User talk:FlyJet777

WikiProject India's Collaborations of the month invites you
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 11:10, 29 March 2021 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for July 23
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Kohima District, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Baptist College.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:54, 23 July 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Drugmulla has been accepted
 Drugmulla, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the  [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_talk/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Drugmulla help desk] . Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider.

Thanks again, and happy editing! Ant a nO 15:37, 23 July 2021 (UTC)

Wikiproject Ladakh
Hi FlyJet777 I am creating new articles on Ladakh mountain peaks and other geographical landmarks. Would you like to team up? RPSkokie (talk) 07:56, 31 October 2021 (UTC)

Please explain an edit
This one. The Template:Election box winning candidate with party link is meant to be used in election boxes for the winning candidate. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 10:07, 12 November 2021 (UTC)
 * Thanks for undoing these changes. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 03:04, 13 November 2021 (UTC)

The WikiEagle - January 2022
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:35, 1 January 2022 (UTC)

Add VietJet Air to Airlines and Destinations section of  Dhaka Airport
VietJet Air is launching Dhaka-Hanoi  flights in December  2022. Please add this in the airlines and destination section of Shahjalal International Airport Dhaka. Thanks. 37.111.214.55 (talk) 05:42, 26 October 2022 (UTC)

Please mention the date and source. Thanks! :) FlyJet777 (talk) 06:50, 26 October 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:33, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

Separating AOC and Subsidies
Hi im just here to leave you note that has been discussed and agreed that we do not separate airlines with different subsidies for example like Wizzair, Wizzair UK, Wizzair Malta, Wizzair Abu Dhabi or Eurowings and their subsidies except Eurowings Discover or Easyjet and their subsidies or British Airways and their subsidies, etc. The list goes on. All these subsidies have just different AOC but using the same website with the same rules. That's why we do not list it separately. As you stated your example Air India and Air India Express are two different brands indeed using different rules and different websites etc. in that case those are listed separately. Thank you for your understanding. Wishing you lovely day/evening. Wappy2008 (talk) 20:07, 14 February 2023 (UTC)


 * Thank you for this note. Please mention the discussion/archived discussion of the same here for better understanding. FlyJet777 (talk) 20:30, 14 February 2023 (UTC)
 * Here you find all 19 archives of Airport project: its good to scroll through all of it so your eyes catch several articles that might be very useful for your future edits. Wappy2008 (talk) 22:43, 14 February 2023 (UTC)

Please provide the particular discussion link. It's not feasible to look at each and every discussion starting from the year 2004. FlyJet777 (talk) 05:10, 15 February 2023 (UTC)


