User talk:Fluffy cats battalion

Welcome
G'day Fluffy cats battalion, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions; they have helped improve Wikipedia and made it more informative. I hope you enjoy using Wikipedia and decide to make additional contributions.

As a contributor to Australian articles, you may like to connect with other Australian Wikipedians through the Australian Wikipedians' notice board and take a look at the activities in WikiProject Australia and associated sub-projects. Wikimedia Australia your local chapter organises editor training workshops, meetups and other events. If you would like to know more, email [mailto:help@wikimedia.org.au?subject=Help+me+please!&body=Please+tell+us+your+Wikipedia+username+and+the+article+you+are+trying+to+change+and+what+the+problem+is help@wikimedia.org.au].

If you are living in Australia and want to subscribe to location-based notices, you can add location userboxes to your user page.

Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ~ ; this will automatically produce your name and the date.

If you have any questions, please see Where to ask a question, try the Help desk, or ask me on my talk page. Or you can just type   on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions.

Some other resources to help new Wikipedians include:


 * How to edit a page
 * Editing tutorial
 * Picture tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Article titles
 * Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Thank you for signing up! Kerry (talk) 02:19, 21 March 2024 (UTC)

Lede sections can repeat content elsewhere in the article
The lede section (before the first heading) is intended as short summary of important points. It is normal for in a lede to repeat information and citations found elsewhere in the article and is not a reason to delete such material. See MOS:LEAD for more details. Wikipedia has many policies and practices. As a new user, my advice to you is to focus on making positive additions to article content rather than deletions, unless there is a clear policy justication for deletion (vandalism, hate speech, uncited). Similarly a "minor edit" is not what you think it is judging by the way you are marking everything you do as minor. Minor means spelling corrections, formatting, and things that don't change the information content of the article. See WP:MINOR for more details. My advice is, if in any doubt about whether an edit is minor, don't mark it as minor. If I can be of any help, please don't hesitate to ask. Kerry (talk) 02:29, 21 March 2024 (UTC)


 * Thank you very much for this clarification. I will review the edit I made and make the necessary changes. Fluffy cats battalion (talk) 02:39, 21 March 2024 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of DIDWW Ireland


A tag has been placed on DIDWW Ireland requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, such as at Articles for deletion. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Guliolopez (talk) 17:10, 22 June 2024 (UTC)

Nomination of DIDWW Ireland for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article DIDWW Ireland is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/DIDWW Ireland until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished. Guliolopez (talk) 19:21, 22 June 2024 (UTC)

, I'm curious. Your account is relatively new and has made mostly minor edits to disparate biographical articles. Can I ask what prompted you to write a new article about a really obscure telecoms company, that almost exactly duplicated a deleted article? Bastun Ėġáḍβáś₮ŭŃ! 11:53, 23 June 2024 (UTC)