion policies. Refusing to discuss or note this doesn't do your case much good either.

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appeared to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. T L Miles (talk) 00:39, 6 May 2008 (UTC)

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue dispute resolution. - BanyanTree 03:54, 6 May 2008 (UTC)

May 2008
Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to 2007–2008 world food price crisis. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. CanadianLinuxUser (talk) 13:27, 6 May 2008 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing Wikipedia  as a result of your . You are free to make constructive edits after the block has expired, but please note that vandalism (including page blanking or addition of random text), spam, deliberate misinformation, privacy violations, personal attacks; and repeated, blatant violations of our policies concerning neutral point of view and biographies of living persons will not be tolerated. - BanyanTree 21:43, 6 May 2008 (UTC)