 * You will have to scroll through it as it has been a while ago and i don't know which archive it is but i will check if i find it will straight attach it to you Wappy2008 (talk) 19:22, 15 February 2023 (UTC)
 * It has been quite a while now since you wrote that. Therefore, I request you to attach the archived discussion at the earliest. You may mention some aviation users who may be aware of the discussion. Do it at the earliest. FlyJet777 (talk) 22:28, 28 February 2023 (UTC)
 * It's been almost a month and you still haven't responded even after my reminder. I now suggest to you that either you mention the archived discussion here or all of your edits will be reverted immediately citing vandalism to Wikipedia. As I had mentioned earlier, you may mention other aviation users to support your point. You have a day to respond. FlyJet777 (talk) 12:18, 10 March 2023 (UTC)
 * i suggest you go through the archive and properly check before you go against Wikipedia rules. as well would like to make aware that you don't accuse people of being vandal. this will be your second warning message and it's just because you are too lazy to scroll through the archive Wappy2008 (talk) 03:27, 12 March 2023 (UTC)
 * You are suggesting that it is other users responsibility to clear your point? If you are confident about your claim, then prove it. That is the sole reason I stopped editing the pages as I was expecting the discussion link. First you say there's been a discussion and consensus and then when I ask about it, you fail to provide it. Also, your reason of merging the subsidiaries because of them "having the same website" rather seems invalid because if it had been the case, then AirAsia's subsidiaries (Indonesia AirAsia, Thai AirAsia, etc.) would be shown as merged into AirAsia as the website is common. But, they are listed differently on Wikipedia.
 * Further, I had given you a month's time to respond with the archived discussion link. I had also allowed you to mention other aviation users who were part of the said discussion. Did you respond? No. I had also given you a reminder but you still didn't respond. You are unable to prove your point and it is you who is engaged in an edit war. FlyJet777 (talk) 05:42, 12 March 2023 (UTC)
 * As i would mention before if you have so much concern about the topic and as clearly you do and are only one. This was done for a years now where we didn't separate AOC and subsidies which were agreed before. why would you separate subsidies when you go to the airport What is written is just AirArabia not subsidies. separating them is just useless and if you are not happy about creating a related topic and discussion on the Airport project page would be useful for you. I didnt reply because for some reason i didn't receive notification about your reply no because id dint want to or tried to avoid it Wappy2008 (talk) 13:19, 12 March 2023 (UTC)
 * Surely. Why wouldn't I be concerned? It is a serious issue we are discussing here. Subsidiaries have never been listed under the parent company on Wikipedia. For example: Alliance Air was Air India's subsidiary till January 2022. During those times, there websites were the same. But Alliance Air's routes were never mentioned under Air India. They were and are still listed differently.
 * "When you go to the airport what is written is just AirArabia not subsidiaries", what kind of statement is that? Example: AirAsia India flights (IATA: I5 ; ICAO: IAD) were and are never shown under the IATA code AK (which belongs to its parent company AirAsia), the flights are always listed as I5XXX. Thai AirAsia X, AirAsia X, Indonesia AirAsia, all are AirAsia's subsidiaries and have the same website but are always shown differently because they are different airlines - this is the key here: DIFFERENT AIRLINES which have different codes. Where is the logic in your statement?
 * And if there's already been a discussion (as you say) then why should I post a new discussion? All I am asking you is to provide the discussion link. I will be happy to be proven wrong, but atleast provide the link. And do you seriously think I am going to scroll through the archives from 2004 till present? Not happening. FlyJet777 (talk) 19:27, 13 March 2023 (UTC)
 * @Jan olieslagers @Reywas92 Need some help here. FlyJet777 (talk) 19:37, 13 March 2023 (UTC)
 * I am sorry but you are one who has concern here, therefore you should create discussion to get other involved so your problem is resolved (you shouldn't ask different users to get involved on your talk page neither, there is special discussion board on it) but as i mentioned before i have attached you archive to have a read and scroll through it so you avoid further conflicts like this but you refusing to do so. Airasia should be lined as Airasia only and no other distinguish involved as it is just a different country / AOC / subsidy but airlines remain the same company. AS well you have to understand that Wikipedia is not a Travel guide and in use is common name. and here we get again to another article from archive which if you wont be lazy to read you would understand what exactly i am writing and talking about here. As if you want to be good editor is not just about editing is about to read Wikipedia articles to go along with it. Wappy2008 (talk) 23:10, 13 March 2023 (UTC)
 * "Airasia should be lined as Airasia only" Do you understand that different airlines should always be listed differently otherwise it creates confusion? A flight which is being operated by I5 should not be under AK. It creates confusion as to which airline is actually operating the flight (I5 or AK). This is the reason they are listed differently. This has nothing to do with WP:COMMONNAME.
 * I also noticed that you mentioned of WP:AIRPORTS in your edit summary on Abu Dhabi International Airport. I read the entire Airlines and destinations section of that page thrice but could found no statement which justifies your edit on merging subsidiaries. I also read WP:AIRLINES but as usual, there was no mention of any rule that stated "subsidiary airlines should be merged".
 * I am happy to put up a new discussion on this topic. FlyJet777 (talk) 04:26, 14 March 2023 (UTC)
 * It looks to me that the only confusion is you are creating for yourself by not reading the archive. you are still mixing names with flight/IATA numbers. all flights are by AirASia. If you buy a flight with Airasia I5 and another connecting flight is AK. what you use as a common name i fly with AirAsia no matter what IATA each flight uses. Thats if you would read WP:COMMONNAME you would understand. as you mentioned flights operate by (I5 or AK) which is another topic in the archive that we do not list operated by (you would have known that if you would read archive). Wappy2008 (talk) 08:58, 14 March 2023 (UTC)
 * The matter is under discussion in WP:AIRPORTS. We shall further discuss this matter there. FlyJet777 (talk) 18:53, 15 March 2023 (UTC)
 * Note above mixing common names with IATA and ICAO which has nothing to do with how you state / style airline names on articles. Not to mention that you fully admitted above that you refuse to educate yourself on aviation articles in archives and cooperate with other users. Not a very good way of responding. I have read all 16 archives so im able to understand what is allowed and what is not. It's just for your own better so you don't get into conflicts like this. if you would spare that month of waiting and read it even before we wont have to go through this at all right now. Hope this makes it more understandable for you. Thank you and have a good day Wappy2008 (talk) 23:27, 13 March 2023 (UTC)
 * @Jetstreamer @Sunnya343 Want you both to have a look at this. FlyJet777 (talk) 05:47, 12 March 2023 (UTC)

