User talk:Fmg2007

April 2015
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to DJ Smallz has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 20:22, 30 April 2015 (UTC)
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: DJ Smallz was changed by Fmg2007 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.892234 on 2015-04-30T20:22:15+00:00.

Please refrain from making nonconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Murphy Lee with this edit. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism. Thank you. Winner 42 Talk to me!  20:47, 30 April 2015 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Project Pat with this edit, you may be blocked from editing. IronGargoyle (talk) 20:54, 30 April 2015 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of "M.E. Da Great"
M.E. Da Great, a page you created, has been tagged for deletion, as it meets one or more of the criteria for speedy deletion; specifically, it is about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how they are important or significant, and thus why they should be included in an encyclopedia. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, and the guidelines for biographies in particular..

You are welcome to contribute content that complies with our content policies and any applicable inclusion guidelines. However, please do not simply re-create the page with the same content. You may also wish to read our introduction to editing and guide to writing your first article.

Thank you. Donner60 (talk) 22:19, 30 April 2015 (UTC)

April 2015
Please do not remove speedy deletion notices from pages you have created yourself, as you did with M.E. Da Great. If you believe the page should not be deleted, you may contest the deletion by clicking on the button that says: Contest this speedy deletion, which appears inside the speedy deletion notice. This will allow you to make your case on the article's talk page. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the article. Thank you. Joseph2302 (talk) 22:27, 30 April 2015 (UTC)

Please stop removing speedy deletion notices from pages that you have created yourself, as you did with M.E. Da Great. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Joseph2302 (talk) 22:36, 30 April 2015 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of LNM (Rapper)


A tag has been placed on LNM (Rapper) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a band or musician, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Gparyani (talk) 22:49, 30 April 2015 (UTC)

April 2015
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove a speedy deletion notice from a page you have created yourself, as you did at M.E. Da Great. Joseph2302 (talk) 22:52, 30 April 2015 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove a speedy deletion notice from a page you have created yourself, as you did at M.E. Da Great. Joseph2302 (talk) 22:53, 30 April 2015 (UTC)

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war&#32; according to the reverts you have made on M.E. Da Great. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement. Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states: In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, and breaking the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a block. If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. Gparyani (talk) 22:53, 30 April 2015 (UTC)
 * 1) Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made.
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

This is your only warning; if you make personal attacks on other people again, as you did at User talk:Joseph2302, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. Joseph2302 (talk) 22:55, 30 April 2015 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of M.E. Da Great


A tag has been placed on M.E. Da Great requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Joseph2302 (talk) 23:00, 30 April 2015 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of M.E. Da Great


Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, introducing inappropriate pages, such as M.E. Da Great, is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Under section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, the page has been nominated for deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Joseph2302 (talk) 23:01, 30 April 2015 (UTC)

April 2015
This is your only warning; if you create an inappropriate page again, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. § FreeRangeFrog croak 23:07, 30 April 2015 (UTC)


 * If you believe the subjects you want to write about meet the notability guidelines then please use Articles for Creation instead. Simply recreating the article and insulting other editors can and will get your account blocked. § FreeRangeFrog croak 23:08, 30 April 2015 (UTC)

Sockpuppet investigation
Joseph2302 (talk) 23:17, 30 April 2015 (UTC)

April 2015
You have been blocked temporarily from editing for disruptive editing, personal attacks and abusing multiple accounts. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text below this notice:. § FreeRangeFrog croak 23:20, 30 April 2015 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text below this notice:. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)  06:36, 18 May 2015 (UTC)