User talk:Fluidforming Americas

Your submission at Articles for creation: Fluidforming (January 15)
 Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Fluidforming Articles for creation help desk] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by Robert McClenon was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was: This draft reads like an advertisement, but Wikipedia is not for advertising.

This draft is written from the viewpoint of the company, focusing on what the company says about itself. Corporate notability is based on what independent reliable sources have written about the company.

Robert McClenon (talk) 17:47, 15 January 2019 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Fluidforming


A tag has been placed on Draft:Fluidforming, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the. Robert McClenon (talk) 17:48, 15 January 2019 (UTC)

There have been two problems with this account: the account has been used for advertising or promotion, which is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia, and your username indicates that the account represents a business or other organisation or group or a web site, which is also against policy, as an account must be for just one person. Because of those problems, the account has been blocked indefinitely from editing.

If you intend to make useful contributions about some topic other than your business or organisation, you may request an unblock. To do so, post the text at the bottom of your talk page. Replace the text "Your proposed new username" with a new username you are willing to use. See Special:CentralAuth to search for available usernames. Your new username will need to meet our username policy. Replace the text "Your reason here" with your reason to be unblocked. In that reason, you must:
 * Convince us that you understand the reason for your block and that you will not repeat the kind of edits for which you were blocked.
 * Describe in general terms the contributions that you intend to make if you are unblocked.

If you believe this block was made in error, you may appeal this block by adding the text at the bottom of your talk page, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.  ceran  thor 17:52, 15 January 2019 (UTC)

Someone else will review your request. If you patented your technology, why do you want to now distribute it to the world? That, by the way, is a promotional purpose. As an encyclopedia, Wikipedia is only interested in what independent reliable sources state about article subjects. In order for you to be successful, you would need to forget everything you know about this technology and only write based on what independent sources state. While it is possible, most people cannot do that. 331dot (talk) 18:26, 15 January 2019 (UTC)


 * You are completely misunderstanding what this page is. The distribution of this technology is irrelevant, hence why there was no mention of it within the content. The reason why we wanted to create this page was so the patented technology is discoverable for users within the market, providing a more convenient, efficient and environmentally friendly option for metal forming. Also, our goal is to make the general public aware of this new patented technology which proactively avoids any occurrence of illegal replication, therefore alleviating the frustration of court and trial. We are more than happy to have a third party create the page, but it needs to be on record that we are blatantly stating this was NOT meant for promotional purposes for future use of our Wikipedia account. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Fluidforming Americas (talk • contribs)
 * This appears to be an effort to use Wikipedia to advertise. Using corporate or organizational resources to advertise via Wikipedia is an ineffective and sub-optimal use of those resources.  A better way to advertise a business or non-profit organization is to spend the resources on improving your own web site.

Robert McClenon (talk) 19:35, 15 January 2019 (UTC)