Edit war regarding AOC and Subsidies
Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Wappy2008 (talk) 03:30, 12 March 2023 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Proposed airports in Odisha


A tag has been placed on Category:Proposed airports in Odisha indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz Read! Talk! 01:33, 9 April 2023 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Proposed infrastructure in Odisha


A tag has been placed on Category:Proposed infrastructure in Odisha indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz Read! Talk! 06:48, 16 April 2023 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 22
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2023 Telangana Legislative Assembly election, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Khanapur Assembly constituency.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:05, 22 August 2023 (UTC)

August 2023
When you make edits, please could you check them. We all make mistakes. This particularly applies when using templates, because they can have unobvious features. In this edit to the article on Prayagraj division you added a template call:. It does not exist. Please fix it. If you have been adding it in other places, please fix it there too. -- Toddy1 (talk) 20:41, 28 August 2023 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Prayagraj division geography stubs


A tag has been placed on Category:Prayagraj division geography stubs indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz Read! Talk! 01:15, 29 August 2023 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Prayagraj-geo-stub


A tag has been placed on Category:Prayagraj-geo-stub indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz Read! Talk! 01:15, 29 August 2023 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Male actors from Prayagraj


A tag has been placed on Category:Male actors from Prayagraj indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz Read! Talk! 16:06, 30 August 2023 (UTC)

Amitabh Bachchan - what city name to use
Started Talk:Amitabh_Bachchan for comments on this.  Ravensfire  (talk) 17:57, 30 August 2023 (UTC)

Manually moving categories
Could you please stop manually moving categories from "X in Allahabad" to "X in Prayagraj"? The proper process is to list them at WP:CFDS, citing WP:C2D, not copy-and-paste and haphazardly change articles around. Thanks. * Pppery * it has begun... 00:27, 1 September 2023 (UTC)
 * Also please don't cut-and-paste move templates - use the page move function instead. I've cleaned up after most of this already. * Pppery * it has begun... 01:12, 1 September 2023 (UTC)


 * Hello, FlyJet777,
 * Also, do not empty out categories so they are tagged for speedy deletion, this is called "emptying out of process". All of your edits doing this can be reverted. If you believe a category should be deleted, renamed or merged, propose it at Categories for Discussion.Thank you. Liz Read! Talk! 16:46, 1 September 2023 (UTC)

Article hijack + copypaste move
Hi, you seem to have taken over K. Annamalai, and turned it into a different person altogether. Please don't do that. If you want to write about someone by the same name, create a new article for them. (I have restored the article to its earlier content.)

As part of doing that, you appear to have also made a copypaste move to recreate the original article at K. Annamalai (AIADMK politician). Please don't do that, either. Copypaste/cutpaste moves lose the article's edit history, which must be retained for legal reasons.

Thank you. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 15:42, 25 September 2023 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of K. Annamalai (BJP politician)


A tag has been placed on K. Annamalai (BJP politician) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, at Articles for deletion/Annamalai k. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. iMahesh ( talk ) 03:24, 26 September 2023 (UTC)

CfD nomination at
A category or categories you have created have been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at  on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Qwerfjkl talk  09:34, 2 October 2023 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 10
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Rani Kamalapati (Habibganj)–Rewa Vande Bharat Express, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Rewa.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:03, 10 October 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:49, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for December 16
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 16th Madhya Pradesh Assembly, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Rajpur Assembly constituency, Banda Assembly constituency and Devsar Assembly constituency.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:03, 16 December 2023 (UTC)

Death/ disqualification of MLA
Hi @FlyJet777. Regarding your edit at 18th Uttar Pradesh Assembly, whenever there is a death/ disqualification or resignation by MLA, do not remove the name of outgoing MLA since they are historically a part of that assembly until their death disqualification or resignation. In that case, add a new line under that constituency and mark it as 'Vacant' like I have done here. Dhruv edits (talk) 07:30, 16 December 2023 (UTC)

