User talk:Fmarree

Hi Fmarree,


 * Thanks for you contributions on Biogas, most helpful. However, I do have one question and a small comment. what program did you use to create your Biogas image (File:Biogas_plant_sketch.jpg) ? Are you aware of Scalable vector graphics? -- it may be that the program that you created this image in supports this format, which if you save it as SVG allows for the size independent printing of images. If you could upload or convert this image, that would be most helpful. Alternately, if you are not familiar with the method, I can provide some assistance in performing the conversion
 * Secondly, just a quick comment about references. When referencing, please reference the exact document that supports the statement that you wish to make. referencing homepages of organisations makes keeping track of information, and where it was obtained from quite difficult. For some reading, if you are interested, you can look at the Citation guidelines or Verifiability of resources pages. Thanks User A1 (talk) 22:35, 20 December 2009 (UTC)

Hi User A1, Hopefully this message reaches you; I'm new to communciating on Wikipedia. Thanks for the comments! 1. The biogas image is professionally created in a programme not known to me, but I saved it with Paint as jpeg file and uploaded it here. I'm planning to adjust the image (high resolution) and incorporate our logo, than everybody can use the image and download it right away, without asking me for the high-resolution one. 2.Shall I change these references to external links than? Best regards!
 * Hi FMaree, I had your page on my watchlist, so I noticed your edit. Yes please do change the links to point to the exact document that supports your statement. Just remember, that verifiablity is critical, and the best sources of information are journals (there are open-access journals like PLos, which anyone can read ), as well as government institute data (technical reports, etc). These are highly verifiable. Other sources could include major news outlets (as there is some editorial oversight), but these tend to be better for specific facts, rather than technical information. Good luck. User A1 (talk) 15:07, 14 January 2010 (UTC)