User talk:Flyingdutchman265

Vandalism
Stop or we block!--Edchilvers 19:32, 30 October 2006 (UTC)

You have recently re-created the article The f-ing man, which was deleted in accordance with Wikipedia's deletion policies. Please do not re-create the article. If you disagree with the article's deletion, you may ask for a deletion review. -FisherQueen 19:47, 30 October 2006 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to create inappropriate pages, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. -FisherQueen 20:02, 30 October 2006 (UTC)

how do i use the sandbox then i was trying to learn

that was the link i got on the sandbox page

Regarding your questions
One of the messages above has a link to Wikipedia's deletion policies, which will explain why some pages are deleted.

I did not delete your pages- I just put a tag on them saying that I thought they should be deleted under those policies. Only an administrator can delete pages.

If you think that your pages don't violate Wikipedia's policies after you've read them, you can message an administrator and explain why your pages should be returned. Remember to sign your post (just click "sign your name" below the editing space) so they'll know who left the message. -FisherQueen 22:34, 31 October 2006 (UTC)

Nonsense articles
Please stop creating your 'raddest dude in the universe' article. It doesn't belong in an encyclopedia. If you keep doing stuff like this, you'll be blocked for disruption. - C HAIRBOY (☎) 19:36, 26 November 2006 (UTC)

AfD nomination of POS parent over shoulder
I have nominated POS parent over shoulder, an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Articles for deletion/POS parent over shoulder. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Bit Lordy (talk) 15:26, 8 June 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Safest place in a tornado
A tag has been placed on Safest place in a tornado requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Rnb (talk) 15:24, 25 July 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Safest place in a tornado
A tag has been placed on Safest place in a tornado, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent. If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do. Feel free to leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions about this.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you.  TN ‑ X - Man  15:28, 25 July 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of James dellaguardia
A tag has been placed on James dellaguardia requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. benjicharlton (talk) 02:29, 12 September 2008 (UTC)