T/p, please
I see no reason why we need to mention that the ASI produced a 839-page report, etc. Also see WP:NOTNEWS - we do not aim to give a blow-by-blow account. TrangaBellam (talk) 20:19, 31 January 2024 (UTC)

@TrangaBellam We need to mention about the report because it is a serious current issue pertaining to Gyanvapi. Important current events are always mentioned in Wikipedia, or they aren't? The content that I have added about the ASI survey is to expand the litigation section with respect to what is happening currently, of which the ASI report is a very significant part. Line-by-line details of the report have not been mentioned. Not mentioning the findings also undermines WP:NPOV, as in that case the article seems to describe the current issue from a the point of view of the Muslim-side. I have added the views of both Hindu and Muslim sides with regards to the report with proper citation. Further suggestions are welcome. Have a good day! FlyJet777 (talk) 20:36, 31 January 2024 (UTC)


 * I have the report and your summarization is horrible — entirely driven by the media-frenzy — missing out on far-intriguing aspects.
 * For example, you wrote about how the ASI report mentioned that the western wall of the mosque was part of the destroyed temple; did you spot that long before ASI arrived, our article, written almost in entirety by me, already said, [..] the southern wall — along with its cusped arches, exterior moldings and toranas — was turned into the qibla wall [..]? TrangaBellam (talk) 20:43, 31 January 2024 (UTC)
 * More than the number (32), what matters is that they appear to be votive inscriptions. These are the interesting bits from the persepctive of art history.
 * efforts were made to erase the symbols on the temple pillars - yes, that is the result of aniconic impulses of Islam; not something sinister as is made out to be. We see the same in Qutb Shah Complex and many other places across South and South East Asia. TrangaBellam (talk) 20:46, 31 January 2024 (UTC)
 * Long story short, as a cursory glance at our article impresses upon an average reader, no RS doubts that there did not exist the Vishveshwar at the place of the current mosque. (vide, there has been little engagement with these claims in historical scholarship; Desai interprets Nomani's arguments as a strategic "rewriting of history" arising out of the Hindu-hegemonic nature of discourse in postcolonial Benaras.) So, using the ASI report to drive home that point is very weird and misplaced. Their survey has far interesting bits which I will add in a day or two. TrangaBellam (talk) 20:48, 31 January 2024 (UTC)
 * Why mentioning the ASI report is weird? I have the report too and there have been several other findings as well that were not added to the article. Only those findings that hold significant importance were added. If your article mentions that the southern wall was turned into qibla, what's wrong in mentioning about the figurines of Shiva, Vishnu, etc that are there since there existed the now-demolished Adi Vishveshwar Temple? You may add that to provide more details to the article, not paragraphs about them, but one-liners. FlyJet777 (talk) 21:11, 31 January 2024 (UTC)
 * I didn't say that mentioning the ASI report is weird; rather that your use of the report — to highlight a point that is already well-made in existing scholarship (and the article) — is weird. It is not that I have not used the report — see the part about the mosque being built in the 20th regnal year of Aurangzeb, the chambered design, etc. So that said, if your sole point of contention is the recovery of figurines, I am willing to add a line about that. TrangaBellam (talk) 07:01, 1 February 2024 (UTC)
 * "I didn't say that mentioning the ASI report is weird; rather that your use of the report — "to highlight a point that is already well-made in existing scholarship". Okay so you are saying that since the point about the western walls was already made then we did not have to rewrite it citing the ASI report. Understandable.
 * Then you could have removed just that line about the western wall. There was no need to remove the other points (about the figurines, the reaction of AIMPLB and Varanasi district court allowing Hindus to worship). The "permission for worship" part is a significant turn for the mosque's present and future. And it was properly cited as well, and it was definitely not driven by "media-frenzy" as you say it. I added them to present them as a chain of events (again, as one-liners and not entire paras) w.r.t the current litigation. FlyJet777 (talk) 07:15, 1 February 2024 (UTC)
 * I fail to see why AIMPLB's reaction - on an ASI survey - is DUE given Desai's comments, which I had quoted above. Btw, did the ASI survey attempt a reconstruction of the original temple plan? I glanced through the report and did not find anything but that would have been interesting. TrangaBellam (talk) 19:48, 1 February 2024 (UTC)
 * not sinister? destroying idols and erasing symobols which are religiously and emotionaly important to others is ok beacuse its the relgion's impulse and should be accepted because its "common"? makes it non sinister? ok fine. for one moment we can accept that.but building a mosque over others worship place is also non sinister? you need a morality check. we understand you have a soft spot for islamic invaders but removing sourced information from different different pages whenever it dosent suit you own prespective or narrative has become your standard lately.fine do as you wish.justify whatever you can in your brain and then present information which makes you sleep better at night.selective biased editors. 2409:40E3:19:572B:10D5:6F36:ACF9:5FA0 (talk) 01:00, 1 February 2024 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 1
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Hooghly Lok Sabha constituency, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Hooghly.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:05, 1 March 2024 (UTC)

We can't add alliance with as you did at
We can't add alliance with as you did at 2019 Kerala and Tamil Nadu general election as per as লাল সেলাম কমরেড (talk) 23:02, 7 March 2024 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 22
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2024 elections in India, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Hamirpur Assembly constituency.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 18:07, 22 March 2024 (UTC)

April 2024
Your recent editing history at Coimbatore Lok Sabha constituency shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you do not violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Equine-man (talk) 18:45, 13 April 2024 (UTC)


 * How about first taking a look at the edits that I am reverting? The others are not even editors but spam ID addresses vandalising the article but instead of protecting the page which I have already requested for you are sending me a warning? How fair is that? FlyJet777 (talk) 18:50, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
 * The IP address was given the same warning. If there is no consensus on edits, then you report the editor at the relevant place. You do not continue edit warring. Two wrongs do not make a right. Equine-man (talk) 18:52, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
 * I have already reported the edit warrings made by those IP addresses. Removing entire candidate names and parties just because it does not match with their ideology, calling other candidates "sheep" is unacceptable on a site like Wikipedia and are bound to be reverted everytime or the page protection must be increased to prevent edit wars.
 * Furthermore, the edits made by IP addresses are not even constructive. Then how can there be a concensus? Are political parties in election boxes placed randomly or on basis of their past performence? I have already requested the admins to protect the page Coimbatore Lok Sabha constituency at the earliest. However, the response that I got is I should "stop bickering". Is this how we tackle vandalism by spam IP addresses on Wikipedia? FlyJet777 (talk) 18:58, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
 * If it is vandalism that is your main concern, report them to WP:AIV Equine-man (talk) 19:06, 13 April 2024 (UTC)

 You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for edit warring and violating the three-revert rule, as you did at Coimbatore Lok Sabha constituency. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page:. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 20:22, 13 April 2024 (UTC)


 * Blocked for fighting and reporting vandalism? Great. FlyJet777 (talk) 20:38, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
 * Just take a deep breath, accept your 24 hours and come back and concentrate on the topics you enjoy.
 * My advice: In future if you truly believe there is vandalism involved, add the appropriate warnings to the editor’s talk page. If you believe they are wrong, take it to the talk page of the article, you therefore are showing you understand Wikipedia’s processes. If the editor persists in carrying on with their edits, report them to admins. Equine-man (talk) 21:24, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
 * No, you were blocked for violating WP:3RR. As described in that policy, the rule is a and you were well over the line.
 * Also, your use of the term "vandalism" goes far beyond the definition used by Wikipedia. The edits in question were not vandalism, and they were certainly not as discussed in WP:3RRNO. In future disagreements over content, please discuss things on the talk page. Your lack of engagement with talk pages during this dispute, coupled with a noticeable absence of talk page edits in your recent activity, is concerning. Regards. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 21:32, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
 * Understood and apologies for the same. Also thank you for giving protection to the Coimbatore Lok Sabha constituency page. If possible, please consider giving protection to all the pages that are under the purview of 2024 Indian general election in Tamil Nadu (all Lok Sabha constituencies of Tamil Nadu and Puducherry) including the mentioned page. IP addresses are removing names of candidates and parties in all these pages. I reverted a lot of those edits but there is no guarantee that those or some different IP address won't make such edits again. Regards FlyJet777 (talk) 21:43, 13 April 2024 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Former members of Bharatiya Janata Party from Punjab


A tag has been placed on Category:Former members of Bharatiya Janata Party from Punjab indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz Read! Talk! 05:35, 25 May 2024 (UTC)

2024
@FlyJet777 Please make difference between CPI(M) and BAP in Rajasthan Lok Sabha 2024 map. XYZ 250706 (talk) 06:08, 6 June 2024 (UTC)